110 likes | 246 Views
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010. INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010. LECTURE 2 ACTS OF BANKRUPTCY To obtain a sequestration order, creditor has to prove that debtor has committed in act of bankruptcy within 6 months before presentation of a creditor’s petition - s 43(1)(a) , s 44(1)
E N D
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 LECTURE 2 ACTS OF BANKRUPTCY • To obtain a sequestration order, creditor has to prove that debtor has committed in act of bankruptcy within 6 months before presentation of a creditor’s petition - s 43(1)(a) , s 44(1) • What is an “act of bankruptcy” ? Look at s 40(1) • In most cases the act of bankruptcy is failure to comply with the terms of a bankruptcy notice - 40(1)(g)
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 Court judgment Issue and service of bankruptcy notice Failure to comply = act of bankruptcy Typical sequence of events: Presentation of creditor’s petition Court hearing Court makes sequestration order
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 S 40(1) A debtor commits an act of bankruptcy in each of the following cases: …………………………. (g) if a creditor who has obtained against the debtor a final judgment or final order, being a judgment or order the execution of which has not been stayed, has served on the debtor in Australia or, by leave of the Court, elsewhere, a bankruptcy notice under this Act and the debtor does not: (i) where the notice was served in Australia—within the time specified in the notice; or (ii) where the notice was served elsewhere—within the time fixed for the purpose by the order giving leave to effect the service; comply with the requirements of the notice or satisfy the Court that he or she has a counter‑claim, set‑off or cross demand equal to or exceeding the amount of the judgment debt or sum payable under the final order, as the case may be, being a counter‑claim, set‑off or cross demand that he or she could not have set up in the action or proceeding in which the judgment or order was obtained;
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 FORMAL REQUIREMENTS • A bankruptcy notice shall be in Form 1 - s 41(2) [Nichols 126] • Reg 4.02 [Nichols 662] prescribes Form 1 • Form 1 is found in Schedule 1 to the Bankruptcy Regulations [Nichols 817] • Application is made to the Official Receiver for the issue of a notice - Reg 4.01 [Nichols 661]
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 • It must correctly state the amount of the debt • It must give the debtor sufficient time (usually 21 days) to pay the debt • It must nominate a place for payment • It must be based upon a final judgment or order s 40(1)(g) • The execution of the judgment or order must not have been stayed - s 40(1)(g) • The claim must be for more than $2,000 - s 41(1)(a)
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 SERVICE • In accordance with Reg 16.01 [Nichols 708]: • sent to last-known address • left in envelope at DX • left at last known address • served personally • sent by fax or other electronic mode • Substituted service - s 309(2) [Nichols 626] • Must be served within 6 months of issue -Reg 4.02A [Nichols 662]
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 DEFECTS OR IRREGULARITIES • s 306 [Nichol 622] • Kleinwort Benson Australia v Crowl (1988) 165 CLR 71 at 77 • substantive defects - essential requirements - misleading the debtor • Adams v Lambert (2006) 228 CLR 409 • Bankruptcy notices will be construed strictly - Re Walsh (1982) 47 ALR 751: “A bankruptcy notice sets in motion the whole process leading to bankruptcy and must, since the proceedings are of a quasi-penal nature, be construed strictly.”
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 CHALLENGING BANKRUPTCY NOTICES • Bankruptcy law is often highly technical, and occasionally far removed from common sense” - Kyriackou 138 FCR 324 • Application to set aside judgment on which notice is based - s 41(6A)(a) • Application to extend time for compliance with the notice - s 41(6A)(b) • Application to set aside a defective notice • defect is substantial not formal • defect is capable of reasonably misleading the debtor • overstatement of amount - s 41(5), (6) • examples of invalid notices - Nichols 129-134
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 COUNTER-CLAIM, SET-OFF OR CROSS-DEMAND • quantum must be equal to or exceed the judgment debt - s 40(1)(g) • must be a counter-claim which could not have been set up in original proceedings - s 40(1)(g) • extension of time for compliance pending challenge on ground of a cross-claim - s 41(7) • the debtor must show that he has a prima facie case - Ebert v Union Trustee (1960) 104 CLR 346 • court must weigh up the merit of the counter-claim with the justice or allowing bankruptcy proceedings to go ahead or be stayed -Guss v Johnstone [2000] HCA 26
INSOLVENCY SUMMER 2009/2010 Next week: Lecture 3 Creditors’ Petitions & Debtors’ Petitions Reading: • Keays,46-53, 68-77 • Bankruptcy Act, ss 43, 52, 55 • Nichols 147-192 Course of a Hearing