1 / 9

Initial Comments on RGGI Draft Model Rule

Initial Comments on RGGI Draft Model Rule. The Climate Trust May 2, 2006. Offset Additionality. Should the program allow for capture of incentives from other RE programs: Yes, but not in all instances.

daria-cruz
Download Presentation

Initial Comments on RGGI Draft Model Rule

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Initial Comments on RGGI Draft Model Rule The Climate Trust May 2, 2006

  2. Offset Additionality • Should the program allow for capture of incentives from other RE programs: • Yes, but not in all instances. • To extent RPS is a requirement, not an incentive, may preclude eligibility because cost recovery in system and GHG reductions become baseline. • Other instances exist in which RE should be allowed to generate GHG offsets • Will refer to RE Working Group paper from 2005

  3. Offset Additionality • Should the program allow for capture of incentives from other SBC programs: • Yes, but not in all instances. • The Climate Trust has collaborated with the Energy Trust of Oregon (SBC fund focused primarily on EE) to identify projects that meet market or program additionality tests • Maximum simple payback thresholds • Program funding capacity constraints • Historical market penetration data • This could also apply for RE technology funds

  4. RGGI Offset Pilot Program • Public-Private Partnership managed by a third party, “public benefits corporation” • Governance: controlled entities, RGGI regulators, third-party administrator, stakeholder representation • Purpose: Solicit, evaluate and contract offset projects for future delivery: • Secure reductions outside of entities’ area control • Provide ongoing market information (price, transaction costs, etc.) • Identify other eligible project sectors • Continue reducing in “non-capped” sectors • Disseminate information on offset project quality

  5. Energy Companies Obligations: Carbon funding Expectations: Credit for emissions reductions Mitigation of regulatory risk and uncertainty RGGI Regulators Obligations: Risk mitigation for participating companies Compliance oversight Expectations: Real emissions reductions Entity collaboration / cooperation Potential Roles for Partners Third-Party Administrator • Obligations: • Solicitation, Evaluation, Contracting, Contract Management • Expectations: • Cost recovery Stakeholder Representation • Obligations: • Oversight and support • Technical expertise • Expectations: • Accountability • Transparency

  6. Controlled Entities RGGI Regulators (Advisory Body) Risk Mitigation $ Oversight CO2 Potential Pilot Structure Energy Companies RGGI Regulators (Advisory Body) Risk Mitigation $ Oversight CO2 Third-Party Administrator Stakeholder Representation $ CO2 Offset Projects

  7. Accept Some Dissonanceto Optimize the Regulatory Moment • The challenge to reduce emissions on an economy wide basis means we must accelerate and/or re-direct investment into sectors and projects measurably reducing GHGs • Monetizing future streams of reductions from project activities will achieve that goal • Project life-cycle approach provides standardized processes that can lead to standardized accounting for “non-RGGI” sectors

  8. Thank You. • Detailed written comments to follow Michael S. Ashford Deputy Director The Climate Trust mashford@climatetrust.org Phone: (503) 238-1915 Fax: (503) 238-1953

More Related