1 / 6

developpement-durable.gouv.fr

Water Framework Directive Feedback on reporting on 22 March 2010 ------ TG Wise Madrid –7&8 June 2010. Ministère de l'Écologie, de l'Énergie, du Développement durable et de la Mer. www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr. Good news. Intensive involvement and good cooperation

darci
Download Presentation

developpement-durable.gouv.fr

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Water Framework DirectiveFeedback onreporting on 22 March 2010------TG Wise Madrid –7&8 June 2010 Ministère de l'Écologie, de l'Énergie, du Développement durable et de la Mer www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr

  2. Feedback from reporting of March 2010 Good news • Intensive involvement and good cooperation • From experts and all partners • From local and national level • Real political commitment • Reporting tour in each RBD chaired by a member of the WBD board • Information to the Committee for water and competent authorities at key times • Good adaptability and resourcefulness from the European partners • Training session • Atkins availability – online assistance and log of questions • Tools for the reporting

  3. Feedback from reporting of March 2010 Bad news • Heavy burden • 8-10 years man of work- More than estimated • Resubmission of article 5 updated in links with RBDMP & PoM • Tools under continuing development • Last updated version of GIS Guidance on 22 December • Waste of time (many discussions to try to solve problems) • Complexity of reporting with a lot of players

  4. Feedback from reporting of March 2010 To be improved • National –RBD organisation • To be adapted/consolidated for future reporting • Interoperability WISE & GIS specifications • Improve the coordination between the 2 guidances • Better coordination between teams Wise & GIS • Gaps between requirements & knowledge status • Not all data available (E.g coastal water data) • Use of alternative methods to reduce unknown data but affecting the confidence level

  5. Feedback from reporting of March 2010 Next steps • Structure the reporting organisation with partners • A study with people having worked for the reporting • Integrate reporting in usual work • Cross-cutting analyses • Consistency checks • Data reported analyses • Set up action plans to go on • Thematic action plans • National tool to follow up the PoM

  6. Feedback from reporting of March 2010 2013 reporting • Make reporting sheets and reporting schemas at the same time

More Related