1 / 9

Methodologies for Tracking Refugees Longitudinally

This report provides a comprehensive review of methodologies for tracking refugees longitudinally, including an analysis of literature, research methodology, and findings. It also includes case studies from different states and offers recommendations for effective practices in tracking refugee outcomes.

debner
Download Presentation

Methodologies for Tracking Refugees Longitudinally

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Methodologies for Tracking Refugees Longitudinally Prepared By: Brandon DeBot David Lumbert Roanna Wang Nina Brekelmans Eric Yang Nationwide Analysis and Policy Options The contents of this report were developed under grant P116B100070 from the U.S. Department of Education. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

  2. Overview • What is longitudinal tracking • Rationale • Foundations for analysis

  3. Literature Review • History • Trends and Findings • Employment is most important outcome factor • Very little longitudinal tracking • Qualitative factors crucial • Innovative programs limited

  4. Research Methodology & Findings • Categorization: • 0: No tracking • 1: Tracking up to 8 months – minimal level required by ORR • 2: Tracking between 8 and 12 months • 3: Tracking beyond 12 months with additional outcome factors

  5. How New Hampshire Compares: Fifty State Analysis NH

  6. Fifty State Analysis • Size • Refugee Population • Region

  7. Case Studies • Alaska • Assessment form, quarterly “All Refugee Meeting” • Georgia • Statewide tracking database • Illinois • Aggregate client profiles • Missouri • “Penelope:” Automated tracking program • Minnesota • Web-based management program with six domains

  8. Moving Forward • Successful Measures • Employment Outcomes • Qualitative Outcomes Ex. Mental Health • Effective Practices • Aggregate Databases • Inter-organizational Profiles

  9. Thank You • Questions?

More Related