1 / 18

Chemical Selection and Prioritization for Washington’s Children’s Safe Product Act (CSPA)

Chemical Selection and Prioritization for Washington’s Children’s Safe Product Act (CSPA). Alex Stone Chemist, WA Dept. of Ecology EPA Prioritization Workshop April 6-7, 2010. CSPA Implementation. Three Phases Identification of Chemicals of High Concern to Children (CHCCs)

daryl-rosales
Download Presentation

Chemical Selection and Prioritization for Washington’s Children’s Safe Product Act (CSPA)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chemical Selection and Prioritization for Washington’s Children’s Safe Product Act (CSPA) Alex Stone Chemist, WA Dept. of Ecology EPA Prioritization Workshop April 6-7, 2010

  2. CSPA Implementation Three Phases • Identification of Chemicals of High Concern to Children (CHCCs) • Prioritization of CHCCs • Final review and determination of CHCCs to be placed into regulation

  3. Phase 1 • Identify High Priority Chemicals (HPC) • Identify Chemicals in Potential Exposure Sources • Identify Chemicals of High Concern to Children (CHCCs), i. e. chemicals that are: • An HPC and • Found in at least one of the potential exposure pathways

  4. ‘High Priority Chemicals’ (HPCs): (From legislation) • Section 2: Definitions • ‘High priority chemical’ as identified by: • State agency • Federal agency • Accredited research university • Other scientific evidence deemed authoritative by Ecology • One or more of the following criteria: • Developmental toxin • Cause: • Cancer • Genetic damage • Reproductive harm • Endocrine disruptor • Damage: • Nervous system • Immune system • Organs • Other systemic toxicity • PBT • vPvB (very persistent & very bioaccumulative) HPCs

  5. HPC Sources:

  6. From HPCs, identify ‘chemicals of high concern to children (CHCCs): (From legislation) Exposure Lists: Section 4: Identifying high priority chemicals of high concern for children after considering a child’s or developing fetus’s potential for exposure to each chemical. One or more of the following criteria: Chemicals found in biomonitoring studies: • Humans • Umbilical cord blood • Breast milk • Urine • Other bodily tissues or fluids • Chemicals found in: • Household dust • Indoor air • Drinking water • Elsewhere in the home • Added or present in consumer product used or present in the home Exposure

  7. Exposure Chemical Selection • Generated data in 4 Biomonitoring & potential exposure areas • Biomonitoring • NHANES & Danish Birth Cohort • Journal Articles • Indoor Air & Dust • CA Air Resources Board • Journal Articles • Drinking Water • EPA drinking water standards • Journal Articles • Products • Primarily Danish and Dutch consumer product studies

  8. Exposure Chemical Results

  9. Chemicals removed before further prioritization: 476 178

  10. Phase 2 • Governor’s veto message directed Ecology to place greater emphasis upon chemicals found in children’s products • Prioritized products based upon 3 toxicity criteria of most importance to children and presence in children’s products • Used a ‘weight-of-evidence’ approach

  11. Phase 2 Toxicity criteria • Developmental or reproductive toxicity • Endocrine disruption • Carcinogenicity Exposure criteria • Presence in Children’s products • Exposure potential from those products • Known exposure in general population Created ‘Score Card’ to evaluate CHCCs • Filled out score cards on 178 potential CHCCs

  12. Phase 2 (cont.) • Add WA PBTs back onto list • Reduced 178 to 65 potential CHCCs

  13. Phase 3 Final review of 65 CHCCs to determine those placed into regulation Four components part of final determination: • Final toxicity and exposure review • Determination of a reasonable analytical method • Determination of a reporting level • Overall policy review In the meantime conducting Pilot Rule

  14. Pilot Rule • Create draft rule • Work with regulated community and interested parties to evaluate effectiveness of proposed rule • Based upon input, propose final rule which will contain final list of CHCCs • Undergo formal public comment process • Once finalized, any product sold or manufactured in WA must report to Ecology presence of chemical in product and certain additional information

  15. Links Children Safe Product Act & Pilot Rule Process: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/swfa/rules/ruleChildSafePilot.html Phase 1 process: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V9G-4Y5H5XP-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=6cbd6a426cb849743c8d27f7da883874

  16. Contacts Alex Stone Chemist Washington State Dept. of Ecology alex.stone@ecy.wa.gov Phone: (360) 407-6758

More Related