1 / 19

Lockheed Martin/ IEEE Computer Society Webinar Survey Results

Lockheed Martin/ IEEE Computer Society Webinar Survey Results. Dick Price, Deb Sims, Jeff Decker—IEEE CS Scott LaChance —LMCO 16 July 2010. Why We Surveyed. Anecdotal support for Webinar series has been strong from audience members, presenters, and Fellows, but…

darren
Download Presentation

Lockheed Martin/ IEEE Computer Society Webinar Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lockheed Martin/ IEEE Computer Society Webinar Survey Results Dick Price, Deb Sims, Jeff Decker—IEEE CS Scott LaChance—LMCO 16 July 2010

  2. 2 Why We Surveyed • Anecdotal support for Webinar series has been strong from audience members, presenters, and Fellows, but… • Survey data will point to specific areas for improvement • Will also help identify future topics and speakers • Will allow us to compare interest with last year’s survey results

  3. 3 Who We Surveyed • On June 24, sent invitation to 7,279 LMCO staff who registered since the program’s inception • For firewall and confidentiality reasons, Scott LaChance sent a reminder the next week. • Received 356 responses, compared to 334 for last year’s survey

  4. 4 Questions We Asked 17 questions in all 12 multiple choice questions Questions about future topics, series Speaker rating question “How best to improve series” questions Providing results for multiple choice questions and trends analysis here Recommendations for future topics & speakers attached as appendices

  5. Key Conclusions We See Overwhelming support on most questions: 80% and 90% or more favorable 97.2% say series should continue Strong but not overwhelming support: Q3: Helped me in my work (65.6% agree) Little support for change: frequency (89.6% stay same) length of Q&A session (23.4% longer) Neutral (43.9%) on increased interest within group (Q9) 5

  6. 6 1. Overall, the Webinars Series has been very valuable. • 86.2% agree • 30.7% strongly • 55.5% agree • 2.5% disagree • 1.1% disagree • 1.4% strongly • 11.3% neutral • 4.13 average • 2009 Results • 91.0% agree • 30.5% strongly • 60.5% agree • 1.5% disagree • 0.6% disagree • 0.9% strongly • 5% neutral • 4.19 average

  7. 2. The Webinars Series has aided me in keeping current. 84.2% agree 27.0% strongly 57.2% agree 1.9% disagree 0.8% disagree 1.1% strongly 13.8% neutral 4.08 average • 2009 Results • 89.8% agree • 30.2% strongly • 59.6% agree • 2.1% disagree • 1.2% disagree • 0.9% strongly • 1% neutral • 4.17 average 7

  8. 3. The Webinars Series content has been relevant & helped me in my work activities. 65.6% agree 14.6% strongly 51.0% agree 6.5% disagree 5.1% disagree 1.4% strongly 27.9% neutral 3.72 average • 2009 Results • 65.6% agree • 14.4% strongly • 51.2% agree • 3.6% disagree • 2.4% disagree • 1.2% strongly • 30.8% neutral • 3.75 average 8

  9. 4. The Webinars Series speakers are knowledgeable and interesting. 94.9% agree 44.5% strongly 50.4% agree 1.2% disagree 0.6% disagree 0.6% strongly 3.9% neutral 4.38 average • 2009 Results • 93.4% agree • 37.4% strongly • 56.0% agree • 0.6% disagree • 0.6% disagree • 0% strongly • 0% neutral • 4.30 average 9

  10. 5. I would like to see more time allotted for Q&A. 23.4% agree 3.9% strongly 15.2% agree 11.7% disagree 13.8% disagree 0.8% strongly 66.2% neutral 3.08 average • 2009 Results • 23.4% agree • 6.3% strongly • 17.1% agree • 11.7% disagree • 11.7% disagree • 0% strongly • 65.0% neutral • 3.18 average 10

  11. 6. The Webinar Series bi-weekly scheduling should be: 6.2% more frequent 89.6% same 4.2% less frequent • 2009 Results • 5.7% more frequent • 88.9% same • 5.4% less frequent 11

  12. 7. The interest in the Webinar Series has recently increased in my group. 20.6% agree 1.7% strongly 18.9% agree 16.6% disagree 13.8% disagree 2.8% strongly 43.9% neutral 3.03 average • 2009 Results • 25.5% agree • 2.4% strongly • 23.1% agree • 11.7% disagree • 10.2% disagree • 1.5% strongly • 62.9% neutral • 3.15 average 12

  13. 8. How many webinars have you attended live? 8.5% - 0 48.7% - 1 to 3 26.2% - 4 to 6 9.0% - 7-10 7.6% - >10 • 2009 Results • 11.4% - 0 • 47.0% - 1 to 3 • 26.9% - 4 to 6 • 14.7% - >6 13

  14. 9. How many archived webinar have you viewed? 34.6% - 0 44.5% - 1 to 3 12.1% - 4 to 6 5.9% - 7-10 2.8% - >10 • 2009 Results • 39.9% - 0 • 45.5% - 1 to 3 • 8.4% - 4 to 6 • 7.2% - >6 14

  15. 10. How many colleagues have you recommended an archived webinar 41.7% - 0 40.0% - 1 to 3 9.6% - 4 to 6 8.7% - >6 • 2009 Results • 42.5% - 0 • 41.3% - 1 to 3 • 9.0% - 4 to 6 • 7.2% - >6 15

  16. 11. The Webinar Series should continue through 2010 and beyond 97.2% Yes 2.8% No • 2009 Results • 96.7% Yes • 3.3% No 16

  17. 12. In which month did you view your first webinar? 46 10/08 21 11/08 17 12/08 18 1/09 9 2/09 16 3/09 6 4/09 13 5/09 25 6/09 • 6 7/09 • 5 8/09 • 6 9/09 • 13 10/09 • 13 11/09 • 2 12/09 • 17 01/10 • 17 02/10 • 14 03/10 • 14 04/10 17

  18. Recommendation Threads Numerous requests for greater collaboration: Samples, supplemental materials, follow-on discussion Several requests for better notification, more information Request for management support for attendance, different online tools, leadership and tactical tracks See appendices for speaker, topic, and series recommendations 18

  19. Next Steps Review suggested topics and series to identify strongest threads Review suggested improvements for strongest threads, develop action plan Combine this survey with usage data for more comprehensive report 19

More Related