1 / 23

Understanding the women and water relationship

5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 . 2. . Is water a women's question?Why is it so?. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 . 3. Why women and water. Water is a crucial means of production and source of lifeAll socially disadvantaged groups therefore ne

deiondre
Download Presentation

Understanding the women and water relationship

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 1 Understanding the women and water relationship Seema Kulkarni SOPPECOM, Pune, India

    2. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 2 Is water a women’s question? Why is it so?

    3. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 3 Why women and water Water is a crucial means of production and source of life All socially disadvantaged groups therefore need to have access to means of production Equal citizens argument Women’s presence in the water related work is high

    4. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 4 Gender Analysis- An exercise Analysis of activities around water: who does what? Farming, Domestic, Other paid jobs, politics Analysis of water resources: who owns what? Access, ownership; Control: the power to decide whether and how a resource is used Analysis of benefits and incentives who controls/has access to the benefits outputs of production Analysis of who decides the rules- power structures

    5. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 5 Women and water- relationship- special one Access/control Activities Rule making process benefits

    6. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 6 Right to Water Water entitlements Water technology and infrastructure and Voice or decision making in the water related institutions are mostly vested in men (some)

    7. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 7 Water knowledge Mostly technocentric where infrastructure and its management are seen as central Women’s water related work is invisible in the current water paradigm Women, dalits, gender relations or equity in general do not feature as part of the core debates of water thinking

    8. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 8 Tracing history- key trends Women as victims of degradation of nature and water scarcity Women as privileged knowers Women as solutions to the problem Theoretical underpinnings in the ecofeminist thinking- essentialist and material basis Feminist environmentalism and feminist political ecology- dynamic relationship of women with nature and women as diverse

    9. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 9 Tracing history …. The 80’s were characterized by emerging advocacy in women’s leadership in environmental action. Emphasis on special relationship with nature This had a tremendous impact in setting development agendas. Women were seen as privileged knowers and therefore the solution to the problem rather than merely victims.

    10. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 10 Ecofeminism Both these were informed by the varying trends in the ecofeminist thinking close connection between women and nature based on a shared history of oppression by patriarchal institutions and dominant western culture as well as positive identification by women with nature. Ecofeminist thinking had various strands within it-essentialist, ideological and material basis for domination of women and nature

    11. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 11 How are women visualised Women first seen as the victims affected by the environmental crisis Then seen as the solution because of their natural roles as care takers and nurturers

    12. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 12 How it translated into programmes Because women are the victims and because they are also the privileged knowers they need to be integrated into environmental regeneration programmes- participation leads to efficiency Soil building planting trees, afforestation programmes, nurseries, energy efficient stoves community water management projects –increased burden on women’s work without challenging existing division of Labour

    13. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 13 Dominant assumptions male and female sector Women are home makers, nurturers and carers of natural resources and hence they should be seen in those very roles in the water sector. Women’s domain therefore remains that of domestic water sector- collecting and using that water for the welfare of the family. Men’s domain is seen in the productive sphere or the irrigation sector. This is considered as a natural extension of their work of value addition and surplus generation.

    14. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 14 Approaches for gender water advocacy Welfare Instrumentalist efficiency

    15. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 15 Emerging Critiques The 90’s saw a lot of critiques of these ecofeminist and WED approaches- older concerns of women’s relationship with nature have now been recast in terms of their property rights

    16. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 16 Feminist Environmentalism Feminist environmentalism emphasized the material aspects of gender-environment relationships. Interests in particular resources and ecological processes are shaped by the roles and responsibilities that men and women are engaged in on a daily basis-(BinaAgarwal)

    17. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 17 Feminist Political ecology Feminist political ecology draws on works from political ecology and from various lessons in the gender and environment debates. It draws attention to questions of gendered knowledge, access and control over resources and the engagement between local struggles and global issues.(Rochleau et al)

    18. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 18 What did they highlight? Women’s relationship with the environment emerging from the social context of dynamic gender relations challenging the notion of a natural affinity They unpacked women as a homogenous category- relationships with nature differ for different categories of women

    19. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 19 What did they highlight? Shifting of focus from roles to relationships these critiques pointed out relations of tenure and property , and control over labour resources decisions shape people’s environmental interests and opportunities Both these critiques highlighted the property relations and the need to look at informal practices and arrangements in property that underlie the formal arrangements.

    20. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 20 What did they highlight? They also challenged the notion that women’s participation is equivalent to benefit for women. Saving the environment can become an additional burden for women thereby reinforcing regressive gender roles or not challenging existing gender roles They highlighted the need for progressive or enhanced gender equity

    21. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 21 New approaches Equity and empowerment

    22. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 22 Where do we go from here What will our goals be? How will we achieve them (different approaches equity, welfare, efficiency) What are our major constraints in doing so (gender intersects with caste, class other social differences- so can we build shared interests?)

    23. 5th Biennal GEF conference 26-29 Oct 2009 23 Way forward Assess the status of women’s access to water and decision making across diverse social groups- GEG-Levels of contestation across domains calls for a restructuring of the water sector on sustainable, equitable and democratic lines

More Related