1 / 8

Topic 2 Objectives

Topic 2 Objectives. Develop concept of efficiency to evaluate economic performance. distinction between positive and normative economics Link between resource allocation and economic transactions

delora
Download Presentation

Topic 2 Objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Topic 2 Objectives Develop concept of efficiency to evaluate economic performance. distinction between positive and normative economics Link between resource allocation and economic transactions Marginal conditions for efficiency – maximization of net social benefit at the pt where MSB = MSC

  2. Topic 2 Objectives • Resource allocation in competitive markets (no externalities) • monopoly power and govt invention leads to losses in efficiency • Welfare triangles to measure losses in well being when efficiency is not achieved • Equity-efficiency trade off • Utility possibility curve- explains why citizens rationally oppose movements to efficient resource use when compensation for losses in well-being is not actually paid • Positive analysis of equity-efficiency tradeoff

  3. TOPIC 2 OUTLINE • Positive and Normative Economics • Normative evaluation of resource use: the efficiency criterion • Marginal conditions for Efficiency • Markets, Prices and Efficiency Conditions • When does market interaction fail to achieve efficiency? • Monopolistic Power • How Taxes can cause losses in efficiency in Competitive Markets

  4. TOPIC 2 OUTLINE • How govt subsidies can cause losses in efficiency • Mkt failure : a preview of basis for govt activities • Equity vs efficiency • The trade off between efficiency and equity: graphic analysis • The trade off between efficiency and equity in a system competitive markets • Positive analysis tradeoff between equity and efficiency

  5. Major points on topic 2 • Difference between positive and normative approaches • Positive – a scientific method used to formulate hypotheses subject to empirical verification • Normative – based on underlying values that embody an individualistic ethic. • 2 aspects of efficiency: • Avoidance of waste in achieving any useful objective • Exchange- even if prod is accomplished without waste, additional net gains are usually possible through mutually agreeable exchanges

  6. Major points on topic 2 • Marginal conditions for efficiency: • Nt social gains are maximised when each possible g & s is made availale up to the pt where MSB= MSC • Additional prod is inefficient beyond the point eventhough TSB>TSC (fig 2.1) • Marginal Net benefit= MSB-MSC • Marginal conditions under perfectly competitive markets: • P =MPB=MPC in competitive mkt • Provided there is no 3rd party, P=MSB=MSC

  7. Major points on topic 2 • Example of cases where mkt do not achieve efficiency • Exercise of monopoly power – lack of competition causes losses in efficiency • Effect of taxes and subsidies on private choices in mkts • Losses in well-being from inefficient output levels is measured as triangular areas in the graphs. • Equity efficiency approach show how positive approach can be used to predict net gains and losses to citizens

  8. Major points on topic 2 • Utility possibility curve – a good tool to illustrate political conflict: • Max level of well –being of any one person, given the well-being of others depends on the resources available and technology. • There is no unique efficient alloc of resources • Efficient outcomes of comptv interaction can result in a distribution of well-being for which many persons live in poverty • UPC show how changes in resource alloc can result in both gainers and losers even when there is movement from inefficient to efficient resource use • Unless compensation is actually paid, the losers act to prevent the resource change that makes them worse off.

More Related