600 likes | 752 Views
Moral Compass: What keeps the needle pointing North?. Field trip to Steamtown Friday October 11. Notebooks will be graded! We will have QUIZZES!. After class: Tables….careful not to drag on floor. Help clean up, sweep floor, empty cans in bathroom,
E N D
Moral Compass: What keeps the needle pointing North?
Field trip to Steamtown Friday October 11
Notebooks will be graded! We will have QUIZZES!
After class: Tables….careful not to drag on floor. Help clean up, sweep floor, empty cans in bathroom, screen put away
Moral Compass: What keeps the needle pointing North?
Review Mr. UptonIrish Potato FamineCultureEnglish MoneyOpium Wars
Margaret Thatcher the…… bottle snatcher! Iron Lady.
Remember, remember the 5th of November. 1605 Guy Fawkes day. Plot to blow up House of Lords Saved King James I life Thanksgiving Day
Queen Victoria Victorian era….?
Queen Victoria Victorian era 1837-1901 b: 1819
Irish Potato Famine 1845-1846
Irish Potato Famine 1845-1846 Landlords, tenants ( cotters ). MP’s Export food to England Rent money exported to England Landlords pay rate to parish for every tenant,< 4 pounds/year…eviction
Irish Potato Famine 1845-1846 60 potatoes per day! Staple for the poor… Milk, butter, meat, wheat….exported
Irish Potato Famine One variety of potato grown… Potato blight wipes out 85%..... Crop failure on European Continent... but no famine, no immigration. Same in USA…. receives immigrants.
Irish Potato Famine Genocide: Landlord, Parliament, Protestants, exports, greed. This is a stain on Great Britain and the Industrial Revolution.
Irish Potato Famine = Great Famine More than 4 Million fewer Irish….. in 15-20 years. Starvation, disease, immigration
before 1800: Land owners, old power, feudal leftover Parish clergy after 1800: Business owners, new power Rising middle class
A Corn Law was first introduced in Britain in 1804, when the landowners, who dominated Parliament, sought to protect their profits by imposing a duty on imported corn. During the Napoleonic Wars it had not been possible to import corn from Europe. This led to an expansion of British wheat farming and to high bread prices. Farmers feared that when the war came to an end in 1815, the importation of foreign corn would lower prices. This fear was justified and the price of corn fell from 126s. 6d. a quarter in 1812 to 65s. 7d.
This legislation was hated by the people living in Britain's fast-growing towns who had to pay these higher bread prices. The industrial classes saw the Corn Laws as an example of how Parliament passed legislation that favoured large landowners. The manufacturers in particular was concerned that the Corn Laws would result in a demand for higher wages. There was a dreadful harvest in 1816. This caused bread prices to increase rapidly. This was followed by industrial unrest as workers demanded higher wages in order to pay for the increased food prices. As well as strikes there were food riots all over Britain. The Corn Laws had an important political impact on agroup of middle-class moderate reformers meeting at the home of John Potter.
Three years later British landowners applied pressure on members of theHouse of Commons to take action to protect the profits of the farmers. Parliament responded by passing a law permitting the import of foreign wheat free of duty only when the domestic price reached 80 shillings per quarter (8 bushels). During the passing of this legislation, the Houses of Parliament had to be defended by armed troops against a large angry crowd.
Population 5000 - 100BC Year Pop. 5000BC 60,000 3000BC 100,000 1800BC 300,000 100BC 1,500,000
Population 1100 - 1751 Year Pop. ±% p.a. 1100 3,250,000 — 1350 3,000,000 -0.03% 1541 2,774,000 -0.04% 1601 4,110,000 0.66% 1651 5,228,000 0.48% 1700 5,058,000 -0.07% 1751 5,772,000 0.26%
Population 1801 - 2011 Year Pop. ±% p.a. 1801 7,754,875 — 1811 8,762,178 1.23% 1821 10,402,143 1.73% 1831 12,011,830 1.45% 1841 13,654,914 1.29% 1851 15,288,885 1.14% 1861 18,325,052 1.83% 1871 21,361,235 1.54% 1881 24,397,385 1.34% 1891 27,231,229 1.10% 1901 30,072,180 1.00% 1911 33,561,235 1.10% 1921 35,230,225 0.49% 1931 37,359,045 0.59% 1941 38,084,321 0.19% 1951 38,668,830 0.15% 1961 41,159,213 0.63% 1971 43,460,525 0.55% 1981 45,978,080 0.56% 1991 48,197,672 0.47% 2001 49,138,831 0.19% 2011 53,012,456 0.76%
Population Shifts During the Industrial Revolution
Population Shifts During the Industrial Revolution Move from farms to cities
Population Shifts During the Industrial Revolution Cheaply built, overcrowded housing Industrial pollution Terrible sanitation
Population Shifts During the Industrial Revolution Cheaply built, overcrowded housing Industrial pollution Terrible sanitation….. Poor living conditions Polluted air and water Streets full of waste, contaminated water
Poor living conditions Polluted air and water Streets full of waste, contaminated water Spread of Disease: Typhus, Cholera, Influenza.
Breaktime! Moral Compass: What keeps the needle pointing North?
Poor living conditions Polluted air and water Streets full of waste, contaminated water Spread of Disease: Typhus, Cholera, Influenza.
Poor living conditions Polluted air and water Streets full of waste, contaminated water Spread of Disease: Typhus, Cholera, Influenza.
Sewage-related occupations: Tosher Mudlark Nightsoil men, Gong farmers Flushermen Rat-catchers
Orphans in 19th Century Victorian England by Jodi Greig The Victorian Era was a time of social evolution as well as technological and economic advance. A distinct, unique middle class was formed alongside the traditional working class and wealthy aristocracy. However, there were certain individuals that fell outside this model of Victorian society. The “abandoned child” was society’s scapegoat- a person without a past, without connections, without status. They could appear in any class, at any time. Orphans were also often treated with disdain and distrust, due to their reputation as “criminally prone” individuals. They were a victim of classic “Victorian contradictions” that characterized most aspects of Victorian society.
Victorian Definition of “Orphan”When we hear the word “orphan” we imagine a child whose parents have both died tragic deaths. Indeed, there were plenty of these pitiable creatures in Victorian society – the living and working conditions of the poor were so unsanitary and crowded that diseases such as typhus and tuberculosis often spread unchecked, sending many of their victims to the grave (Czarnik, “Living Conditions”). However, children were often considered “orphans” if they had one surviving parent, had been abandoned by their family, or were forced out into the world because of overcrowding at home (Cunningham, “Orphan Texts”). In 1861, it is estimated that 11% of children had lost a father by the age of 10, 11% a mother, and 1% had lost both parents (Czarnik).
Orphanages After the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1934, also known as the New Poor Law, orphanages and children’s homes were created for those who could not care for themselves. Boys were generally taught a trade and girls were prepared to enter domestic service (Czarnik). However, some of these institutions were so awful that children actually opted to pursue a criminal lifestyle on the street than to suffer in an orphanage.
Adoption A very common fate of orphans was adoption. They were often taken in by relatives or neighbors, and even, on occasion, strangers wishing to raise them as their own children. Children who were adopted by their own social class were usually treated fairly and equally… however, if they were adopted by a family whose status was above and beyond their original class, they were frequently mistreated and neglected. Children of different social classes were not encouraged to fraternize, so if an orphan was taken into a household where higher class children lived, they could be forbidden to even speak to them (Czarnik).
Education Orphans sometimes met another fate… being placed in an educational institution. Many philanthropists donated money to these “schools” for the express purpose of boarding and educating orphans. Their education was rarely as good as those whose families paid for it, yet it still gave them an advantage that many of their peers lacked. Most of these programs were designed specifically to train children to a lower-middle class occupation, such as becoming a governess. Food, education, and lodging were provided until the orphan turned 17… then they were expected to begin working (Czarnik).
Some of these institutions were not such a good “opportunity”. Many were underfunded, crowded, and unsanitary. Disease spread rapidly in such close quarters, and poor nutrition and excess corporeal punishment didn’t help matters much. (Charles Dickens: Nicholas Nickleby)
Criminals/Other Occupations Orphans who were not adopted nor entered an institution often became criminals. Indeed, an estimated 60% of the criminal population were orphans, at one point or another (Cunningham, “Orphan Texts”). They indulged in thievery or became prostitutes to survive (Payne, “Two literary”). The more honest orphans who lived on the streets often banded together for survival, doing menial tasks for the upper class, or begging for money.
Works Cited Cunningham, Hugh. “Orphan Texts: Victorian Orphans, Culture and Empire (review)” Victorian Studies. 45.4. Summer 2003. 10 March 2005. <http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/victorian_studies/v045/45.4cunningham.pdf> Czarnik, Jason. “Living Conditions of Orphans in Nineteenth Century England”. Charlotte’s Web. Ed. Lisa Denney, Elizabeth Bellalouna, and Lauren Russette. U of Michigan-Dearborn. Winter 2003. 10 March 2005. <http://www.umd.umich.edu/casl/hum/eng/classes/434/charweb/czarnik1.htm>. Payne, Jennifer. “Two literary treatments of prostitution in mid-19th century England: Rosetti's "Jenny" and Gaskell's ‘Esther’” History Homepage for Jennifer Payne. 24 August 1998. 11 March 2005. <http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Aegean/7023/prostitution.html>.
The Terra Cotta Warriors of Emperor Qin Dress – neat, modest
English Currency Pound, Quid, shilling, Pence, h-penny farthing, guinea