180 likes | 205 Views
Explore the growth trends, customer service statistics, engineering updates, and future plans for internet registration services. Learn about current InterNIC statistics, top-level domain distribution, customer service performance, engineering operations, and upcoming RRP system enhancements. Dive into details about registration growth, international registrations, domain updates, and more.
E N D
Registration Services Mark Kosters 10 November 1998
Outline • Current InterNIC Statistics • Customer Service • Engineering • What’s in the Future?
2,777 2,289 1,862 1,541 1,296 1,040 818 627 461 340 246 177 Registration Growth (000’s) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Dec’95 Mar '96 Jun '96 Sept '96 Dec '96 Mar '97 Jun '97 Sept '97 Dec '97 Mar '98 Jun '98 Sep '98 = .NET ., ORG, .EDU Registrations = .COM Net Registrations
International Registrations 138,000 140,000 128,000 120,000 98,000 100,000 81,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 4Q'97 1Q'98 2Q'98 3Q'98
Customer Service • Help Desk • July 14 set a record for incoming calls: 4,142 • Abandonment rates have been around 11% • Time to answer is about 2:00 minutes • Average call duration (once answered) is 5 minutes • Most frequent questions (most common first) • Authentication • How to change a contact • How to change to a new ISP • Status of a domain update
Customer Service (cont.) • Changes • Registrant Name Change • Records here every month • 65% of the requests are correct • New FAQs created • http://rs.internic.net/whats-new.html • Email • 78% answered within 24 hours
Engineering • Operations • Remote Sites • GTLD servers now in London and in Bay Area • Serves .com, .net, and .org only • f.gtld-servers.net • 1200 queries per second • Colo at PAIX • k.gtld-servers.net • Seeing about 1500 queries per second • Colo within Globalcenter’s space • Actively looking for more sites
Engineering (cont.) • Whois searching improved • Improved search scheme • More aggressive with abusers • Average registration turn-around improved • Improved spammer prevention • Improved internal load sharing algorithms
What’s in the Future? • Contract transferred from NSF to DOC • Amendment 11 highlights • Specify a registrar/registry (RRP) system by November 1 • NewCo to appoint 10 people to review RRP by December 1 • Test bed operational by March 31, 1999 for 5 NewCo accredited registrars • Expanded to other registrars by June 1, 1999 • Equal access by October 1, 1999 • Enhancements to Whois • Assist NewCo with details upon request • Operate the a.root-servers.net machine with modifications of root zone to be approved by DOC • Remote Registry Protocol (RRP) • Improved authentication of registrants • Dynamic Update • Secure DNS
Future (cont.) • RRP Details • Very lightweight • Real-time registrations • Only enough information to generate zone files and identify which registrar has what domains • No contact information - held at the registrar level • Why so lightweight? • Internationalization problem moved to registrar • Privacy issues moved to registrar • Can differentiate service between registrars more easily
Future (cont.) • Transport is through SSL • Web interface for registrar reports • Caveat • This all may change
URL • This presentation can be viewed at the following URL: • http://www.netsol.com/nsi/presentations/markk/9811nanog