1 / 13

Other Party Management (OPMT) 9104/1 Special Sub Team Recommendation Summary

Other Party Management (OPMT) 9104/1 Special Sub Team Recommendation Summary . Tim Lee & Ian Folland June 23, 2010. Background. 9104/1 Ballot Failure The Dec 2009 ballot draft failed in Americas and Asia Pacific and stopped in Europe

denver
Download Presentation

Other Party Management (OPMT) 9104/1 Special Sub Team Recommendation Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Other Party Management (OPMT) 9104/1 Special Sub TeamRecommendation Summary Tim Lee & Ian Folland June 23, 2010

  2. Background 9104/1 Ballot Failure • The Dec 2009 ballot draft failed in Americas and Asia Pacific and stopped in Europe • 9104/1 Sub Team and OPMT conducted extensive debate on “Show Stopper” issues but failed to reach any consensus. • Site definition • Audit day calculation for multiple sites Go Forward – IAQG Council Direction • OPMT was directed to charter a focused team to conduct a non advocate review of the show stopper issues. Team shall be comprised of technical experts • Team launch - May 2010 • Recommend a solution (June 23, 2010)

  3. 9104/1 Special Team Ian Folland & Tim Lee – Facilitators Team Members: • Roger Bennett - International Independent Organization for Certification (IIOC) – IAF MD 1 Convener and IAF MD 5 Co-convener • Reg Blake - Certification Body (CB) representing the Independent Association of Accredited Registrars (IAAR) • Norbert Borzek - German AB - DAkkS – Chair of the IAF Technical Committee . • Patrick Boucheron – Turbomeca, France, OPMT Voting Member • Buddy Cressionnie - IAQG 9100 International Document Representative (IDR) • Randy Dougherty – USA AB - ANAB Director – Chair of the IAF • Michel Jacquaniello – Zodiac Aerospace, France • Kunihiro Tanabe - Japanese AB - JAB • Norikazu Tsuchiya – KHI, Japan, OPMT Voting Member

  4. Team Recommendations • The team developed a detailed document containing the following concepts: • Definitions and eligibility criteria for single site, multiple site, campus, several site and complex organizations; • Audit day calculations methodology for all organizational types; • Information in the form of a matrix and diagrams to help understand the different types or organizations

  5. Definitions • The team recommended that the ICOP process utilizes as much of IAF Mandatory Document language as possible • Definition: • Site - A site is a permanent location where an organization carries out work or a service • Rationale: • Allows for dual certification (ISO and AQMS) • IAF language has been tested and currently in use by CB’s • Used to resolve the show stopper issue related to Site definition

  6. Organizational Structure • Team has developed detailed definitions and eligibility criteria for the following organizational structures • Single Site • Multiple Site • Campus • Several Sites • Complex • The above takes into consideration the unique organizational structures that exist in the Aviation, Space and Defense industry today

  7. Example A - Campus Must have a common quality management system

  8. Example B - Several Sites Must have a common quality management system

  9. Audit Day Requirements • Utilize audit day table contained in 9104-1 December 2009 draft. • Audit Day Calculations • Single Site – Number of employees – Reductions for ASRP and CAAT only • Multiple Site – Number of employees at each site. Reductions for ASRP and CAAT only • Campus – Total number of employees across all sites. No further reductions. 10% addition for auditing aspects of a campus and additional communication by audit team • Several Sites - Number of employees at each site. Maximum of 30% reduction for reduced scope complexity at each site • Complex – Combination of all the above. Audit time calculation will require approval by OPMT Sub Team • Use of Advanced Surveillance Reassessment Procedures (ASRP) and Computer Aided Auditing Techniques (CAAT) should be allowed (maximum 30% reduction) • ASRP shall not in itself be used to justify a reduction

  10. Certification Matrix • Detailed matrix was developed to provide clarification

  11. Next Steps • Deliver special team recommendations to 9104/1 team (July 1, 2010) • Request incorporation of special teams recommendations into updated 9104/1 draft • 9104/1 Sub team to continue with development process • Disposition of all 9104/1 comments • Ballot updated document

  12. Summary • The Team has delivered a recommendation that was on time and on target • Recommendation addresses key 9104/1 ballot failure issues - “Show Stoppers” • IAF representatives agreed to take lesson learned from this effort to drive IAF Mandatory Document changes (e.g. IAF MD 5 – Audit Day Calculations) • This should be an acceptable go forward proposal that provides for sufficient on site audit time needed for an “Effective” ICOP assessment

  13. 9104-1 Special Team

More Related