190 likes | 414 Views
Designing tools for enhanced monitoring of railway safety performance of the European Union and its Member States. Vojtech EKSLER & Cecilia LIND Safety Unit. Part I: Introducing SMS for Europe. Introduction (1). “You cannot manage what you cannot measure.” Kelvin, Kaplan
E N D
Designing tools for enhanced monitoring of railway safety performance of the European Union and its Member States Vojtech EKSLER & Cecilia LIND SafetyUnit
Part I: • Introducing SMS for Europe
Introduction (1) • “You cannot manage what you cannot measure.” • Kelvin, Kaplan • …so you cannot improve what you cannot monitor. • Railway safety management in Europe has been evolving into a three management layer system (Railway Undertakings, National Safety Authorities, ERA) with each having distinct responsibilities. • Tools for each levels are needed for effective management.
Introduction (2) Safety monitoring through outcomes: Fatal train collisions and derailments per billion train-km in the EU
Introduction (3) • PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION • Less than ten fatal train collisions and derailments per year at EU level. • With continuous improvement in railway safety, relying on accident data becomes unsustainable. • Difficult to improve the system with accident data only (reactive approach). • EU and national regulators rely on analytical approaches that is only one element of system approach to safety.
SMS for Europe (1) • Concept of an SMS applied until now only at the operators’ level to be extended to national (MSs) and supranational (EU) level. • Hazards are not always limited geographically and sometimes their identification may only be possible when considering relevant data available across the EU. • SMS for Europe should add value, not replace the existing system at national level.
SMS for Europe (2) • First building blocks of the European SMS: • EU/National safety plans • Enabling legal framework currently under discussion with MSs • Common database of occurrences • Top-level occurrences to be mandatory shared at EU level, lower-level occurrences reported in a harmonized way • Enhanced monitoring • Enhanced monitoring of outcomes and system monitoring (regulatory regime).
Enhanced monitoring • Two parts: Outcomes monitoring and regulatory regime monitoring I II
Enhanced monitoring of outcomes • Current legal framework for outcomes reporting in the EU • Based on a study for ERA by TRL (UK)
Part II: • Monitoring regulatory regime performance
Theoretical basis • Stems from modern management theories, notably Stewhart’s cycle for continuous improvements and quality control • Other sources: ISO standards, safety management in othersectors, studyby DNV for ERA
Example of application (2) 2.1 Establishment and responsibilities
Areas for use • Prioritise ERA tasks • Input to safety analysis (trends) • Voluntary health checks of individual MSs • Input to work-streams and missions • Impact assessments
Timing • PART I: • New legal framework in 2014 • Preparatory works ongoing • PART II • Currently running a pilot with 5 countries • Evaluation by summer 2014
Thankyou for your attention! • Contact: • Vojtech.EKSLER@era.europa.eu • +33 (0)3 27 09 65 75 • Cecilia.LIND@era.europa.eu • +33 (0)3 27 09 67 38 • http://www.era.europa.eu/Core-Activities/Safety/Pages/Home.aspx