1 / 20

Inspire MIG:

Inspire MIG: - Technological developments - status and challenges: MIG-T activities, technology watch, technology watch, messages and interaction towards MIG-P. , 1.10. 2014, Norwegia Mapping Authority , Arvid Lillethun,.

hans
Download Presentation

Inspire MIG:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Inspire MIG: - Technological developments - status and challenges: MIG-T activities, technology watch, technology watch, messages and interaction towards MIG-P , 1.10. 2014, Norwegia Mapping Authority, Arvid Lillethun,

  2. New work package for the MIWP?: Technological developments - status and challenges • Suggestionpostedon MIG site • Manynarrowwpissues. Decisionswithin WG+MIG-T may have huge implications (MS, org, users) • Action to lift up tech+ impldiscussions • Mid-termreview • An annualreport from MIG-T? • Can be part of a regime for interactionwith MIG-P

  3. New work package for the MIWP?: Technological developments - status and challenges • Inspire is a directive/regulations specifying in very detail • The MIG work programme focuses on narrow issues in extreme detail – necessary and highly appreciated work – more of this • Do we need to accept existing Inspire specs and limits? • Technology - moves quickly - we have to cope with it, else Inspire will be a dying directive • Needed changes ….

  4. New work package for the MIWP?: Technological developments - status and challenges • The MIG-T should have a action working on the “high level” messages on • Consumer trends • Observed and foreseen changes in consumer habits/ use profiles • Location everywhere – internet of things • Sharing • Technological trends - solutions • Trends, “Open” ESDI & NSDI • Semantic techs, Linked data rdf, PID, • New formats - geojson, topojson, jsonLD, …. • New api’s/services - rest-api, …. • Sensors • Dynamics • integration of data sorurces • complex data structures - simlifying data • from geo to IT, • Should analyze to detect the most important changes/ adjustments to be done • Data • Where to putfocus – the large usercommunities, where to succeed • Facilitatenationalneeds, not onlycross-border European • Roles • Implementingstrategies – westeadilydevelop - whichroles for whom?

  5. Work in MIG-T – Annualreportontech and data implementationchallenges • Focusonusers, benefits, ”quickwins” • Relate Inspire specs/techn/org to trends • Consequenses to continue as is / do changes • Meesageunclear – drowning in details • Generalise and prioritisetechissues to understandablemessages • Annualreport • Reportannually to MIG-P • Regime for interaction – MIG-T – MIG-P

  6. PossibleissueExample 1:

  7. Inspire data models to cover needs of priority environmental reporting Reporting Inspire • The objective was to have data models covering the full model of the main environmental reporting data • The situation is that there is Inspire only covers part of the reporting data models • EEA is following up two ways • EIONET community and reporting data flows • Inspire data • This is waste of resources and confusing results with double data, continuing like this will not get support from technical tools/ work in Inspire • The inspire data model should cover • all the needed features and be a 1:1 data model • Or at least cover the reporting data model • Should identify the reporting themes in question; wfd, ccda, air q, other • Objective to change Inspire data models • How should this be debated in MIG-T • Mig-T should give signals to MIG-P on a solution today Wantedsituation or Wantedsituation

  8. Inspire implementation to be specific on data themes and priority actions • Examplegeology • All kindsofprioritythemes? • Harmonisewhich data? • From bits and pieces to Pan-european or regional • ”scales” • ELF

  9. PossibleissueExample 2:

  10. European organisations to distributeInspiredatasets? • Data reported to European organisations to be distributed by these organisations • On behalf of the countries • Will build on existing data flows • Will be resource effective • Needed decisions • Needed agreements • E.g. Eurogeosurvey, Eurogeographics, Eurotat, EEA, Eurocontrol….

  11. Health care/services data + sources • Eurostat – statistical data on nuts 1 or 2 • Health care: resources and patients (non-expenditure data) (t_hlth_care) • Practising physicians (tps00044) • Licensed physicians (tps00167) • Practising dentists (tps00045) • Hospital beds (tps00046) • Curative care beds in hospitals (tps00168) • Psychiatric care beds in hospitals (tps00047) • Discharges from hospitals (tps00048) – use of the different services • Health care: indicators from surveys (SILC, HIS round 2004) (t_hlth_care1) • Self reported unmet need for medical examination or treatment, by income quintile (tsdph270) • Important • Space resolution, nuts 1+2+municipality • time resolution • Actual figures (number of doctors) or health expenditure figures

  12. Euro-stat Health care Health care: resources and patients (non-expenditure data) (reg_hlth_care) Health personnel by region - Absolute numbers and rate per 100,000 inhabitants (hlth_rs_prsrg) Hospital beds (HP.1) by region - Absolute numbers and rate per 100,000 inhabitants (hlth_rs_bdsrg) Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, total number – Total (hlth_co_disch1t) Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, total number – Males (hlth_co_disch1m) Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, total number – Females (hlth_co_disch1f) Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, per 100,000 inhabitants – Females (hlth_co_disch2f) Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, per 100,000 inhabitants – Males(hlth_co_disch2m) Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, per 100,000 inhabitants – Total (hlth_co_disch2t) In-patient average length of stay (ISHMT, in days) by region - Females (hlth_co_inpstf) In-patient average length of stay (ISHMT, in days) by region - Males (hlth_co_inpstm) In-patient average length of stay (ISHMT, in days) by region - Total (hlth_co_inpstt) Hospital days of in-patients (ISHMT) by region - Females (hlth_co_hosdayf) Hospital days of in-patients (ISHMT) by region - Males (hlth_co_hosdaym) Hospital days of in-patients (ISHMT) by region - Total (hlth_co_hosdayt) Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, day cases, total number – Females (hlth_co_disch3f) Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, day cases, total number – Males (hlth_co_disch3m) Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, day cases, total number – Total (hlth_co_disch3t)

  13. Work in MIG-T – Annualreportontech and data implementationchallenges • Focusonusers, benefits, quickwins • Relate Inspire specs/techn/org to trends • Consequenses to continue as is/ do changes • Meesageunclear – drowning in details • Generalisetechissues to understandablemessages • Onlytech or alsogeneralise from thematicclusters / all wpactions? • Annualreport • Reportannually to MIG-P • Regime for interaction – MIG-T – MIG-P

  14. National metadata validatorNorwegiantecnicalcontroltool/validatorbasedon Inspire service • We are connecting up to the validation service • We get lots of “not accepted” metadata • Why ? They are correct! • Its because the Inspire validator is not only checking metadata • But is also checking the wms! That’s not metdata • Please split validation service into two

More Related