1 / 24

Being a Productive Faculty Scholar at a Teaching Institution

The Importance of Research and Scholarly Activity by a Faculty Member. Required for retention, promotion, tenureEssential for the enhancement of teaching and training studentsImportant for attracting students to the institutionCritical to enhancing the image of an institutionCentral to the moral

dayton
Download Presentation

Being a Productive Faculty Scholar at a Teaching Institution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Being a Productive Faculty Scholar at a Teaching Institution Mark A. Erhart, PhD Professor of Molecular Biology Faculty Associate for Research Excellence Center for Teaching and Research Excellence (CTRE) Chicago State University

    2. The Importance of Research and Scholarly Activity by a Faculty Member Required for retention, promotion, tenure Essential for the enhancement of teaching and training students Important for attracting students to the institution Critical to enhancing the image of an institution Central to the morale of faculty

    3. Research/Scholarly Activity as a Requirement The Departmental Application of Criteria (DAC) for each academic department specifies the minimum requirements for research for every personnel action Especially for junior faculty, familiarity with the research requirements of the DAC is critical

    4. Beyond the DAC: Why Engage in Research? For selfish reasons: Because we love our research, both the process and the outcomes For our students: To be truly educated in a discipline, one must have firsthand experience in applying knowledge to an important problem or question For our institution: To fulfill the mission of an institution

    5. Why Research Often Becomes an Afterthought at Teaching Institutions The stated “primary mission” of the institution is teaching The stated “primary duties” for a faculty member includes teaching, but not research These realities result in: Significantly reduced budgeting for research An infrastructure (physical plant, business offices) not geared to research An external perception (by granting agencies) that research is not a priority for an applicant institution

    6. Barriers to Productive Faculty Research A year-long schedule with a 100% time commitment to teaching/primary duties Significant service commitments (committees, committees, committees) Insufficient support Financial Personnel Physical infrastructure Daunting Bureaucracy

    7. “I can’t find the time…” Strategies for creating year-long schedules that are research-friendly Limiting number of different courses Limiting enrollment in sections Negotiating release time for grant proposal writing

    8. “I can’t find the time…” Strategies for more efficient time management (i.e., more time for research) Choose committee work carefully (I.e., join committees which overlap your research interests Be careful with “open door policies” Be visible enough to attract students to research projects

    9. Finding Institutional Support Offices/Departments designed to enhance research activities Library CTRE/ Technology & Learning Resources Sponsored Programs School of Graduate and Professional Studies Offices/Departments which impact research activities Physical Plant Security/ BERT Purchasing/Accounts Payable Human Resources/Payroll

    10. Navigating the Bureaucracy A daunting institutional bureaucracy can be a major impediment to research The Issues: Access to space (issuing keys) Hiring Personnel (faculty, staff, students) Regulatory Approvals IRB IBC IACUC Fiscal (budgets, reports, auditing)

    11. Strategies for Navigating the Bureaucracy Get to know the personnel in an office/administrative unit Identify the most helpful people and deal with them Hire (or utilize) a person in your department who is skilled at navigation (this reduces your stress level) Learn the rules and know the rules, no matter how inane they seem to be Follow up; keep complete files; keep your own budget records

    12. Intramural Resources Available at CSU Research CUEs Enrichment Grants Program Grants If used properly, these intramural resources can be a springboard to obtaining extramural funding Generating preliminary data is often critical for producing a funded grant proposal

    13. Strategies for Best Use of Intramural Resources Use Research CUEs as release time, not as an override (requires cooperation from Dept. Chair) Have modest goals (e.g., a pilot study to generate preliminary data)

    14. Why is Extramural Funding Important? For the faculty member: Release time/pursuit of passion Career advancement Scheduling freedom/flexibility Summer salary For students: Salary/tuition Practical experience in the discipline For the institution Enhancement of public image Indirect costs

    15. Before Applying for Funding Consult with Department Chair regarding how your duties will be impacted should you receive funding Confirm that institutional resources needed for project (space, computer, personnel, etc.,.) are understood by all parties File “Intent to Submit” paperwork with Sponsored Programs Request letters of support from institutional officials Request release time for proposal writing

    16. Strategies for Obtaining Extramural Funding Identify appropriate potential sources of funding (agencies, foundations, etc.,.) Identify appropriate programs within an agency (pilot programs, young investigator awards, mid-career transition, etc.,.) Contact Program Officers for “inside information” Contact peers who have applied for or received awards from the target program(s) Solicit peer reviewers who will provide candid feedback during the proposal writing process

    17. Strategies for Obtaining Extramural Funding Consult a professional grant writer or consultant, if possible After submission, be patient and resilient (funding rates in some areas are as low as 16%) Don’t take reviewers’ comments personally Address reviewers’ comments and resubmit Be prepared to negotiate budget downward with Agency Program Officer

    18. “I got a grant! Now what?” Communicate regularly with Sponsored Programs regarding reports, audits, time/effort forms, etc.,. Meet with Grant Accountant to review budget, expenditures Meet with Purchasing personnel to learn about on-line ordering, submission of DPVs, travel authorization, etc.,. Negotiate for indirect cost return to your department Publish, publish, publish!

    19. My Perspective 20 years at CSU Hired in 1990 with a negotiated release time of 50% Arrived with a grant sub-contract (NSF) From 1992 to present, 25 - 50% of my AY salary has been from extramural grants Total federal support in grant-years = 36 Training grants have supported summer students (80), research assistants (25), Bridge to PhD students (16), summer faculty (15)

    20. Goals of the CTRE Research Excellence Committee Increase the number of peer-reviewed CSU faculty publications Increase the number of extramural grant proposals submitted by CSU faculty Increase the number of grants awarded to CSU faculty

    21. How to Achieve the Goals Identifying impediments, problems, concerns (faculty surveys, focus groups, workshops) Improving the existing intramural research support mechanisms ( research CUEs, enrichment grants) Establishment of a web site as a faculty research resource (help, FAQs, links) Other ideas

    22. Initial Faculty Research Survey Faculty attendees please complete the survey (home department is the only identifier) Students/Staff/Administrators are welcome to complete a survey (please write “student”, “staff”, or “administrator” on survey form) This survey has been judged by the IRB Chair to be exempt from IRB review

    23. Contact Information Mark A. Erhart Department of Biological Sciences SCI-310 x 2432 merhart@csu.edu

    24. Thanks Tiffany Davis- Associate Coordinator, CTRE Dr. Debrah Jefferson, VP Contract Administration Dr. Sandra Westbrooks, Provost Dr. Floyd Banks, Chair, Biological Sciences CTRE Faculty Associates Khalid Alsamara Rosalind Fielder Liz Osika Brandon Taylor

More Related