Making Sense and Moving Forward using the School , Family, & Community Partnerships Model:

1. Making Sense and Moving Forward using the School, Family, & Community Partnerships Model: Examples from Ohio

2. Presented by… Barbara Boone, Ph.D. Program Director for Family Engagement Center on Education and Training for Employment The Ohio State University Ohio SPDG Family Engagement Lead

3. Agenda • Theoretical model, key constructs, and process of the National Network of Partnership Schools Model. • Examples of how Ohio’s SPDG has used these constructs and processes • Discussion about how other state SPDG’s have utilized the NNPS model

4. How familiar are you with the National Network of Partnership Schools model?

5. National Network of Partnership Schools Model:The underlying premise

7. Type1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 Type 6 Keys to School, Family, and Community Partnerships EPSTEIN’s FRAMEWORK OF SIX TYPES OF INVOLVEMENT PARENTING Understand child development. Educators know families. COMMUNICATING Two-way. On school programs and children’s progress. VOLUNTEERING At school, in class, at home, and as audiences. LEARNING AT HOME Connections on homework, course choices, other talents. DECISION MAKING All major groups represented on school committees. COLLABORATING WITH COMMUNITY Resources and volunteers from many groups, agencies.

8. Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success Module 2: Respect and Communication

9. Parent Teacher Partnerships:Blended constructs

10. What constructs have your used in your SPDG to categorize family engagement practices?

11. Structure of an Action Team for Partnerships School Improvement Team ACTION TEAM for PARTNERSHIPS Improve Reading PRACTICES from SIX TYPES to meet this goal Improve Math PRACTICES from SIX TYPES to meet this goal Improve Student Attendance PRACTICES from SIX TYPES to meet this goal Improve the Climate for Partnerships PRACTICES from SIX TYPES to meet this goal Academic goal Academic goal Non-Academic goal Partnership goal

12. Plan of Actions Family engagement aligned to goals for student learning and behavior

13. Partnerships for Literacy:Ohio’s SPDG and SSIPFamily Engagement Initiative

14. Process Tools

15. Measuring Growth

16. Current Impact – Cohort I

17. Pike County P4L Team • 14 team members • School leader, regional coaches • Parents/Caregivers: Parent of a child on an IEP, Grandparent, Parent of a Preschooler, Parent on PTO • Literacy-related teaching staff from the school • Community partner from OSU extension

18. Sample Inventory Results

19. Stark County P4L Team • 14 team members • School leaders, regional coaches, family liaisons • Parents/Caregivers: Parent of a child with an IEP, English Learner, Grandparents • Literacy-related teaching staff • Interpreter at every meeting

20. Have you used teams of parents and school personnel to plan family engagement in your SPDG?

21. Let’s talk about your experience implementing the NNPS model. Resources to recommend? Questions for the group?

22. Search: Parent Teacher Partnerships Partnerships for Literacy NNPS

23. THANK YOU! @OhioEngage OhioFamiliesEngage@osu.edu OhioSFEC@osu.edu @OhioEngage