1 / 4

Final Project Description

Final Project Description. Jimmy Lin College of Information Studies University of Maryland. Project Deliverables. In-class presentation (May 8, 2006) 10 minutes for a project of one 5 additional minutes for each additional group member Hand-in report (due May 8, 2006)

decima
Download Presentation

Final Project Description

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Final Project Description Jimmy Lin College of Information Studies University of Maryland

  2. Project Deliverables • In-class presentation (May 8, 2006) • 10 minutes for a project of one • 5 additional minutes for each additional group member • Hand-in report (due May 8, 2006) • Short enough to convey the ideas, but no shorter

  3. Content • The project can be on anything related to information retrieval, broadly construed • Some ideas: • “Experimental track” – evaluate some aspect of a retrieval system • “Survey track” – discuss a few papers about a particular area in information retrieval

  4. Grading Breakdown • Presentation (3 points) • Did you clearly convey what you did? • Did you stay within time limits? • Content of report and presentation (5 points) • Did you clearly state your question? • Did you clearly describe your method for answering the question? • Did you actually answer the question? • Bonus: is there anything that can be generalized or learned from these results? • For surveys: does the report demonstrate integrative understanding of the papers surveyed? • Quality of writing (2 points) • Is the report well-written and easy to read?

More Related