National Team System Engineering Overview

1. National Team System Engineering Overview CAPT P. M. GRANT III System Engineering & Integration Missile Defense Agency 8 June 2004

2. MDA SYSTEM ENGINEERING CHALLENGE • Near-Term Deployment – Initial Defensive Operations • Engineering Challenge Dictates Use of Unified National Team • Open Consideration of All Solutions • Synergy of Distributed Sensors and Weapons • Element Alignment with BMDS Goals • Layered System • Network Centric Battle Management Ballistic Missile Defense on Alert, All Phases, All Ranges, All Regions

3. EVOLVED MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAM Requirements-Based Acquisition Under ABM Treaty Capability-Based Acquisition After ABM Treaty Integrated, Layered BMDS (MDAP) Family of Theater Systems (FoS) Strategic Defense Command & Control Battle Management Sensors Boost Elements / Components Communications Terminal Elements / Components Midcourse Elements / Components .. MDAP 1 (THAAD) MDAP 2 (NTW) MDAP (NMD) Theater Defense Strategic Defense Defense of All Threats • Each MDAP Optimized to Own ORD • FoS Secondary • Aggregate FoS Performance • Synergistic, Limited Interoperability • Each MDAP “Massive” • Momentum, Culture, Resources • Service Orientation • Top-Down SE&I to “Component” Level • Optimize BMD System Performance • Disciplined, Quick, Flexible Change Management • Annual Procurement and Fielding Decisions to Desired Capabilities

4. NATIONAL TEAMMANAGEMENT MODEL OPTIONS Government / Industry National Team Independent National Industry Industry Government Industry Prime Team Prime Government Government Government Government Government FFRDC FFRDC FFRDC FFRDC FFRDC Government Independent Team Lead Prime Government Contractor FFRDC FFRDC Team Lead National Team National Team KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR KTR BMDS Requires Unified Government / Industry National Team

5. ALIGNED MISSILE DEFENSE NATIONAL TEAM GUIDANCE • National Team Focus – High Performance and Engineering Excellence • National Team Commitment – Examine the Total Spectrum of Engineering Solutions • Responsible and Accountable for Design and Integration of Defense System on Alert for Ballistic Missiles in All Phases of Flight that Grows to Protect All Regions from All Ranges • Government, SETA, FFRDC and Industry Committed to Provide “Best and Brightest” Team; Aligned into a Collaborative Work Environment; Organized by Functional Working Groups • Leadership of Functional Working Groups Selected from Across National Team Based on Leadership and Knowledge • MDNTS has Total System Performance Responsibility

6. “MULTI-SPIRAL” BMDSSYSTEM ENGINEERING PROCESS BMDS System Engineering Verification & Assessment (Cycle as Needed) Integration Engineering (Moderate Cycle) BMDS on Alert Architecture Engineering (Rapid Cycle) Input / Guidance • Capabilities-Based Systems Engineering Guidance • MDA / AT&L / OSD / Congress • Technology Investments • Block n Investments • BMDS Deployments • Rhythms, Spirals, And Simultaneity Engineering Management and Control

7. System Engineering Council NATIONAL TEAM (NT) FUNCTIONAL GROUPS NT CAPT P. M. Grant III D. Mays K. Medlin System Engineering Integration Group • Government • Industry • SETAs • FFRDC + UARC NTC Concept Engineering NTD Design & Specification Engineering NTI Implementation & Software Engineering NTV Verification & Assessment Engineering • Mr. K. Bell • Dr. S. Collins • Mr. J. Dyer • Dr. R. Francois • Dr. E. Gerry • Mr. S. Groenig • Mr. D. Lally • Mr. B. Lindeman • Mr. D. Mitchell • Dr. D. Nihiser • Dr. J. O’Pray Col Juday F. Powell K. Miga S. Hertz C. Kerr B. Paddon D. Apo C. Camealy NTT Threat Systems Engineering NTZ System Analysis NTY Risk Engineering NTQ Program Cost and Investment Analysis (Matrix with PI) G. Niva J. Wells S. Falatko S. Galagaza Y. Fiske J. Fitzgerald J. Maurer O. Diaz NTP Program Management & Control NTB C2BMC SE (Matrix with BC) A. Hemphill R. Blanks B. Caffall CAPT Stiltner

8. MDA SYSTEM ENGINEERING Concept Engineering (NTC) • Expand and Update the BMDS Technical Objectives and Goals (TOG) Based on Alternative Future Architecture Studies • Develop System Evolution Plan • Develop Block Data Packages Containing Threat Definition, System Architecture, Sub-System Descriptions, Possible Engagement Sequence Groups (ESGs), and Predicted System Performance Design Engineering (NTD) • Develop System Capability Specification (SCS) • Develop Block Interface Control Specifications (ICS) Implementation and Software Engineering (NTI) • Provide Block System Integration Strategy, Plan, and Planning Allocation Matrix • Configuration Control through Strict Adherence to Configuration Control Board Procedures • Provide the Software Acquisition Program Plan (SWAP) and the Software Readiness Levels (SWRLs) Verification and Assessment Engineering (NTV) • Provide Block Capability Verification and Assessment Plan and Report, Test Objectives, and Target Requirements Enabling Engineering • Update Adversary Capability Document (ACD) (NTT) • BMD System Risk Management (NTY) • System Analysis for All System Engineering Functions (NTZ)

9. BMDS CORNERSTONES • Reaction Time • First Detect to First Missile Movement • Raid Size Capacity • Number of Threats Destroyed • Availability and Reliability • Continuous Availability • Area Defended / Area Denied • Defended Area • TBMD Launch Area Denied • Countermeasures & Environmental Resistance Battle Space is Driven by the Cornerstones

10. BMDS ENGAGEMENT CHARACTERIZATION • BMDS Battle Space, Intercept Window, Reaction Time, and Raid Size Capacity BMDS Battle Space Reaction Time BMDS Intercept Window Incoming Ballistic Missile Desired PES First Detect First Shot Opportunity First Intercept Opportunity Kill Assessment Last Shot Opportunity Last Intercept Opportunity Drop Track . . . Engagement Success (PES ) . 1 2 Sensor Sites / Types N . 2 1 . Raid Size Capacity at Desired PES WeaponSites / Types . M BMDS Sensors BMDS Weapons Number of RVs

11. Threat Missile Taxonomy Range SHORT RANGE SHORT RANGE SHORT RANGE No Ascent Shroud No Ascent Shroud No Ascent Shroud Plume Radiant Intensity SRV SRV Non Non Separating Separating - - SRV SRV Non Non - - Separating Guided Guided Unguided Unguided Guided Guided Unguided Unguided RV Re-Entry Velocity Guided Guided Unguided Unguided Guided Guided Unguided Unguided ACM Sep ACM Sep ACM Non ACM Non Sep Sep - - No ACS No ACS ACS ACS No ACS No ACS ACM Sep ACM Sep ACM Non ACM Non Sep Sep - - No ACS No ACS ACS ACS No ACS No ACS Spin Spin Spin Spin Maneuvering Maneuvering Spin Spin Tumbling Tumbling Maneuvering Maneuvering Tumbling or Tumbling or Stabilized Stabilized Stabilized Stabilized Roll Stabilized Roll Stabilized Stabilized Stabilized Spinning Spinning Number of Objects Spin Spin Spin Spin Maneuvering Roll Stabilized Maneuvering Spin Spin Tumbling Tumbling Maneuvering Maneuvering Tumbling or Tumbling or Stabilized Stabilized Stabilized Stabilized Stabilized Stabilized Spinning Spinning BMDS AVD BMDS ACD ADVERSARY CHARACTERIZATION Parametric Adversary Capability Midcourse BMDS Layers Adversary Capabilities Boost Terminal Adversary Vignettes

12. BOOST PHASE ADVERSARYCAPABILITY EXAMPLE Parameter – Physics-Based Burnout Velocity Space Physics Limit Cannot Yet be Engineered Velocities from Known Missile Systems Current Capability Burnout Velocity Determined Based on Engineering Feasibility Burnout Altitude

13. SYSTEM EVOLUTION PLAN (SEP) • SecDef Guidance, Director’s Intent, and Guide Star Provide Initial and End State Vision for the BMDS • Near Term – Defensive Presence in All Missions, All Phases of Flight • Far Term – Robust, Complementary Defenses for All Missions, All Ranges, All Engagement Phases Despite Countermeasures • The Long-Term Vision, Translated into Qualitative and Quantitative Terms, Drives the Top-Down BMDS Evolution Plan – the SEP Decision Space (Cost, Schedule, Capability) SpaceBased KE Boost Edge ofSpace Capability Terrestrial Cost Block 06 Time The SEP will Explore Alternative Paths / Strategies to Achieve TOG Compliance

14. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT PROCESS BMDS Vision “Guide Star” Block -- Develop Future Configurations Block -- Block -- Block -- • Identify Step Wise Process to Design, Develop and Test BMDS Based on Future Configurations Block 06 Identify Capability Gaps Block 04 IDO

15. Engagement Sequences Occur when BMDS Components are Employed to Perform Detect-Control-Engage Functions All Engagement Sequence Groups Consist of Sensor for Surveillance / Initial Detection and Tracking Sensor for Weapon Launch Sensor or Source for Engagement Support Target Designation / Selection Launcher / Missile or Directed Energy Weapon ENGAGEMENT SEQUENCE GROUPS Surveillance / Initial Track Weapon Launch Sensor Target Designation Weapon Engagement Support Sensor Engagement Sequences Enabled by Command and Control, Battle Management, and Fire Control Functions

16. IDC BMDS BLOCK DIAGRAM

17. Space Based Space Based KE KE Boost Boost Edge Of Space Capability Terrestrial Block Cost 06 Time BMDS TECHNOLOGY INSERTIONFUELS BLOCK EVOLUTION 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Block 2014 • Plan • Execute • Adjust MDA Corporate Feedback Block 2012 Block 2010 Evolutionary Spiral Development Block 2008 Block n Pull and Technology Push Block 2006 Technology Insertion Block 2004 Sensor and Discrimination Algorithms Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations Decision Architecture Upgrades “Next Generation” Radars Kill Vehicle and Seeker Improvements System Evolution Plan

18. SYSTEM ENGINEERING & INTEGRATION MISSILE DEFENSE NATIONAL TEAM Top Priorities • IDO BMDS on Alert • BMDS Design • IDO Capability Verification • Define BMDS Blocks 08 /10 • Perform Concept Studies • PEER Review Process • Baseline Blocks • Design BMDS Block 06 • Achieve a Quantum Jump in BMDS Integration • Begin Evolution Away from Purely Autonomous Systems Performing a Function Not Possible with Any of the Elements Acting Alone

19. BACKUP

20. SE&I GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION- ACQ DEMO - MDA Chief Engineer Deputy Chief Engineer CAPT P. M. Grant, III W. D. Mays System Engineering Integration Group System Engineering Advisory Council SEV Verification & Assessment Engineering SEC Concept Engineering SED Design & Specification Engineering SEI Implementation & Software Engineering Dr. D. Nihiser Mr. J. O’Pray COL Brown (Jun 04) • Government • Industry • SETAs • FFRDC + UARC Col G. Juday Ms. K. Miga Mr. M. Nelson Mr. M. Gibson • Architecture • Integration • Verification & Assessment Lt Col B. Cummings Vacant (O-4) R. Lake T. Kline R. Coley P. Bigelman D. Throckmorton D. Campbell Vacant (III) Vacant (III) Vacant (III) G. Bassett D. Moore T. Still Vacant (IV) F. Stierwalt A. Gardner A. DeRobles Vacant (O-4) Lt Col Amon SET Threat Systems Engineering SEZ System Analysis SEY Risk Engineering SEJ Modeling & Simulation Dr. J. Randorf (Acting) / Mr. M. Young (TDY/Training) Mr. J. Wells Mr. J. Mosora Dir - Vacant Lt Col K. Wilson M. Owens G. Kalansky Vacant (IV) Vacant (III) Vacant (III)Vacant (III) B. Lollie (Active Duty) LTC Cook LCDR Bellamy H. Heckathorn J. Hall H. Clark C. Nguyen A. Roberts C. Lind G. Cord M. Love Vacant (IV) SEP Program Management & Control SEQ Program Cost & Investment Analysis (Matrix with PI) A. Hemphill J. Maurer T. Koufas P. Smith J. Jimenez E. Mayo J. Boyd S. Bodensteiner CT Support T. Bowden C. Hines M. Lee T. Pierpoint J. Seaton

21. MDNTS FUNCTIONAL WORKING GROUP CHARTER NTC Concept Engineering NTD Design & Specification Engineering NTI Implementation & Software Engineering NTV Verification & Assessment Engineering NTT Threat Systems Engineering • System Evolution Engineering and International Programs • TOG – Development & Maintenance • SEP – Development & Maintenance • Develops the Proposed Architecture / Block Structures • CM/CCM (Rainbow) • Blue Team • Technology Requirements • Performs the Detailed BMDS Engineering, Given an Architecture Construct • Performs Engineering Necessary to Establish and Document the BMDS Specifications • Standards • Specialty Engineering • Information Assurance Design • Performs Detailed Engineering to Implement the Design • Software Engineering • Performs Configuration Management for BMDS • Performs Risk Mitigation Activities • Configuration Change Board (CCB) • Monitors TPMs • All Verification and Assessment Activities • Verification of Compliance with Mandated Processes • Assessment Activities Include the “As-Built” Assessments to Determine the Actual Capability • Verification Activities are Focused to Ensure the System Works as Specified • Define TPMs • Develop Test Objectives • Develop Target Requirements • Command & Control Wargames • ACD/AVD • Corporate Lethality Program • Threat – Threat Risk Assessments • Lethality – Interface with IN and the Special Programs Center • CM/CCM • Black Team NTZ System Analysis NTY Risk Engineering NTJ Modeling & Simulation Engineering NTQ Program Cost and Investment Analysis NTP Program Management & Control • Conducts All of the Analysis to Support SE Efforts • Specific Sub-Groups will be Formed to Support Various SE Functions • A Single Analysis Team Ensures Consistency of Analysis • Executes the Entire Risk Process Across the MDNTS Enterprise • Includes Identification, Assessment, Handling and Monitoring • Supports the Range of Risk Management from Supporting Gap Analysis of Architecture to Detailed Assessments of the Block Being Implemented • Development & Maintenance of the Core Models • Development & Maintenance of the “Virtual Model” • Includes Associated Facilities Such as ARC/SIM Center and Interface to JNIC System Level Simulations (e.g. HWIL) • Perform Costing of the MDA BMDS • Perform Investment Analysis in the System Evolution Process • Management Operations • Program Support to SE • Graphics • Business Management • Information Tech • Security • Facilities • Program Coordination

22. BMDS CORNERSTONES • BMDS Cornerstones Satisfy Presidential Directive • All Phases, All Ranges, All Regions • Cornerstones Define Technical Objectives and Goals Effectiveness Metrics • Element Effectiveness Metrics Traceable to BMDS Cornerstones • Cornerstones will Evolve • Consequence of Capability-Based Acquisition Raid Size Capacity System Effectiveness Area Defended & Area Denied Battle Space Flexible Availability Reaction Time CM & Environmental Resistance Cornerstones Describe Technical Objectives and Goals

23. DESIGN & SPECIFICATION ENGINEERING Input Design & Specification Design Products Proposed Concept Engineering SCS Capabilities Engineering Performance Trade Studies Block Design Data Package ICS System Synthesis System Sub-System Performance ACN’s • Toolbox • Architecture • Analysis Interface Engineering Standards Standards &SpecialtyEngineering Corporate Databases System Architect Engineering Notebook DOORS

24. BMDS TEST AND ASSESSMENT Block Tool Kit (What) + Architecture (Where, How Many) Vignettes (Threat Context) Decision Makers Engagement Sequences BMDS On-Alert Capability Assessment + MDA DOT&E / OTAs STRATCOM Test Objectives Test Scenarios On-Alert Assessment Verification and Assessment OperationalAssessment Military UtilityAssessment Test Plan Provision, Execute, Analyze, Report Characterization Block Capability Integrated with On-Alert System Assessment Assessment (Capabilities and Limitations) Verification (Specification)

25. MDA DIRECTORATE COLLABORATION • Support to Kinetic Interceptor Directorate / Boost Phase Procurement Future Overlay Comparison Advanced Technologies Advanced EO/IR Sensors Advanced Algorithm Integration • Formation of BMDS Netted Sensors Directorate (MDA / SN) Spiral Upgrades Sensors Architecture Study Present

26. SYSTEM ENGINEERING CYCLE TIME REDUCTION Block 04 Definition & Design Cycle Options Examined 0 Months to Complete 23 SCS CCB’d Block 06 Definition & Design Cycle Options Examined 0 Months to Complete 16 SCS CCB’d Block 08 Projected Definition & Design Cycle Increasing System Performance Through Assessment of Multiple System, Component and Interface Options Options Examined 0 Months to Complete 11 SCS CCB’d

27. PRIORITIZED BLOCK CAPABILITY PROGRESSION System Level Weapon Tasking • KEI Integration / F.C. • ABIR / STSS Integration • KED / VS & ADI Integration • Dissimilar Source Fusion Adv System Level Discrimination Engage on Remote • Sensor Netting • Engage on Remote (Network) Candidate Block 2008 / 2010 System Level Reengagement • Hit / Kill Assessment • Advanced Consequence Management Discrimination Feature Utilization • Utilization of Sensor Fusion Data • Improved Interceptor Effectiveness System Capability Initial System Level Discrimination • Advanced Discrimination (SBX, THAAD, FBX) • Launch on Remote (Network) • Sensor Tasking • THAAD ICBM / IRB Reporting Continue BMDS Integration Block 2006 • Funded MDP-2 Sensors / Weapons • Initial BMDS Integration MDP-2 Block 2006 • Budgeted Element Capability Capability Groupings

28. Summer Review SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT CYCLE SYNCHRONIZED TO BUDGET MDNTS Schedule (Tier 1) 2004 2005 Task JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC POM 06 Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Input APOM 06 Kickoff Cycle 1 Input Cycle 2 Input PB06 Budget Milestones PB05 Kickoff Input Summer Review Program / System Milestones ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB ERB Evol Plng Evol Plng Evol Plng Evol Plng Evol Plng Evol Plng Evol Plng Evol Plng Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day MDA Capability IDC IDR Lite IDC 04/06 Declaration IDC SPR #2 SPR Integration IDC IDR 2 06 Capability Rvw #1 Rvw 08 Capability IDC SPR Gap/Cost #4 Rvw Benefit Anlsys Capability Alert 08 Director's IDC SPR Prog 2d #3 Guidance Declaration 08 PoD Rvw Peer Review Block Design 1st Description Peer Rvw Summer MDP3 MDP4 Study Summer Study Version: Baseline 1.1 Program Milestone Slide Program Milestone Slide Date: 2/2/04

29. BMDS PERFORMANCE CORNERSTONES • Reaction Time • Launch Area Denied / Area Defended • Flexible Availability • Countermeasures and Environmental Resistance • Raid Size Capacity • BMDS Effectiveness