1 / 13

WP2: User Requirements

WP2: User Requirements. “… elaborate clear and understandable user requirements that will help the project in delivering the media framework solutions and will lead to system and functional specification for the IM3I tools and framework”. Approach. Definition of themes Online questionnaire

darcie
Download Presentation

WP2: User Requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP2: User Requirements “…elaborate clear and understandable user requirements that will help the project in delivering the media framework solutions and will lead to system and functional specification for the IM3I tools and framework”.

  2. Approach Definition of themes Online questionnaire StructuredInterviews Analysis of outcomes/ orientation Forwardingoutcomes to specification

  3. Themes online Survey Use of websites/ tools andapplications Consumptionandorganisation of media files Participation / Web 2.0 functionalitylikes/dislikes

  4. Online Survey (jan 2009) 11.500 targetedculturalconsumers 319 responses (2.8 %) 70% is online daily; more than 1 hour More than 80% searchesfor- andconsume video, musicandphotographs 83% is satisfiedwithoff-line media management 52% puts media files online 62% shared by email

  5. Online Survey (jan 2009) -Privacy is important; Information overload -In 2009 use of smartphonenotyet as established -60% was passive online -generally happy with google -Not in favour of mixingand matching media

  6. Online Survey: wouldlike… pod/ vodcastsearching (68%) Query byexample (68%) Locationbasedvisualisations (51%) Information byexample (take a picture, retrievedescription) (64%)

  7. Professional Interviews Interviews with 18 media professionals 3 field of audio/music 5 field of video 4 field of photography 6field of repositories / librarians

  8. Themes Interfaces (3D, media navigation, mixed media) Textual versus visual search Metadata, social bookmarks etc. Online collaboration

  9. Conclusions Interfaces 3D is more seen as a gimmick thanhelpful 3D is interesting in mappingrelationships(andromeda) Mixing 2D contents in 3D interfaces willnotwork Easy to use audio, video navigation (inmedia- navigation) Helpfulaudio visualisation

  10. Conclusions search mechanisms Textual search is dominant over visual search Textual search couldprofitfromvisual filtering (followedbysimilarity search) Search on color, textureetcwouldbehelpfull

  11. Metadata, folksonomies etc. Support forsimilarity search but as a extension of textual search Mixed feelingsaboutrecommendations systems Metadataextractedfromactualuse/ workflow is seen as relevant Automatic segmentation is relevant Automatic analysis is relevant althoughlimitatons are known

  12. Collaboration. Support for workflow Support for online collaboration Support for end-user participation Support forfolksonomies

  13. Platform requirements Open, adaptable and flexible Cloudbased and online Easy handling of mediafiles Visualisation of relations User friendly annotating Automatic segmentation/ concept detection Easy replication of a collection of media materials Mobile features Allow flexible re-engeneering of functionality and workflow

More Related