1 / 20

Modeling the West Nile Virus

Modeling the West Nile Virus. Michel Dedeo Hanni Muerdter Brad White May 12, 2004. Mosquito host. Bird Reservoir Host. There are many gaps in knowledge about WNV…. However, many trends have been observed. Such as: The year after first infection, the infection rates are much lower.

desiderio
Download Presentation

Modeling the West Nile Virus

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modeling the West Nile Virus Michel Dedeo Hanni Muerdter Brad White May 12, 2004

  2. Mosquito host Bird Reservoir Host

  3. There are many gaps in knowledge about WNV… However, many trends have been observed. Such as: The year after first infection, the infection rates are much lower.

  4. There are many gaps in knowledge about WNV… However, many trends have been observed. Such as: The year after first infection, the infection rates are much lower. • Hypothesis: • The acquired immunity of birds to WNV.

  5. thus, the amplification reservoir for the disease is reduced in the subsequent years • However, nestlings, which are born without immunity, are believed to account for the peak in infection rate in the late summer.

  6. Our Model: • Will attempt to look at the validity of these hypotheses • Will also test the importance and sensitivity of various coefficients effecting the cycle • Birth rate, infection rates, ….

  7. Purpose: • Lead to a more complete understanding of the ecology of WNV and similar arboviruses • Hopefully, the model will be able to help vector ecologists concentrate their field and experimental studies

  8. Methods/Approach: • modeled the enzootic cycle of WNV • life cycle interactions of the Blue Jay population and the Culex pipiens/restuans complex in Ohio • In order to stimulate the annual initation of WNV, we had virus-positive mosquitoes overwinter (delay function) • Left out multiple reservoir hosts and vectors • species chosen are representative of most hosts & vectors • allows the model to be more transparent

  9. Blue Jay Life Cycle Mosquito Life Cycle

  10. Our Model Data vs. Survey Data  SURVEY DATA MODEL DATA  Number of individuals Time (months)

  11. 1. IMMUNE BIRDS 1. INFECTED BIRDS 1. INFECTED MOSQUITOES Model Population Dynamics 1. HEALTHY BIRDS Number of individuals Time (months)

  12. Changes in variables:

  13. So, what does all this suggest? • Periodic outbreaks of arboviruses associated with endemic cycles are thought to result from some external pressure. • Due to rain? • Our model suggests… • WNV may have very low infection rates in both birds and mosquitoes for some time (silently cycle) • Followed by a major enzootic outbreak of the disease without any external forcing.

  14. initial outbreak causes a significant drop in the bird population • The low population + relatively high number of immune birds following an outbreak causes the disease to become less abundant in both birds and mosquitoes. • This allows the bird population to grow quickly. • The bird population was modeled so they recover from serious damages to the population number. • raising the birth rate from the observed number of 2.5 for every bird to 3 for every bird. • Conceptually, this can be justified because intraspecific competition for resources decreases.

  15. To further explore WNV: • long-term surveillance of mosquito infection rates and bird populations • Currently, many surveillance programs are abandoned • extending these surveillance programs indefinitely could lead to interesting new knowledge about the complex cycling of arboviral diseases.

  16. More on our model: • immunonaive juveniles may play an important role in the late summer increases of WNV infection in mosquitoes • Field surveys • Our model didn’t show that immunity played a significant role in the long-term decline of WNV prevalence following initial outbreak • the death rate of the immune birds negates any long-term impacts that they could have on the disease • Indeed, our model suggests that the total number of avian reservoir hosts may be more important than the immune/susceptible ration of birds. • Field studies have confirmed that WNV can have a detrimental impact on wild bird populations (Male 2003) • Short life span of blue jays

  17. Final Conclusion: • Model is a major simplification of the actual WNV natural cycle. • WNV cycling dependent on different characteristics of the bird population • (as shown by altering our coefficients) • As earlier suggested, knowing more about the species make-up of the avian reservoir would allow us to better understand the ecology of WNV.

  18. Improvements and Suggested Research • Improvements • more accurately matching bird and mosquito populations • understanding the life cycles and the relative contributions to the reservoir of different bird species • different bird species populations would probably have to modeled separately and then combined, the results may show interesting features of the ecology of the disease. • It is entirely possible that some of the values of the coefficients will never be found through field or laboratory studies. • In the long run, dynamic simulation may be the only way to gauge the relative importance of different coefficients of the WNV cycle.

More Related