1 / 26

Slicing up hyperbolic tetrahedra: from the infinite to the finite

Slicing up hyperbolic tetrahedra: from the infinite to the finite. Yana Mohanty. University of California, San Diego. mohanty@math.ucsd.edu. Overview. Spherical 2-D geometry. Hyperbolic 2-D geometry. Hyperbolic 3-D geometry. Hyperbolic tetrahedra. Problem statement:

danton
Download Presentation

Slicing up hyperbolic tetrahedra: from the infinite to the finite

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Slicing up hyperbolic tetrahedra: from the infinite to the finite Yana Mohanty University of California, San Diego mohanty@math.ucsd.edu Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  2. Overview Spherical 2-D geometry Hyperbolic 2-D geometry Hyperbolic 3-D geometry Hyperbolic tetrahedra Problem statement: Construct a finite tetrahadron out of ideal tetrahedra Motivation Study of hyperbolic 3-manifolds Scissors congruence problems Outline of method Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  3. “Lines” are great circles • Each pair of lines intersects in two points • Triangles are “plump” • Any 2-dimensional map distorts angles and/or lengths Spherical geometry Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  4. The Mercator projection: a conformal map of the sphere Angles shown are the true angles! (conformal) Areas near poles are greatly distorted Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  5. Hyperbolic geometry: the “opposite” of spherical geometry • Triangles are “skinny” • Given a point P and a line L there are many lines through P that do not intersect L. • Any 2-dimensional map distorts angles and/or lengths. A piece of a hyperbolic surface in space Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  6. lines Escher’s Circle Limit I The Poincare model of the hyperbolic plane • Preserves angles • (conformal) • Distorts lengths Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  7. Hyperbolic space LINES PLANES Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  8. metric: metric: Inversion: z>0 The Poincare and upper half-space models(obtained by inversion) z=0 Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  9. H3: The upper halfspace model(obtained by inversion) metric: “point at infinity” z>0 z=0 Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  10. Lines and planes in the half-plane model of hyperbolic space Contains point at infinity lines PLANES Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  11. Ideal tetrahedron in H3 (Poincare model) Convex hull of 4 points at the sphere at infinity Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  12. Ideal tetrahedron inH3 (half-space model) B b B b g a g C a C A A Determined by triangle ABC View from above Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  13. Hyperbolic tetrahedra ideal: 2 parameters ¾-ideal: 3 parameters finite: 6 parameters 1 or 2 ideal vertices also possible Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  14. Problem statement: How do you make out of finitely many of these? • The rules: • an ideal tetrahedron may count as + or – • use finitely many planar cuts Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  15. What is this needed for: part I Study of hyperbolic 3-manifolds 2-Manifold: An object which is homeomorphic to a plane near every one of its points. can be stretched into without tearing Example of a Euclidean 2-manifold A 2 manifold may NOT contain Can’t be stretched into a plane near this point Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  16. Euclidean 3-manifold Example: 3-Torus Glue together opposite faces Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  17. Hyperbolic 3-manifold Example: the Seifert-Weber space Drawing from Jeff Weeks’ Shape of Space Image by Matthias Weber Glue together opposite faces Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  18. A strange and amazing fact: The volume of a hyperbolic 3-manifold is a topological invariant 3-manifold Y 3-manifold X Homeomorphic (There is a continuous 1-1 map from X to Y with a continuous inverse) X and Y have the same volume Volume computation generally requires triangulating, that is, cutting up the manifold into tetrahedra. Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  19. Triangulating a hyperbolic 2-manifold Finite hyperbolic octagon 2-holed torus glue Drawing by Tadao Ito In hyperbolic space triangulation involves finite tetrahedra (6-parameters) Better: express in terms of ideal tetrahedra (2-parameters) Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  20. Example in Euclidean space: “Hill’s tetrahedron” What is this needed for: part II Solving scissors congruence problems in hyperbolic space: Given 2 polyhedra of equal volume, can one be cut up into a finite number of pieces that can be reassembled into the other one? Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  21. volume=L(g) (hidden) volume=L(b) volume=L(a) An expression for volume that also gives a canonical decompositon? Exists for ideal tetrahedra: b a V =L(a)+L(b)+L(g), g finite! where is the Lobachevsky function. Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  22. Construction of a 3/4-ideal tetrahedron out of ideal tetrahedra: extends “volume formula as a decomposition” idea to tetrahedra with finite vertex History: Algebraic Proved in 1982 by Dupont and Sah using homology. Geometric • Mentioned as unknown by W. Neumann in 1998 survey article on 3-manifolds. • Indications of construction given by Sah in 1981, but these were not well known. Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  23. rotated {a,b,c,p} p p Main idea behind proof Make a a certain type of ¾-ideal tetrahedron first d d d = + - p c c c a a b b Inspiration for choosing ideal tetrahedra: another proof of Dupont and Sah Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  24. Step 1: finite out of 1-ideal Step 2: 1-ideal out of ¾-ideal E D C B A C B A D 1-ideal finite B 1-ideal ideal ¾-ideal C A Remainder of the proof Making a finite tetrahedron out of ¾-ideal tetrahedra E C’ B’ E A’ ABCE=A’B’C’E-A’B’BE-B’C’CE-C’A’AE ABCD=ABCE-ABDE Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  25. Examples of conformal models • Spherical: Mercator projection • Hyperbolic: Poincare ball • Introduced hyperbolic tetrahedra Summary • Comparison of spherical and hyperbolic geometries Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

  26. Constructing a finite tetrahedron out of ideal ones is helpful for studying • -hyperbolic 3-manifolds • volume is an invariant, so construction is helpful in the • 3-dimensional equivalent of -scissors congruences want volume formula that is also a decomposition Summary, continued • Main ingredient: constructing a certain ¾-ideal tetrahedron • out of ideal tetrahedra. Idea comes from a proof by • Dupont and Sah. Yana Mohanty, University of California, San Diego, mohanty@math.ucsd.edu

More Related