170 likes | 329 Views
Symbolic Immortality at Work: Understanding the Antecedents of Generative Job Performance. B. Lindsay Brown & Lillian Eby. Research Question: How does mortality awareness translate into meaningfulness in the workplace?. Age development & nurturing younger generations (Erikson, 1950 )
E N D
Symbolic Immortality at Work: Understanding the Antecedents of Generative Job Performance B. Lindsay Brown & Lillian Eby
Research Question: How does mortality awareness translate into meaningfulness in the workplace?
Age development & nurturing younger generations (Erikson, 1950) • Motivation, behaviors, & attitudes directed towards helping or positively impacting others, organizations, community, or society (McAdams, St. Aubin, & Kim, 1992) • Associated w/ meaningfulness in life What is generativity?
Existential dilemma • Transcend death by impacting the world and making contribution to the future that will benefit others (Kotre, 1984; Wade-Benzoni, 2006; Wade-Benzoni, et al., 2009) • Generativity connects the individual with something greater than the self and is associated with mortality awareness (Becker, 1973; Kotre, 1984) • Generativity allows one to “outlive the self” (Kotre, 1984) Symbolic Immortality & Meaningfulness
Contradictory findings • Beneficial & detrimental • Job tension (Chisolm, Kasl, & Eskenazi,1983) • Pro-social behaviors (Elder & Clipp, 1988) • Task significance & variety • Emotional exhaustion, organizational commitment & pay satisfaction (Jermier, Gaines, & McIntosh, 1989) Current Literature on Workplace Mortality Awareness
Multiple work contexts • Overt - Combat military, hospice workers • Covert - Substance abuse counselors, ER clerical staff, 911 operators • Personal & vicarious effects of death at work • Aging population • Trainability Importance of Understanding Mortality Awareness at Work
Formally assess mortality awareness and relationships to supervisor-rated performance outcomes • Address when and for whom mortality awareness increases workplace generativity • Grant & Wade-Benzoni’s (2009) contingency model of death awareness at work Current Study
Work orientation Job design Death reflection Generative work behaviors Contingency Model of Death Awareness at Work (Grant & Wade-Benzoni, 2009)
Calling work orientation Mentoring received H3 H2 Generative work behaviors: Task performance OCB-I Death reflection H1 Research Hypotheses
Sample • 348 substance abuse counselors and their clinical supervisors • 17 organizations across U.S. Procedure • Paper-and-pencil surveys part of larger N.I.D.A. study • $50/$75 compensation Measures • Previously validated (α= .88 - .97) • Supervisor-rated job performance Method
H1a & H2a not supported; H3a supported Results: Hierarchical Moderated Regression - Task Performance
Three-way Interaction of Death Reflection, Calling, & Mentoring on Task Performance
Three-way Interaction of Death Reflection, Calling, & Mentoring on Task Performance
H1b, H2b, & H3b not supported Results: Hierarchical Moderated Regression - OCB-I
All three factors must be present to positively impact generative task performance • Null findings • Practical implications • Self-selection • Job previews • Theoretical implications • Specifying behaviors and relationships • Future research • Mediating factors • Other forms of generative work outcomes Discussion
“What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.”-Albert Pike
Questions? Thank you for your time.