230 likes | 254 Views
Explore feeding behaviors in different fish species from omnivores to piscivores, comparing mouth structures and prey capture strategies.
E N D
Overview & Comparison of Feeding Mechanisms in Various Fish Species Biology of Fishes October 18, 2012
Fish Species • Hypostomus plecostomus (algae-eater) Teleostei, Loricariidae omnivore • Amphilophus citrinellus (red devil cichlid) Teleostei, Cichlidae carnivore • Lepisosteus osseus (longnose gar) Holostei, Lepisosteidae piscivore • Esox americanus vermiculatus (grass pickerel) Teleostei, Esocidae piscivore • Protopterus annectens (West African lungfish) Dipnoi, Protopteridae omnivore
Prey Item Carassiusauratus
Hypostomus plecostomus • Naturally occurs in South American rivers, feeding on plant material • Sucker mouth with rasping teeth & bony structures • Primarily herbivorous (mainly algae) but will scavenge on dead animal matter • Ventrally flattened for bottom feeding
Hypostomus plecostomus • Scavenging behavior
Amphilophus citrinellus • Naturally occurs in Central American lakes • More ‘typical’ laterally compressed body • Mouth & jaw structure mobile, can be extended to create suction for feeding and nest building • Carnivorous, feeds primarily on snails, insects, smaller fishes
Amphilophus citrinellus • Teeth and bony ridge allow A. citrinellus to crush/eat snails, insects, and fish • Complex mouth morphology allows ‘extension’ to generate suction in capturing prey fish and in moving substrate for nest building
Amphilophus citrinellus • Prey capture utilizing extension of mouth to create suction
Amphilophus citrinellus • Prey capture utilizing extension of mouth to create suction
Amphilophus citrinellus • Mouth morphology also used to move substrate for nest building
Lepisosteus osseus • Naturally occurs in North American lakes and rivers • Elongate, more ancestral body structure • Skull & jaw structure fused, less mobile (compared to teleosts like A. citrinellus) • Primarily piscivorous
Lepisosteus osseus • Elongate (but less mobile) jaw structure and numerous teeth allow capture & grasping of prey fish • L. osseus hunts prey fishes as individuals or in schools; primarily utilizes ‘Pattern B’ attack • L. osseus uses both active hunting and lie and wait tactics
Esox americanus (vermiculatus) • Naturally occurs in North American lakes and rivers • Elongate body structure • Jaws with mobile maxilla, utilize suction and grasping • Primarily piscivorous
Esox americanus • E. americanus utilizes ‘lie & wait’ strategy • Camouflage enhances ambush tactics
Protopterus annectens • Native to West African lake & river systems • One of the ‘most primitive’ fishes • Obligate air-breathers • Lobed fins for locomotion & prey detection • Tooth plates
Conclusions & Discussion • Fishes of various body types and mouth morphologies can utilize different tactics to consume the same type of prey • Which species utilize the different foraging patterns (time minimizing, energy maximizing)? • Which species’ tactics have the most handling time? • Does one type of feeding behavior seem more successful than the others (of the six species observed)?