1 / 19

Administrative Law

Administrative Law. Administrative Law . Controls the exercise of governmental power by administrative agencies. Controls the way in which agencies develop, administer and enforce their authority. Principles are the basis for legal remedies for those aggrieved by administrative actions. .

deirdra
Download Presentation

Administrative Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Administrative Law

  2. Administrative Law • Controls the exercise of governmental power by administrative agencies. • Controls the way in which agencies develop, administer and enforce their authority. • Principles are the basis for legal remedies for those aggrieved by administrative actions.

  3. Separation of powers • Legislative power • Essential function is make laws (statutes, ordinances) • Ex: Congress; Legislature; City Council • Executive power • Essential function is administer programs • Ex: President; Governor; Mayor • Judicial power • Essential function is resolve disputes (adjudicate) • Ex: Federal courts; State courts; hearing examiners

  4. Agencies • Agencies (federal, state, local, regional) • Agencies combine all powers in one body • Legislate: adopt regulations • Adjudicate: hold administrative hearings • Administer: develop policies; issue permits; enforce

  5. Some Fundamentals (from Fox) • Agencies are creation of legislature – enabling legislation • Often have considerable discretion in carrying out their functions (rulemaking, adjudication) • Courts have assumed a limited role in reviewing agency actions

  6. Limits on agency power • Statutory delegation (via enabling act, substantive statute) • Statute must delegate adequately (what are limits to power? who does what, when) • Example: Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act • Procedural controls • Administrative Procedures Acts (APA) • Federal APA (5 USC 551 et seq); • State APA (Ch. 34.05 RCW); • Local APA (e.g. Seattle Municipal Code )

  7. Other limits to agency power • Executive: appointments, budgets and audits, • Legislative: approve appointments, review rules, agency sunsetting provisions • Judicial review

  8. Agency Rulemaking • RCW 34.05.010(16) - a rule means any agency order, directive or regulation of general applicability • the violation of which subjects a person to a penalty or sanction; • which establishes, alters, or revokes any procedure relating to agency hearings or the enjoyment of benefits or privileges conferred by law; • which establishes qualifications for the issuance, suspension or revocation of licenses; or • which establishes mandatory standards for any product or material that must be met before sale.

  9. What is an agency action?Fox: Section 104(a) • Federal APA • includes the whole or a part of an agency rule, order, license, sanction, relief, or the equivalent or denial thereof, or failure to act • RCW 34.05.010(3) • licensing, the implementation or enforcement of a statute, the adoption or application of an agency rule or order, the imposition of sanctions, or the granting or withholding of benefits.

  10. Agency Rulemaking RequirementsAPA and RCW • Notice of rule/intent • Opportunity to comment • Response to comments • Publication of resulting rule

  11. Enforcement Response Process • Informal • Notice of Violation • Formal • Administrative Order, Consent Order • Civil • Referral, Complaint, Consent Decree • Settlements • Pertains to Admin and Civil Cases • Core Concept: Timely and Appropriate Response to High Priority Violators

  12. Penalty Matrix - Civil and Admin • Looks at: • Potential for harm • Extent of deviation from requirements • Up to statutory limits • Also factors in: • Good faith efforts • Degree of willfulness/negligence • History of non-compliance • Ability to pay • Economic benefit of non-compliance

  13. Admin Hearings • EPA files complaint, lodged with hearings clerk • Lists violations • Penalty according to penalty matrix + injunctive relief • Defendant responds • EPA/defendant hold regular conferences to resolve/settle • Nationally - 400 cases per year - Average penalty 170k • Typical timeframe from filing to decision - 18 months

  14. Admin Hearings con’t • EPA both prosecutor and judge • Prohibitions on ex parte communications • Hearings may be held in DC, Region or Defendant’s county • Witnesses, exhibits similar to civil, but Rules of Evidence are more informal • Trials generally last just a few days • At end, EPA, Defendant offer opposing findings of fact/conclusions of law, proposed order, supporting briefs

  15. ALJ Process (con’t) • Presiding officer issues ”Initial Decision” • All material issues of law or discretion • Proposed penalty, explanation of why it differs from EPA’s (if that is the cae) • Decision becomes final unless • either party files motion to reopen within 45 days • Motion to appeal within 30 days

  16. Environmental Appeals Board • Provides for orderly review of important issues of law prior to federal court review • Latter done typically pursuant to Administrative Procedures Act • Usually response to motion to appeal ALJ decision • Board composed of four members • Panel of three typically hears a case • Review is de novo • Final decision last step in admin process

  17. Court Challenges • Final agency action? (impose obligation, deny right, fix legal relationship) • Exhaust administrative remedies? • Standing?: • Statutory standing (“any person”?) • If silent, then general standing (wikipedia)

  18. Challenge of Agency Rule • Violation of APA or other procedural statute (2 years) – i.e. messed-up notice, comment, publish? • Ultra vires? – exceeded authority delegated by statute BUT always deference to agency action within delegated expertise • Violation of Constitution? • Irrational decision-maker? (arbitrary and capricious)

  19. Grounds to Challenge Agency Adjudication • All of the same claims as rulemaking challenges, plus • Agency has erroneously interpreted or applied the law? • Insufficient evidence? • Agency’s order inconsistent with rule?

More Related