1 / 14

Imaging a Fault with Magnetotellurics

Imaging a Fault with Magnetotellurics. By Peter Winther. Outline. Science of Magnetotellurics Instrumentation MT data TEM Static Shift Conclusion. Magnetotellurics. Record natural occurring EM fields Sources are lightning and solar wind Currents are then induced within the Earth

dennan
Download Presentation

Imaging a Fault with Magnetotellurics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Imaging a Fault with Magnetotellurics By Peter Winther

  2. Outline • Science of Magnetotellurics • Instrumentation • MT data • TEM Static Shift • Conclusion

  3. Magnetotellurics • Record natural occurring EM fields • Sources are lightning and solar wind • Currents are then induced within the Earth • Apparent resistivity is calculated • Depth of exploration is related to the skin depth

  4. Helmholtz Equation Quasistic Approx. Characteristic Impedance Apparent Resistivity Skin Depth 2E + (2- i)E = 0 d2Ex/dz2 + k2Ex = 0  Z = Ex/Hy = 0/k a = (1/0)Ex/Hy2  = (2/)1/2  0.5(T)1/2 (km) MT Theory

  5. Imaging with MT • MT theory assumes incident plane waves • Need an apparent resistivity contrast • Structures located within layers of the same resistivity can not be imaged!

  6. Stratagem • Up to ~500 m depth (based on skin depth) • Frequency range: 10 Hz – 100 kHz

  7. MT Line 100m

  8. MT raw data 100 TEM Log a () MT 10 Log T (s) 90 Phase -90 0.0001 0.001 0.01

  9. TEM Static Shift TEM 100 MT Log a () 10 Log T (s) 90 Phase -90 0.0001 0.001 0.01

  10. 1D Modeling 10 Depth (m) 100 1000 Log a () 10 100

  11. Elevation (m) Resistive MT Cross section 1700 Conductive Resistive 1600 Conductive 1500 100 m

  12. Elevation (m) Resistive TEM Cross section 1700 Conductive Resistive 1600 1500 Conductive 100 m

  13. Elevation (m) 2D Inversion Model Resistive 1700 Conductive 1600 1500 100m

  14. Conclusion • Large conductive layer in canyon related to saturated clays in the Santa Fe Group. • Resistive layer further out due to dry basin fill with a more conductive layer underneath. • Fault is imaged between Station 500 and Station 600.

More Related