1 / 94

Humor and Psychology

Humor and Psychology. by Don L. F. Nilsen and Alleen Pace Nilsen. Modern Man. Modern man in contrast to primitive man has been called: Homo Erectus (upright man) Homo Sapiens (thinking man) Homo Ridens (laughing man). The Id, the Super Ego, and Tendentious Jokes.

dennan
Download Presentation

Humor and Psychology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Humor and Psychology by Don L. F. Nilsen and Alleen Pace Nilsen 33

  2. Modern Man • Modern man in contrast to primitive man has been called: • Homo Erectus (upright man) • Homo Sapiens (thinking man) • Homo Ridens (laughing man) 33

  3. The Id, the Super Ego, and Tendentious Jokes • “The Id is a pool for desires and drives. • As society and parental influence (represented in the super ego) do not allow the direct expression of sexual and hostile impulses, gratification can only be achieved in an indirect way. • There, individuals repressing their sexuality or aggression should show a preference for sexual and aggressive jokes.” (Ruch [2008] 29) 33

  4. Traits, States, and BehaviorsSeriousness vs. Playfulness • TRAITS: A “serious person” wants to function exclusively in the bona fide mode of communication. This is not true for a “playful person.” • STATES: We can be in a serious or pensive mood, or a silly mood. • BEHAVIORS: We can tell a joke or clown around. (Ruch [2008] 32) 33

  5. States • Playful Mood • Cheerful mood • Hilarious mood • Serious Mood • Earnestness • Pensiveness • Soberness • Bad Mood • Sadness • Melancholy • Ill-Humor (Adapted from Ruch [2008] 34) 33

  6. Moods (States) • “While an ill-humored person, like the serious one, may not want to be involved in humor, the person in a sad mood may not be able to do so even if he or she would like to.” • “Also, while the sad person is not antagonistic to a cheerful group, the ill-humored one may be.” • “Bad mood might also be a disposition facilitating certain forms of humor, such as mockery, irony, cynicism, and sarcasm.” (Ruch [2008] 34) 33

  7. Types of Humor • “Affiliative Humor” involves the tendency to say funny things, to tell jokes, and to engage in spontaneous witty banter. • “Self-Enhancing Humor” is a coping mechanism. • “Aggressive Humor” involves sarcasm, teasing, ridicule, derision, put downs or disparagement. • “Self-Defeating Humor” is when a person allows himself to be the butt of other people’s jokes. • (Ruch [2008] 38-39) 33

  8. Smiles • Willibald Ruch indicates that anatomically there are about 20 types of smiles, controlled by five facial muscles: • Zygomatic Major • Zygomatic Minor • Levator Anguli Oris • Buccinator • Risorius (Ruch [2008] 21) 33

  9. Enjoyment Smiles • “When individuals genuinely enjoy humor they show the facial configuration named the Duchenne display, which refers to the joint contraction of the zygomatic major and the orbicularis oculi muscles (pulling the lip corners backwards and upwards and raising the cheeks) causing eye wrinkles, respectively.” • (Ruch [2008] 21) 33

  10. Non-Enjoyment Smiles • “Smiles not following these definitions are unlikely to reflect genuine enjoyment of humor.” • “There may be smiling involved in blends of emotions (e.g., when enjoying a disgusting or frightening film), smiles masking negative emotions (e.g., pretending enjoyment when actually sadness or anger is felt), miserable, flirting, sadistic, embarrassment, compliance, coordination, contempt, and phony etc. smiles.” • (Ruch [2008] 22) 33

  11. Humor StylesCraik, Lampert, Nelson, & Ware 33

  12. Laughter • “Most laughter is not a response to jokes or other formal attempts at humor” (Provine [2001] 42). • Laughter may be caused by all sorts of non-humorous stimuli (tickling, laughing gas, embarrassment) and can be triggered by imitation (watching other people laugh) (Attardo [2007] 117) 33

  13. Giles and Oxford (1970) list seven causes of laughter: humorous, social, ignorance, anxiety, derision, apologetic, and tickling. • Olbrechts-Tyteca (1974) point out that “laughter largely exceeds humor.” • Jodi Eisterhold (2006) discussed the “principle of least disruption,” which “enjoins speakers to return to a serious mode as soon as possible.” 33

  14. LAUGHTER VS. SMILING • Because smiles can sometimes evolve into laughs and laughs can taper off into smiles, some people think that laughter is merely a form of exaggerated smiling. • However, smiles are more likely to express feelings of satisfaction or good will, while laughter comes from surprise or a recognition of an incongruity. • Furthermore, laughter is basically a public event while smiling is basically a private event. • (Nilsen & Nilsen 184) 33

  15. Laughter is an Invitation • “To laugh, or to occasion laughter through humor and wit, is to invite those present to come closer.” • “Laughter and humor are indeed like an invitation, be it an invitation for dinner, or an invitation to start a conversation: it aims at decreasing social distance.” • (Coser 172) • (Kuipers (2008): 366) 33

  16. Laughter is a social phenomenon. That’s why “getting the giggles” never happens when we are alone. • In contrast, people often smile when they are reading or even when they are having private thoughts. • (Nilsen & Nilsen 185) 33

  17. Smiling is not contagious, but laughter is contagious. • That’s why radio and television comedy performances often have a laugh track. (Nilsen & Nilsen 185) 33

  18. PHILOSOPHERS’ STATEMENTS ABOUT LAUGHTER • Throughout time, philosophers have made many statements about laughter that are not true of smiling. • These philosophers include Thomas Hobbes, Immanuel Kant, William Hazlitt, Arthur Schopenhauer, Henri Bergson and Sigmund Freud. • Each of these philosophers defined laughter in a different way: 33

  19. THOMAS HOBBES • Laughter is “the sudden glory arising from the sudden conception of some eminency in ourselves, by comparison with the infirmity of others.” • (Leviathan, 1651) 33

  20. IMMANUEL KANT • “Laughter is an affection arising from a strained expectation being suddenly reduced to nothing.” • (The Critique of Judgment, 1790) 33

  21. WILLIAM HAZLITT • “The essence of the laughable is the incongruous, the disconnecting one idea from another, or the jostling of one feeling against another.” • (Lecturers on the Comic Writers, Etc. of Great Britain, 1819) 33

  22. ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER • “The phenomenon of laughter always signifies the sudden apprehension of an incongruity between a conception and the real object.” • (The World as Will and Idea 1844) 33

  23. HENRI BERGSON • “Something mechanical encrusted on the living causes laughter.” • (Laughter 1900) 33

  24. SIGMUND FREUD • Laughter arises from “the release of previously existing static energy.” • (Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious, 1905) • (Nilsen & Nilsen 185) 33

  25. THE PARADOXES OF LAUGHTER • Although laughter is usually associated with mirth and joy, perpetrators of violent acts have also been known to exhibit menacing smiles, or to laugh demonically. • The paradoxes of laughter have been addressed by many laughter scholars: 33

  26. JAMES AGEE • James Agee classified the laughter of screen comedians into four categories: the titter, the yowl, the belly laugh, and the buffo. • “which he organized into six categories ranging from the incipient or ‘inner and inaudible’ laugh (the simper and smirk) to the loud and unrestrained howl, yowl, shriek, and Olympian laugh.” • (Nilsens in Raskin [2008] 260) 33

  27. GARY ALAN FINE • Gary Alan Fine has explained that a smile in one society may portray friendliness, in another embarrassment, while in still another it may be a warning of hostilities and attack if tension is not reduced. • (Nilsen & Nilsen 185) 33

  28. JACOB LEVINE • “No pattern of human behavior is so full of paradoxes.” • “We may laugh in sympathy, from anxiety or relief, from anger or affection, and from joy or frustration.” • “Conditions that can evoke laughter include shyness, triumph, surprise, tickling, a funny story, an incongruous situation, a sense of well-being associated with good health, and a desire to conceal one’s inner thoughts.” • (Nilsen & Nilsen 185) 33

  29. D. G. KEHL CITING JAMES THURBER • There are a dozen different kinds of laughter, from the inner and inaudible to the guffaw, taking in such variants as the laughter of shock, embarrassment, the “she-laughed-so-I-Iaughed-too,” and even the “he-laughed-so-I-didn’t” laugh. • (Nilsen & Nilsen 185) 33

  30. Del Kehl went on to divide laughter into ascending degrees of intensity: • There is the simper or smirk, the snicker or snigger, the titter, the giggle, the chuckle, the simple laugh, the cackle, the cachinnation, the chortle, the belly laugh, the horse laugh, the Olympian or Homeric laugh, the guffaw, the boff or boffo, the crack up, the roar, the yowl or howl, the bellow, the hoot, and the shriek. • (Nilsen & Nilsen 185-186) 33

  31. TICKLING • People who laugh from being tickled are not necessarily put in a more receptive mood for enjoying the humor in jokes. • This is because laughing from being tickled occurs in a part of the brain different from where laughter that is intellectually stimulated occurs. 33

  32. Furthermore, people cannot tickle themselves because the cerebelum in the lower back of the brain somehow sends an interfering message to the part of the brain that controls laughter. • (Nilsen & Nilsen 186) 33

  33. !FINAL CONTRAST OF HUMOR AND SMILING • Anthony Chapman did a study in which he compared the actions of a group of children who knew they were being observed with a group who did not know they were being observed. • The children who knew they were being watched laughed four times as often as did those in the other group. • However, they smiled only half as much. • (Nilsen & Nilsen 186) 33

  34. !!PARADOXICAL CONCLUSION • Anthony Chapman concluded not only that laughter can be good or bad, depending on the situation. • But he also concluded that humor is both the cause for laughter, and the result of laughter. • That’s why humor and laughter are so closely associated. • (Nilsen & Nilsen 186) 33

  35. !!!LAUGHTER WEB SITES COLOR-CHANGING CARD TRICK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asxUtX8Hyd4&feature=related The Happiness Machine: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=lqT_dPApj9U Laughaway (Arya Pathria): www.laughaway.com Laughter Remedy (Paul McGhee): http://www.LaughterRemedy.com 33

  36. Laughter Works (Kay Caskey & Laurie Young) www.LaughWays.com Lie to Me: http://www.fox.com/lietome/ Selective Attention Test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo World Laughter Tour (Steve Wilson): http://www.worldlaughtertour.com/ 33

  37. Related PowerPoint • The Brain 33

  38. References: Anderson, Craig A., and Lynn H. Arnoult. “An examination of Perceived Control, Humor, Irrational Beliefs, and Positive Stress as Moderators of the Relation between Negative Stress and Health.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 10.2 (1989): 101-117. Apter, Michael J. “Humour and Reversal Theory.” Chapter 8 in Michael Apter’s The Experience of Motivation: The Theory of Psychological Reversals. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1982. Apter, Michael J., and Kenneth C. P. Smith. “Humour and the Theory of Psychological Reversals.” in Chapman and Foot (1977): 95-100. Attardo, Salvatore. Linguistic Theories of Humor. New York, NY: Mouton, 1994. Bachorowski, J-Anne, Moria J. Smoski, and Michael J. Owren. “The Acoustic Features of Human Laughter.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110.3 (2001): 1581-1597. 33

  39. Bainy, Moses. Why Do We Laugh and Cry? West Ryde, Australia: Sunlight Publications, 1993. Barelds, Dick P. H., and Pieternel Barelds-Dijkstra. “Humor in Intimate Relationships: Ties among Sense of Humor, Similarity in Humor and Relationship Quality.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 23.4 (2010): 447-466. Bartolo, Angela, Francesca Benuzzi, Luca Nocetti, Patrizia Berarldi, and Paolo Nichelli. “Humor Comprehension and Appreciation: An fMRI Study.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006): 1789-1798. Beerman, Ursula, F. Gander, D. Hilterbrand, T. Wyss, and Willibald Rulch. “Laughing at Oneself: Trait or State? In Proceedings of the FACS-Workshop 2007. Eds. E. Bänninger-Huber and D. Peham. Innsbruck, Austria: Innsbruck University Press, 2009, 31-35. Beerman, Ursula, and Willibald Ruch. “How Virtuous is Humor? Evidence from Everyday Behavior.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 22.4 (2009): 395-418. 33

  40. Bergen, Doris. “Development of the Sense of Humor.” in Ruch (2007) 329-360. Berger, Peter. Redeeming Laughter: The Comic Dimension of Human Experience. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter, 1997. Bergher, Peter. Redeeming Laughter: An Essay on the Experience of the Comic. New York, Aldine de Gruyter, 1997. Berger, Arthur Asa. Redeeming Laughter. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter, 1997. Bergler, Edmund. Laughter and the Sense of Humor. New York, NY: Intercontinental Medical Book Corporation, 1967. 33

  41. Bergson, Henri Louis. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. New York, NY: MacMillan, 1924. Berkowitz, L. “Aggressive Humor as a Stimulus to Aggressive Responses.” Journal of Personal and Social Psychology. 16 (1970): 710-717. Billig, Michael. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humor. London, England: Sage Publications, 2005. Bizi, Smadar, Giora Keinan, and Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi. “Humor and Coping with Stress: A Test under Real-Life Conditions.” Personality and Individual Differences 9.6 (1988): 951-956. Booth-Butterfield, Steven, and Melanie Booth-Butterfield. “Individual Differences in the Communication of Humorous Messages.” Southern Communication Journal 56 (1991): 205-218. Caldwell, T. L., Cervone, D., and Rubin, L. H. “Explaining Intra-Individual Variability in Social Behavior through Idiographic Assessment: The Case of Humor.” Journal of Research in Personality 42 (2008): 1229-1242. 33

  42. Bressler, Eric R., Rod A. Martin, and Sigal Balshine. “Production and Appreciation of Humor as Sexually Selected Traits.” Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2006): 121-130. Brutsche, Martin H., Paul Grossman, Rebekka E. Miller, Jan Wiegand, Florent Baty and Willibald Ruch. “Impact of Laughter on Air Trapping in Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.” International Journal of COPD 3.1 (2008): 185-192. Bstan-’dzin-rgya-mtsho, Dalai Lama XIV, and Howard C. Cutler. The Art of Happiness: A Handbook for Living New York, NY: Riverhead Books, 1998. Buchowski, M. S., K. M. Majchrzak, K. Blomquist, K. Y. Chen, D. W. Byrne, and J.-A. Bachorowski. “Energy Expenditure of Genuine Laughter.” International Journal of Obesity 31.1 (2007): 131-137. Buckman, Elcha Shain. The Handbook of Humor: Clilnical Applications in Psychotherapy. Malabar, FL: Krieger, 1994. Cann, Arnie, Heather B. Davis, and Christine L. Zapata. “Humor Styles and Relationship Satisfaction in Dating Couples: Perceived Versus Self-Reported Humor Styles as Predictors of Satisfaction.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 24.1 (2011): 1-20. 33

  43. Capps, Donald. “Humor and Religion: Estranged Bedfellows.” Pastoral Psychology 54.5 (2006): 393-411. Capps, Donald. “The Psychological Benefits of Humor.” Pastoral Psychology 54.5 (2006): 393-411. Carlson, Keith A. “The Impact of Humor on Memory: Is the Humor Effect about Humor?” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 24.1 (2011): 21-42. Caron, James E. "From Ethology to Aesthetics: Evolution as a Theoretical Paradigm for Research on Laughter, Humor, and Other Comic Phenomena." HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 15.3 (2002): 245-281. Carretero-Dios, Hugo, Cristino Pérez, and Gualberto Buela-Casal. “Assessing the Appreciation of the Content and Structure of Humor.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 23.3 (2010): 307-326. 33

  44. Carretero-Dios, Hugo, René T. Proyer, Willibald Ruch, and V. J. Rubio. “The Spanish Version of the GELOPH<15>: Properties of a Questionnaire for the Assessment of the Fear of Being Laughed at.” International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 10 (2010): 345-357. Carretero-Dios, Hugo, Vélez Agudelo, Willibald Ruch, Tracey Platt, and René T. Proyer. “Fear of Being Laughed at and Social Anxiety: A Preliminary Psychometric Study.” Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 52 (2010): 108-124. Carretero-Dios, Hugo, and Willibald Ruch. “Humor Appreciation and Sensation Seeking: Invariance of Findings across Culture and Assessment Instrument?” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 23.4 (2010): 427-446. Chafe, Wallace. The Importance of Not Being Earnest: The Feeling Behond Laughter and Humor. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2007. 33

  45. Chapman, Anthony, and Hugh Foot, eds. It’s a Funny Thing, Humour. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press, 1977. Cherkas, Lynn, Fran Hochberg, Alex J. McGregor, Harold Sneider, and Tim D. Spector. “A Twin Study of Humour.” Twin Research 3 (2000): 17-22. Chafe, Wallace. “Laughing while Talking.” in Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics Ed. James E. Alatis, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2001: 36-49. Chapman, Antony J., and Hugh C. Foot, eds. Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research, and Applications. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1996. Chapman, Antony J., and Hugh C. Foot, eds. It’s a Funny Thing, Humour. Oxford, England: Pergamon, 1977. 33

  46. Chen, Guo-Hai, Chao-Chih (Laura) Liao, René T. Proyer, and Willibald Ruch. “A Summary on Research in Gelotophobia.” China Journal of Health Psychology 17 (2009): 893-895. Chen, Guo-Hai, and Rod A. Martin. “A Comparison of Humor Styles, Coping Humor, and Mental Health between Chinese and Canadian University Students.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research. 20.3 (2007): 215-234. Churchill, James S., and Marjorie Grene. Laughing and Crying: A Study of the Limits of Human Behavior. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ Press, 1970. Cogan, Rosemary, Dennis Cogan, William Waltz, and Melissa McCue. “Effects of Laughter and Relaxation on Discomfort Thresholds.” Journal of Behavioral Medicine 10 (1987): 139-144. Coser, Rose. “Some Social Functions of Laughter: A Study of Humor in a Hospital Setting.” Human Relations 12.2 (1959): 171-182. 33

  47. Coulson, Seana, and M. Kutas. “Getting It: Human Event-Related Brain Response to Jokes in Good and Poor Comprehenders.” Neuroscience Letters 316 (2001): 71-74. Coulson, Seana, and Ying Choon Wu. “Right Hemisphere Activation of Joke-Related Information: An Event-Related Brain Potential Study.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 173 (2005): 494-506. Coulson, Seana, and Robert F. Williams. “Hemispheric Asymmetries and Joke Comprehension.” Neuropsychologica 43 (2005): 128-141. Cousins, Norman. “Proving the Power of Laughter.” Psychology Today 23 (1989): 22-25. Craik, Kenneth H., and Aaron P. Ware. “Humor and Personality in Everyday Life” in Ruch [2007] 63-94. Craik, Kenneth H., Martin D. Lempert, and Arvelea J. Nelson. Research Manual for the Humorous Behavior Q-sort Deck. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1993. 33

  48. Craik, Kenneth H., Martin D. Lempert, and Arvelea J. Nelson. “Sense of Humor and Styles of Everyday Humorous Conduct.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 9/3-4 (1996): 273-302. Cropley, A., and Graeme Galloway. “Humour and Mental Health: Implications for Psychotherapy.” Journal of Baltic Psychology 2 (2001): 5-14. Cunningham, William A., and Peter Derks. “Humor Appreciation and Latency of Comprehension.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research. 18 (2005): 389-403. Cutica, Ilaria. “The Neuropsychology of Irony and Verbal Humor: Patterns of Impairment in Different Types of Cerebral Damage.” in Popa and Attardo (2007): 111-139. Danzer, Amy, Alexander Dale, and Herbert L. Klions. “Effects of Exposure to Humorous Stimuli on Induced Depression.” Psychological Reports 66 (1990): 1027-1036. Davies, Christie. “The Dog that Didn’t Bark in the Night: A New Sociological Approach to the Cross-Cultural Study of Humor” in Ruch (2007) 293-308. 33

  49. Davies, Christie. “Humor Theory and the Fear of Being Laughed At.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 22.1-2 (2009): 49-62. De Koning, Erica, and R. L. Weiss. “The Relational Humor Inventory: Functions of Humor in Close Relationships.” American Journal of Family Therapy 30 (2002): 1-18. Deckers, Lambert. “Influence of Mood on Humor” in Ruch (2007) 309-328. Derks, Peter, Lynn S. Gillikin, Debbie S. Bartolome-Rull, and Edward H. Bogart. "Laughter and Electroencephalographic Activity." HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 10.3 (1997): 285-300. Derks, Peter, Rosemary E. Staley, and Martie G. Haselton. “‘Sense’ of Humor: Perception, Intelligence, or Expertise?” in Ruch (2007) 143-158. Dixon, Norman F. “Humor: A Cognitive Alternative to Stress? In Stress and Anxiety, Volume 7, ed. Irwin G. Sarason and Charles D. Spielberger, Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1980, 281-289. 33

  50. Doosje, Sibe, Martin de Goede, Lorenz Van Doornen, and Jeffrey Goldstein. “Measurement of Occupational Humorous Coping.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 23.3 (2010): 275-306. Douglas, Mary. “The Social Control of Cognition: Some Factors in Joke Perception.” Man, New Series 3 (1968): 361-376. Drack, P., T. Huber, and Willibald Ruch. “The Apex of Happy Laughter: A FACS Study with Actors.” in Proceedings of the FACS-Workshop 2007. Eds. E. Bänninger-Huber and D. Peham. Innsbruck, Austria: Innsbruck University Press, 2009, 36-41. Dudden, Arthur P. The Assault of Laughter. New York, NY: A. S. Barnes, 1962. Eastman, Max. Enjoyment of Laughter. NY: Simon and Schuster, 1936. Eckardt, A. Roy. Sitting in the Earth and Laughing: A Handbook of Humor. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1992. Eisterhold, Jodi, Salvatore Attardo, and Diana Boxer. “Reactions to Irony in Discourse: Evidence for the Least Disruption Principle.” Journal of Pragmatics 38.8 (2006): 1239-1256. 33

More Related