1 / 23

Feeding Mechanisms in Various Fish Species

Explore feeding behaviors in different fish species from omnivores to piscivores, comparing mouth structures and prey capture strategies.

dduguay
Download Presentation

Feeding Mechanisms in Various Fish Species

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview & Comparison of Feeding Mechanisms in Various Fish Species Biology of Fishes October 18, 2012

  2. Fish Species • Hypostomus plecostomus (algae-eater) Teleostei, Loricariidae omnivore • Amphilophus citrinellus (red devil cichlid) Teleostei, Cichlidae carnivore • Lepisosteus osseus (longnose gar) Holostei, Lepisosteidae piscivore • Esox americanus vermiculatus (grass pickerel) Teleostei, Esocidae piscivore • Protopterus annectens (West African lungfish) Dipnoi, Protopteridae omnivore

  3. Prey Item Carassiusauratus

  4. Hypostomus plecostomus • Naturally occurs in South American rivers, feeding on plant material • Sucker mouth with rasping teeth & bony structures • Primarily herbivorous (mainly algae) but will scavenge on dead animal matter • Ventrally flattened for bottom feeding

  5. Hypostomus plecostomus • Scavenging behavior

  6. Amphilophus citrinellus • Naturally occurs in Central American lakes • More ‘typical’ laterally compressed body • Mouth & jaw structure mobile, can be extended to create suction for feeding and nest building • Carnivorous, feeds primarily on snails, insects, smaller fishes

  7. Amphilophus citrinellus • Teeth and bony ridge allow A. citrinellus to crush/eat snails, insects, and fish • Complex mouth morphology allows ‘extension’ to generate suction in capturing prey fish and in moving substrate for nest building

  8. Amphilophus citrinellus • Prey capture utilizing extension of mouth to create suction

  9. Amphilophus citrinellus • Prey capture utilizing extension of mouth to create suction

  10. Amphilophus citrinellus • Mouth morphology also used to move substrate for nest building

  11. Lepisosteus osseus • Naturally occurs in North American lakes and rivers • Elongate, more ancestral body structure • Skull & jaw structure fused, less mobile (compared to teleosts like A. citrinellus) • Primarily piscivorous

  12. Lepisosteus osseus • Elongate (but less mobile) jaw structure and numerous teeth allow capture & grasping of prey fish • L. osseus hunts prey fishes as individuals or in schools; primarily utilizes ‘Pattern B’ attack • L. osseus uses both active hunting and lie and wait tactics

  13. Lepisosteus osseus

  14. Lepisosteus osseus

  15. Lepisosteus osseus

  16. Esox americanus (vermiculatus) • Naturally occurs in North American lakes and rivers • Elongate body structure • Jaws with mobile maxilla, utilize suction and grasping • Primarily piscivorous

  17. Esox americanus • E. americanus utilizes ‘lie & wait’ strategy • Camouflage enhances ambush tactics

  18. Esox americanus

  19. Protopterus annectens • Native to West African lake & river systems • One of the ‘most primitive’ fishes • Obligate air-breathers • Lobed fins for locomotion & prey detection • Tooth plates

  20. Protopterus annectens

  21. Protopterus annectens

  22. Conclusions & Discussion • Fishes of various body types and mouth morphologies can utilize different tactics to consume the same type of prey • Which species utilize the different foraging patterns (time minimizing, energy maximizing)? • Which species’ tactics have the most handling time? • Does one type of feeding behavior seem more successful than the others (of the six species observed)?

  23. Questions?

More Related