100 likes | 188 Views
Evaluation of ALADIN mesoscale precipitation forecasts in the southern Alpine area. (master thesis). Christoph Wittmann. IMG, University of Vienna. Topography. Method.
E N D
Evaluation of ALADIN mesoscale precipitation forecasts in the southern Alpine area (master thesis) Christoph Wittmann IMG, University of Vienna 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck
Topography 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck
Method • Selection of heavy and moderate wintertime/fall precipitation events (1999 – 2003) in connection with a southerly flow → 62 days belonging to 13 periods (duration: 3 – 8 days) • Analysis of typical observed precipitation patterns (rain gauge, areal averages) • Comparison of observed and modelled precipitation patterns, analysis regarding systematical deviations in the different areas • Comparison of observed and modelled inflow soundings (Udine,...) → additional prognostic information? 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck
OBSERVATIONS: TAWES: rain gauge, areal average HZB: rain gauge, areal average Soundings (especially Udine) Weather charts archive (ZAMG, GFS) Radar Data ALADIN-VIENNA (AVI) (resolution: 9.6 km) • Model output (AVI00, AVI12): selected fields • AVI: areal average • Pseudotemps 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck
Areas 24 14 15 25 17 16 18 19 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck
Results (a) Observed precipitation patterns: • Areas 18 and 16 with the highest areal means • Area 17 with the lowest areal means Stations with highest precipitation amounts (52 overall): 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck
Results (b) Observed precipitation pattern: 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck
Results (c) Systematical analysis: 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck
Results (d) OBSERVATION ↔ ALADIN: 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck
Preliminary Conclusions & Outlook • Analysis of observational data gives clear idea regarding primary affected regions in the south of Austria (area, stations) • Observed precipitation pattern with highest variability in eastern part of area 18 and western part of area 19 • Three areas can be outlined, showing significant tendencies with respect to over/underestimation of areal averages • Comparison observation ↔ Aladin reveals existence of a “problem-area” (responsible for major part of underestimation in areas 18 and 19) Information from upstream soundings (observed, modelled) → additional prognostic information ( → “p.a.”) ? • Further analysis: Relation between flow direction, precipitation patterns and deviations observation – Aladin (especially “p.a.”) • Information from radar data → role of convection? 14th Aladin Workshop, Innsbruck