1 / 8

Analyzing Governments' Reactions to Tibet Controversy

Explore how different governments respond to the Tibet issue, considering factors like economic ties and national interests. Analyzing US, Russia, and North Korea's positions and motivations regarding Beijing Olympics and Tibet.

dea
Download Presentation

Analyzing Governments' Reactions to Tibet Controversy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Representation of various governments' reactions and why they take the option to Tibet controversy  Group8(Nagiri, Makijima, Yoshida)

  2. The feature of Our Approach ■We analyze  international aspects of Tibet controversy by looking at the reactions of several governments. ■We also researched  the background of the reason  why that government holds its position.

  3. The reactions of several governments ■United States -the government of the US ignored Chinese options to Tibet and decided to attend Beijing Olympic ■Russia -Russian government supported Chinese options to Tibet and disagree to boycott Beijing Olympic. ■North Korea -Pyongyang said Tibet is part of an inalienable territory of China and denounces independence of Tibet.

  4. Assertion Reaction of each country varies    because of...  its economical relationship between China           its position in the world           its own national interest  not just because of the problem of human rights

  5. background--case of the United States the government of the US ignored Chinese options to Tibet  and decided to attend Beijing OlympicThis is because ↓ The US is afraid of China becoming too influential  in the world politics  but 　　　○China is third-largest trade partner for the US (2005,US statistics)  ○the US leans more on China trade (CEIC,Goldman Sachs)

  6. background--case of Russia Russian government supported Chinese options to Tibet and disagree to boycott Beijing OlympicThis is because ↓ Russia have Chechen problem and they experieced Moscow Oympic boicott

  7. background--case of North Korea Pyongyang said Tibet is part of an inalienable territory of China and denounces independence of Tibet. This is because ↓ North Korea is isolated in international society China is one of the closest countries to DPRK

  8. Assertion goverment's reaction to Tibet controversy and Beijing Olympics ↑ various factors other than human rights ■We should speculate the background of the country's option                      comapare with other countries opinion

More Related