1 / 20

Michael T. Frank DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 (650) 833-2000 micha

Converting Stock Awards in a Merger or Acquisition July 12, 2006. Ellen N. Sueda Hewlett-Packard Company 3000 Hanover Street, MS 1050 Palo Alto, CA 43304 (650) 857-3984 ellen.sueda@hp.com. Michael T. Frank DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP 2000 University Avenue

denver
Download Presentation

Michael T. Frank DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 (650) 833-2000 micha

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Converting Stock Awards in a Merger or Acquisition July 12, 2006 Ellen N. Sueda Hewlett-Packard Company 3000 Hanover Street, MS 1050 Palo Alto, CA 43304 (650) 857-3984 ellen.sueda@hp.com Michael T. Frank DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 (650) 833-2000 michael.frank@dlapiper.com

  2. What Do the Plans Provide? Target’s Plan • Does the Plan permit conversion of awards? • Does the Plan permit early termination of awards that will not be continued? • Are there notice or consent provisions? Buyer’s Plan • Does the Plan provide for substitution of awards? 2

  3. Should Buyer Convert Awards? • Determine the retention impact • Part or full acceleration of vesting upon the change may impact retention planning • Buyer may not want to convert options if there is no retention value 3

  4. Should Buyer Convert Awards? • Consider tax impact • The loss of qualification of ISOs with acceleration of options due to the ISO $100K limit • Section 280G: non-deductibility of certain accelerated awards and compensation • Consider the number of former employees of Target who hold awards • Securities held by a former employee may require additional securities filings 4

  5. Should Buyer Convert Awards? • Non-U.S. jurisdictions • Determine labor/employment laws, regulatory requirements, e.g., governmental filings, and foreign exchange requirements • Determine if awardees subject to immediate taxation upon the change of control • Consider Buyer’s policies concerning awards in various jurisdictions 5

  6. Retention • Buyer may not want to convert awards that have no retention value, e.g., awards that have full acceleration of vesting upon a change of control • Do not forget to review individual employment agreements or arrangements in addition to the plan and individual award agreements • Consider the following: • Consent from key employees to amend awards to remove or modify acceleration of vesting • If a cash deal, arrange for a holdback of award proceeds for key employees (do not forget about 409A) 6

  7. Due Diligence A good due diligence list is important. It will remind you of the pitfalls and challenges of mergers and acquisitions! 7

  8. Assume or Substitute? • Assumption Pros: • Preserves your share reserve • Can grant assumed reserve shares, but not for employees of Buyer 8

  9. Assume or Substitute? • Assumption Cons: • Multiple share buckets in multiple deals • Awards treated as non-shareholder approved for “201(d)” table in proxy/10-K • Additional overhang • Form S-8 filing, including a prospectus • Administration of another plan’s terms and conditions in addition to already existing plans • Who will administer the plan and update prospectus? • Different plan terms and conditions complicate any future communications • Reserves and registration need to be tracked separately 9

  10. Assume or Substitute? • Substitution Pros: • One share reserve • May be able to harmonize rules (beware ISO modification and 409A) • Report awards as shareholder approved in the proxy • No separate Form S-8 filing • No need to administer another plan’s terms and conditions; however, if material terms are preserved and are different from regular option grant terms, then should be described in the prospectus and other communications (also, watch modification)

  11. Assume or Substitute? • Substitution Cons: • Impacts existing share reserve • Changing terms may require optionee consent and cause confusion to optionees

  12. Conversion Mechanics • Preserve Aggregate “Spread” • Typically, when applying the conversion ratio, round price up and round share number down • Preserve Ratio of Fair market Value to Strike Prices • Example Target holds an option to buy 100 shares @ $5 per share. Target shares worth $10 at closing. Buyer shares worth $20 at closing. Target option becomes buyer option to buy 50 buyer shares @$10 • Used to retain ISO status and avoid 409A problems 12

  13. Restricted Stock – Specific Issues • Does Plan require explicit assumption/assignment of forfeiture or repurchase right? • Cash deal = right to get cash? • Securities law issue of treating shareholders of the same class of stock differently

  14. Employee Stock Purchase Plans • Generally are terminated upon an acquisition • Target should expect that its ESPP will be terminated and ensure that the plan document provides for mid-period termination 14

  15. Additional Issues to Consider • ISO rules • 409A compliance • Earn outs • Cash transactions • Grant documentation (accounting or 409A issues?) 15

  16. ISO Issues • Is there a $100K limitation issue? • Will acceleration of options disqualify all or part of the option? • Will there be any modification causing a disqualification? • Conversion mechanics nearest whole cause a disqualification? E.g., rounding shares up or rounding strike price down • If substituting, does Buyer’s plan provide for applicable ISO rules? 16

  17. Section 409A Issues • Discounted stock options • Option pricing history and methodology • Reasonable valuation or safe harbor for stock valuation for private companies • Modification of plans or stock awards after 12/31/04 • Extension of exercise period? • Faulty conversion? • Repricing? • RSUs with retirement features and/or deferral of equity awards 17

  18. Earn Out Issues • Exchange of “share right” for earnout right? • Including earn out right in option 18

  19. Negotiation Items • Have Target revise non-compliant plans and arrangements, e.g., reprice or limit exercise on discounted options. • Special Indemnity Escrow? • Cover future compliance and other “HR” costs? • Consider in light of Section 409A and recent option backdating issues • Adjust purchase price by amount necessary to gross-up taxes, e.g., 409A or 280G, and cost of withholding/reporting, or include adjustments as part of the escrow arrangement. 19

  20. For Questions Please Contact: Michael T. Frank DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 (650) 833-2000 michael.frank@dlapiper.com

More Related