1 / 7

Metadata Standards Directory Working Group (MASDIR) Metadata Interest Group (MIG)

Metadata Standards Directory Working Group (MASDIR) Metadata Interest Group (MIG). Agenda 14:00-14:10 - Welcome 14:10-14:15 - Brief overview, communication - MASDIR 14:15-14:20 - Vision/ideas for MIG 14:20-14:25 – CAMP-4-DATA 14:25-15:30 MASDIR goals, questions, discussion & engagement

darci
Download Presentation

Metadata Standards Directory Working Group (MASDIR) Metadata Interest Group (MIG)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Metadata Standards Directory Working Group (MASDIR)Metadata Interest Group (MIG) Agenda • 14:00-14:10 - Welcome • 14:10-14:15 - Brief overview, communication - MASDIR • 14:15-14:20 - Vision/ideas for MIG • 14:20-14:25 – CAMP-4-DATA • 14:25-15:30 • MASDIR goals, questions, discussion & engagement • 15:30-15:45 - MIG overview and discussion •  15:45-16:00 - Summarize action items; closing remarks

  2. Brief overview • October 2012, first Plenary, low-hanging fruit, … • “…develop a collaborative, open directory of metadata standards applicable to scientific data” • Stakeholders • Not metadata a catalog of repositories  • Connecting with DCC (Digital Curation Center) • Disciplinary Metadata Directory (http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/metadata-standards)

  3. Communication channels/RDA forum RDA forum: https://rd-alliance.org/node mailing list: rda-cwg-metadata@lists.rd-alliance.org

  4. Candidate Metadata WG • Driving question/s refined: • What functions do stakeholder wish to do on the data? • How can metadata support these functions? • Stakeholders: users of research data Action Items • Revise case statement including timeline (1 month) • Move forward with 2 phases (12 to 18 months) • Phase 1: Enhance the DCC directory of metadata standards (6 months) • Move to open environment, supporting community driven contributions • Implement community driven framework for feedback • Phase 2: Build on community engagement (phase 1) to identify recommended practices for metadata use • Gather data on who use what, community rating/feedback/interaction • Phase 3: Ten years out, metadata may no longer be a word • Conduct assessments with each phase • Log longer term goals

  5. CAMP-4-DATA Workshop • Interoperability • research datasets within and across domains • Universal schemes/models • necessary, feasible or desirable • Metadata Directory sustainability • open and participatory directories

  6. MASDIR goals, questions, discussion & engagement To be – 2 years out, 10 years out • Directory, why, what should it do? • An open directory • What is the best platform? As is…..current status… • DCC (Digital Curation Center) Disciplinary Metadata Directory http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/metadata-standards • Any other directories? • How could we aid/feed/make accessible? • DCC is for humans should/could we make it machine accessible? • use cases, should this be an emphasis • mapping, save people from duplicative efforts, converters

  7. MASDIR goals, questions, discussion & engagement Bridging the gap … between “as is” and “to be” • Defining concrete steps • Do you see standards that are missing? • What are you willing to do? • Low barriers to get stuff in the directory • Form for DCC input • Would you fill in the form for your organization, discipline, country, other • Additional data to collect: DCC broken links, news… • Rating of standards, recommender systems

More Related