360 likes | 494 Views
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW P09321 – AUTOMATED MEDICINE DISPENSER DATE (01-16-2009) . Michael Boquard (CE) Felix Feliz (ME) Rebecca Jaiven (EE) (Lead Engineer) Matthew Jones (ME) Shuaib Mansoori (EE) Justin Zagorsk (IE) (Team Leader) . OVERVIEW. Intro Roles & Responsibilities
E N D
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEWP09321 – AUTOMATED MEDICINE DISPENSERDATE (01-16-2009) Michael Boquard (CE) Felix Feliz (ME) Rebecca Jaiven (EE) (Lead Engineer) Matthew Jones (ME) Shuaib Mansoori (EE) Justin Zagorsk (IE) (Team Leader)
OVERVIEW • Intro • Roles & Responsibilities • Customer Requirements • HOQ • Engineering Specifications • Summary of Concept Selection • Summary of Selected Concepts • Electrical System Summary • Software System Summary • Schedules • Risks & Issues
INTRO – PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Produce a robust prototype that dispenses medication on a time-bases to patients in a secure and accountable environment. • Allow to dispense a week’s supply of up to 6 different pills for two patients accessed twice daily. • Reliable and compact electro-mechanical dispensing system that can be controlled by a common laptop.
INTRO - SCOPE • Start with a working prototype. • ~5 years outdated • Modify to meet customer needs/specs. • Deliver functioning prototype by end of MSDII.
INTRO – Target End User • One who takes medication on a regular basis, is technological capable*, and desires to have their medication in a safe and secure environment. • * a technology capable person is familiar with basic computer functions and/or has the willingness to learn.
ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES • Justin Zagorski (IE) Team Leader • Rebecca Jaiven (EE) Lead Engineer • Michael Boquard (CE) • Felix Feliz (ME) • Matthew Jones (ME) • Shuiab Mansoori (EE) • D. Phillips (EE) • E. Hanzlik (ME) • John Veenstra GUI & Interfacing Design & Manufacturing Electrical Components & Circuitry Faculty Guide Faculty Advisor Sponsor
Critical Customer Needs and Engineering Specifications Customer Needs Laptop Interface 360° Security™ Ensure accountability for delivery and distribution of medication. Properly and Reliably Dispense Medication Dispenses medication for two people, twice a day for a week, for six different medications each distribution. Portable Engineering Specs Biometric Access CN of security/laptop Software properly access appropriate location and no mechanical failures CN properly and reliably dispenses medicine 4 levels of user access CN security Size/weight limits CN portability
Hardware Concept Selection Criteria Size Security – visibility of medication Scalability Simplicity Reliability Ease of Use – customer interface Return Area Packaging – external housing unit
Top 3 DesignsSee full PUGH in Appendix A Scale: 0 is neutral 1 is positive -1 is negative
Selected Design First Iteration Collapsible Legs Empty Return Hinges Collapsible Ramp
Second Iteration Unfolded Collapsed *Collapsed dimensions: 11”x11”x6” Front views Rear views
Levels of User Access • User 1 – Patient • User 2 – Pharmacist • User 3 – Delivery • User 4 – Administration The prescription is changed by the Doctor who informs that pharmacist who changes the pills placed into the cartridge.
Preliminary System Integration • Mechanical- Electrical • Electrical will mount on prototype on designated space • Electrical will power Nitinol drivers • Electrical-Software • Software controls TTL signal that sends signal high
Engineering Assumptions • Aluminum 1100 O • ν= .33 • E=10.1 Msi • T=.09 • P= 7.5 lb • Yield Strength= 20ksi Loading case 1: 2- 1” hinges applied 2in from each end Loading case 2: 1 3/8” wide welded rail holding a total of 1.94 lbs
Engineering Analysis • Leg analysis • Maximum stress: 455.9psi • Maximum deflection: .00185in in z-direction • Rail analysis • Maximum stress: 30.632psi • Maximum deflection: .322X10-5in
Engineering Analysis Conclusions • The stresses and deflections incurred for both the leg and rail are well below the maximum allowed tolerances for the individual parts. • This indicates that the thicknesses assigned and the materials selected fit well with our design. And confirms that the mechanical design is sound.
MSDII Timeline *need to create another critical path Appendix C is Microsoft Project
RISKS 5 – Life Threatening 4 - Nonfunctional Prototype 3 – Fixable Glitch 2- Outside of Design Control 1 – Not critical to functionality
ISSUES (Most important to least) Time Scope Creep Availability of machine shop/electrical components/Nitinol fibers & latches OS updates Team schedules conflicting Available computers/people for testing Ramp packaging space (hinge thickness) Cartridge loaded and delivered in different time zones
BACK UP SLIDES (Appendix, extra info, etc..)
Appendix • Appendix A – PUGH Chart Link • Appendix B – ANSYS • Appendix C - Microsoft Project Link