180 likes | 356 Views
Business Ethics Meeting the little angels and little devils on our shoulders. Scott J. Reynolds, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Business Ethics Weyerhaeuser Faculty Fellow. The dilemma. A battle between ends and means. Teleology (the study of the ends) The ends The consequences The good
E N D
Business EthicsMeeting the little angels and little devils on our shoulders Scott J. Reynolds, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Business Ethics Weyerhaeuser Faculty Fellow
A battle between ends and means • Teleology (the study of the ends) • The ends • The consequences • The good • Deontology (the study of duty or obligation) • The means • The standards • The right
Teleology • “What is moral is that which is good” • Good vs. bad, benefits vs. costs • Egoism • Consequentialism • Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism • John Stuart Mill (1863) • The moral act creates… “The greatest good for the greatest number” • Costs/Benefits Analysis
Utilitarianism • Advantages • Maximization of the good • “Easy” decision process • Popular • Disadvantages • Measurement • The means • Individual rights
Tell me honestly, I challenge you--answer me: imagine that you are charged with building the edifice of human destiny, the ultimate aim of which is to bring people happiness, to give them peace and contentment at last, but that in order to achieve this it is essential and unavoidable to torture just one little speck of creation, that same little child beating her chest with her little fists, and imagine that this edifice, has to be erected on her unexpiated tears. Would you agree to be the architect under those conditions? Tell me honestly? -- from the Brothers Karamazov
Deontology • “What is moral is that which meets a standard” • Standards of behavior: rules, principles, guidelines, laws, mores, norms, codes, policies, procedures… • Right and wrong • Common Morality • Rules of thumb or simple moral codes (Golden Rule, Ten Commandments, Kindergarten Files, maxims, Confucius sayings, HBR articles,…)
Formalism • Immanuel Kant (1763) • Good will (motives) • Rationality • Categorical Imperative • Formulation 1: “Everybody or nobody” • Formulation 2: “Don’t use people”
Formalism • Advantages • Protects the means • Protects individual rights • Morally more appealing (more noble) • Disadvantages • Requires prioritization • Requires interpretation • Inflexible/Impractical
The Tension of Ethical Dilemmas • Means vs. ends • Rules vs. results • The good vs. the right • Principle vs. practicality
Examples of Ethical Dilemmas • Marijuana use • Capital punishment • Abortion • War • Enron • Donald Sterling
The Three Roles of the Four Corners • Description • The journalist’s cap • Judgment • The judge’s robes • Persuasion • The leader’s toolbox
SETA • 15 questions with only two options: deontology or teleology • Scoring: • 1 point for every odd A (questions 1, 3, 5, …) • 1 point for every even B (questions 2, 4, 6, …) • Scores range from 0 to 15 • 0-7 deontology (Kant/formalist) • 8-15 teleology (Mill/utilitarian)
Why is this important? • Description • To uncover blind spots • To understand multiple positions • Judgment • To find your “sound bite” • To generate unconsidered options • Persuasion • To create powerful and effective responses • To persuade others • To lead others
Thank you Scott J. Reynolds, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Business Ethics Weyerhaeuser Faculty Fellow Michael G. Foster School of Business University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 206.543.4452 heyscott@uw.edu