1 / 23

Examining the Evidence for Inclusion: Research and Practice

2. Part I: Inclusive Education: What We Know about Its Effects . . Algozzine et al.,1988; Gelzheiser et al., 1998; Hollowood et al., 1995; Logan

dash
Download Presentation

Examining the Evidence for Inclusion: Research and Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. 1 Examining the Evidence for Inclusion: Research and Practice Douglas Fisher January 27, 2006 Alliance National Conference

    2. 2 Part I: Inclusive Education: What We Know about Its Effects

    3. Algozzine et al.,1988; Gelzheiser et al., 1998; Hollowood et al., 1995; Logan & Keefe, 1997; Raudenbush et al., 1992; Ryndak et al., submitted; Sontag, 1997; Vaughn et al., 1998 3 Efficacy of Segregated Settings Resource rooms provide primarily whole group reading instruction with little differentiated materials Few differences in instructional methods across self-contained classes for students with various disabilities More instructional time and 1:1 in general classrooms IEP-specified peer interactions were not implemented in segregated settings Placement & labeling lowered teachers perceptions of students efficacy Less learning over time for students with similar diagnoses in segregated settings Better life outcomes for students with inclusive services

    4. 4

    5. Evans et al., 1992; Odom et al., in prep 5 Fostering Class Membership & Belonging Why foster class membership? Students with disabilities are at an increased risk of social rejection if they are: Socially withdrawn Display aggressive and/or conflictive qualities, and Lack an effective communication system Number of social interactions received from students without disabilities may decline over time

    6. Fryxell & Kennedy, 1995; Kennedy et al., 1997 6 Social Outcomes for Students With Disabilities Have more contact with students without disabilities across a wider range of settings and activities Receive and provide higher levels of social support Enjoy larger friendship networks Develop longer-term relationships with peers without disabilities

    7. Fisher & Meyer, 2002; Logan et al., 1998; Ryndak et al., 1995 7 Social Outcomes (continued) Achieve higher scores on measures of social competence Exhibit more displays of happiness behaviors Report increases in childrens participation in extra-curricular activities and decreases in inappropriate social behaviors

    8. Evans et al., 1994; Favazza & Odom, 1997; Fisher et al., 1998; Helmstetter et al., 1994; Kishi & Meyer, 1994; Peck et al., 1990; Staub et al., 1990 8 Social Outcomes for Students without Disabilities Increased acceptance and tolerance of others More developed sense of responsibility and positive self-concept Realistic expectations and perceptions of students with disabilities

    9. Janney & Snell, 1996; Schnorr, 1990, 1997; Staub et al., 1990 9 Strategies for Fostering Class Membership Provide access to peers without disabilities during social times Provide meaningful ways to participate Use cooperative instructional strategies Provide student age-appropriate materials during class activities Know when to Back Off

    10. 10 Communication/Literacy for Children with Disabilities Children with severe disabilities may exhibit idiosyncratic or unconventional ways to communicate since they may not be able to utilize or access more conventional means of communication (facial expressions, speech, body language, print) Communicative intent may need to be interpreted Opportunities to practice communication must be recognized and used Communication outcomes include listening, speaking reading writing Children with severe disabilities may exhibit idiosyncratic or unconventional ways to communicate since they may not be able to utilize or access more conventional means of communication (facial expressions, speech, body language, print) Communicative intent may need to be interpreted Opportunities to practice communication must be recognized and used Communication outcomes include listening, speaking reading writing

    11. Downing, 2001;Erickson & Koppenhaver,1997; Ryndak, Morrison, et al., 1999 11 Communication Outcomes for Students with Disabilities More opportunities to engage in meaningful communication occur in inclusive settings More opportunities for communication occur naturally throughout the day in inclusive settings Request help to engage in an activity, specific items or materials to use, Places to sit or be positioned in, types of snacks, lunch items Control by making these critical communicative attempts is typically reinforcing to the student with disabilities Use of adaptive switch Come see what Ive got Being in a general education classroom is not a goal it is the foundation. Children with severe disabilities may exhibit idiosyncratic, unconventional ways to communicate since they may not be able to utilize or access more conventional means of communication (facial expressions, speech, body language, print) Request help to engage in an activity, specific items or materials to use, Places to sit or be positioned in, types of snacks, lunch items Control by making these critical communicative attempts is typically reinforcing to the student with disabilities Use of adaptive switch Come see what Ive got Being in a general education classroom is not a goal it is the foundation. Children with severe disabilities may exhibit idiosyncratic, unconventional ways to communicate since they may not be able to utilize or access more conventional means of communication (facial expressions, speech, body language, print)

    12. Ryndak, Downing, et al., 1995; Ryndak, Morrison, et al., 1999 12 Communication Outcomes for Students with Disabilities Demonstrate growth in articulation, language use, and vocabulary Participate actively in conversations

    13. Hunt et al., 1996; McSheehan, Sonnemeier, et al., 2002 13 Communication Outcomes for Students without Disabilities Increased reciprocity of interactions, so children without disabilities received support, as well as gave support Improved ability to interpret communicative intent of students with disabilities (i.e., providing natural supports) Giangreco, Edleman, Cloniger, Dennis, 1993 Investigated perceptions of parents of children without disabilities who were members of a class that included a child with severe disabililtiesGiangreco, Edleman, Cloniger, Dennis, 1993 Investigated perceptions of parents of children without disabilities who were members of a class that included a child with severe disabililties

    14. Downing, 2001; Erickson & Koppenhaver, 1995,1997; Ryndak, Morrison, et al., 1999 14 Strategies for Enhancing Communication Recognize that opportunities for communicative exchanges exist Build communicative opportunities into the activities throughout the day Foster responsive communication partners Increase proximity, obtain eye or tactile contact Look expectantly, give time for response, accept current mode of communication Increase proximity, obtain eye or tactile contact Look expectantly, give time for response, accept current mode of communication

    15. Ryndak, Morrison, et al., 1999 15 Literacy Skills for Students with Disabilities allows individuals with severe disabilities to improve & maintain interpersonal interactions, convey needs and wants, exchange information, and express their feelings and ideas.

    16. 16 Academic Aspects for Students with Disabilities

    17. Ferguson et al., 1993; Gilbert et al., 2001; Hunt & Farron-Davis, 1992; Hunt, Farron-Davis, et al., 1994; Hunt, Stab, et al., 1994; Logan & Malone, 1998; McDonnell et al., 2001 17 Service Delivery in Inclusive Settings Higher quality IEP: high overall quality, emphasis on basic skills (academic, social, and communication) along with functional skills Increased task-related interactions with others Increased use of various learning formats: peer-tutoring, cooperative learning

    18. Ferguson et al., 1993; Hollowood et al., 1995; Janney & Snell, 1997; Logan & Malone, 1998; Ryndak et al., 1999 18 Service Delivery in Inclusive Settings Higher expectations for student performance Increased teaching support: teacher collaboration Improved match of instructional contexts to students educational needs Comparable time allocated and used for instruction between inclusive and segregated settings

    19. Cooperland et al., 2001; Fisher & Frey, 2000; Ferguson et al., 1993; Giangreco et al., 1997; Gilbert et al., 2001; Janney & Snell, 1997; McDonell et al., 2001; Ryndak et al., 1999 19 Learning Opportunities in Inclusive Settings Learning opportunities are increased by: Using accommodation and modifications of curriculum, instruction, activities, classroom routines, and settings Providing appropriate peer or adult support (proximity of instructional assistant) Teaching self-monitoring for classroom survival skills or study skills

    20. Fisher & Meyer, 2002; Hollowood et al., 1995; hunt, Farron-Davis et al., 1994; Logan & Malone, 1998; McDonnell et al., 2001; Mills et al., 1998 20 Academic Performance in Inclusive Settings Students with disabilities in inclusive settings displayed: Higher level of engaged behavior in inclusive settings than in segregated settings Slightly less actively engaged behavior than students without disabilities Similar or better scores in developmental assessments than students in segregated settings Increased responding to academic tasks, prompts, and directions

    21. Gilbet et al., 2001; Kliewer & Biklen, 2001; Ryndak et al., 1995; Ryndak et al., 1999 21 Academic Achievement in Inclusive Settings Parents perceived their childrens dramatic growth in communication after the placement in inclusive settings Better acquisition of academic skills and behavior Better maintenance and generalization of academic skills and behavior across time and settings

    22. Dugan et al., 1995; Maheady, et al., 1987; Manset & Semmel, 1997 22 Academic Outcomes for Students without Disabilities Positive gains in basic skills for students without disabilities High school math study showed achievement scores increased by 20 points and the number of students earning an A rose by 40%

    23. Fisher & Meyer, 2002; McDougall & Brady, 1998 23 Academic Outcomes for Students without Disabilities Students increased math fluency and self-monitoring Equal or better norm-referenced test scores

    24. Cole & Meyer, 1991; Giangreco et al., 1993; Hunt, Farron-Davis, et al., 1994 24 Development of Motor Skills for Students with Disabilities IEP goals are met in inclusive environments Acquisition through infused instruction from peers & paraprofessionals Improved motor skills

More Related