1 / 9

Open access and libraries

Eric Lease Morgan University Libraries of Notre Dame October 25, 2004. History Librarianship Open access and open source Q & A Discussion. Open access and libraries. History, a personal perspective. Journal of Anesthesiology ARL Collection Analysis Project Stevan Harnad

deiondre
Download Presentation

Open access and libraries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Eric Lease Morgan University Libraries of Notre Dame October 25, 2004 History Librarianship Open access and open source Q & A Discussion Open access and libraries

  2. History, a personal perspective • Journal of Anesthesiology • ARL Collection Analysis Project • Stevan Harnad • Psycoloquy, PACS Review, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, Postmodern Culture, etc. • Mr. Serials • World Wide Web

  3. History (continued) • Commercial electronic journals and the Big Deal • SPARC • OAI • Budapest Open Access Initiative • Public Library of Science and BioMed Central

  4. History (last slide) • “green” and “gold” open access • Peter Suber • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) • DOAJ Index • Governments taking notice

  5. Open access and librarianship • Building relationships • Collecting open access titles • Organizing open access titles • Archiving open access titles • Preserving open access titles • Providing access to open access titles

  6. Open access and open source software • Both are “free as a free kitten” • Both of their deliverables are “public goods” • Both require a set of new and different skills • Both rely on peer-review

  7. Q & A

  8. Discussion: What can we do? • COAPP with the issue • Evangelize • Prioritize the development of new skills • Implement LOCKSS • Implement institutional repository • Build relationships and trust

  9. The End Eric Lease Morgan University Libraries of Notre Dame emorgan@nd.edu

More Related