220 likes | 840 Views
Quantum Mechanics in. 3-D. Modifying the Schr ö dinger Equation. The real universe has three space dimensions: x , y , and z What needs to change about this formula? Wave function needs to be more complicated The momentum p is now a vector. Time Independent 3D Schr ö dinger.
E N D
Quantum Mechanics in 3-D Modifying the Schrödinger Equation • The real universe has three space dimensions: x, y, and z • What needs to change about this formula? • Wave function needs to be more complicated • The momentum p is now a vector
Time Independent 3D Schrödinger If the potential is independent of time • We have reduced our wave function from four variables to three (good) • But it’s still a partial differential equation (bad) • Need to find tricks to make this problem solvable • The interpretation of the wave function is pretty much the same • The amplitude squared is the probability density • To find probability in a region, integrate • Have to normalize like before
Separation of Variables ??? none x only y only z only • We need to solve this equation – try separation of variables? • Substitute it in, divide by wave function • This method rarely works, because naturally occurring problems are rarely set up in Cartesian coordinates • Two problems we will solve: • Free particle • Particle in a 3D box
Free particle in 3D none x only y only z only • First term is pure function of x, but nothing else has x in it • Therefore, this term must be independent of x • Same argument applies to the other two terms • We can easily solve all these equations
Particle in a 3D box Lz • We get same differential equations as before: • This time it is more useful to get real solutions: • Must vanish at x = 0 and x = Lx • Same type of solutions for y and z • Need to normalize wave functions Ly Lx
Spherical Coordinates • Very few problems have “Cartesian symmetry” • Look at hydrogen-like atom • Many problems have spherical symmetry • Independent of angles z r sin • Switch from Cartesian to Spherical Coordinates • r is the distance from the origin to the point • is the angle compared to the z-axis • is the angle of the projected “shadow”compared to the x-axis r cos r y r sincos r sinsin x Note that = 0 = 2 In math notation, and are swapped
Derivatives in Spherical Coordinates • WARNING: This is nasty! • We need to write derivatives in terms of the new coordinates • Think of x, y, and z as functions of r, , and use the chain rule Work, work, . . . Let’s rewrite Schrödinger’s equation in spherical coordinates now
Schrödinger’s Eq. in Spherical Coords. Assume potential depends only on r, and call the mass • Change to spherical coordinates on the left • Multiply result by r2 • Now we can try separation of variables,this time in new coordinates • Substitute in • Divide by the wave function, and bring first term on left over to the right
Schrödinger’s Eq. in Spherical Coords. (2) Left side is independent of r Right side is independent of and Both sides must be constant – call them -L2 Multiply first equation by –Y Multiply second equation by R/2r2
The Problem Broken in Two • No dependence on V(r) • Can be solved for all spherically symmetric problems • No more partial derivatives! • Looks like 1D-Schrödinger • The L2 term looks like anaddition to the potential • The effective potential is just this term • Very similar to how classical mechanics solves this problem
Solving the angle equation • Strategy: • Guess some solutions • Rotate them and find some more
Solving the angle equation (2) • Will any l work? • We want Y to befinite • l 0 • We want it to be continuous • l is an integer • l= 0,1, 2, 3, … Note that = 0 = 2 • Rotate them and find some more • Example: 180º rotation around x - axis • Work, work, until you find as many as you can • Normalize them (more on this later)
Spherical Harmonics • The functions you get this way are called spherical harmonics • They arise in any problem with spherical symmetry • The angular solutions are always the same • Look them up, don’t calculate them • What do l and m really mean? • Consider angular momentum operator • z-angular momentum is m • Total angular momentum squared is 2(l2+l)
Sample Problems An electron in a spherically symmetric potential has a total angular momentum squared of 62. If we measure the angular momentum around the z –axis, what are the possible outcomes? An electron in a spherically symmetric potential has a total angular momentum quantum number l < 3. How many possible pairs (l,m) are there?