390 likes | 533 Views
Social Security Issues in the 110 th Congress. NCPERS 2007. CONTEXT. United States Senate. House of Representatives. New Congressional Leadership. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY). Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).
E N D
Social Security Issues in the 110th Congress NCPERS 2007
New Congressional Leadership Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH)
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE • Previous Chair: Charles Grassley (R-IA) • New Chair: Max Baucus (D-MT)
HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE • Previous Chair: Bill Thomas (R-CA) • New Chair: Charlie Rangel (D-NY)
Reduces some public employees’ Social Security spousal or survivor benefits by two-thirds of their public pension.
WHOM DOES IT AFFECT? • Any public employee who does not pay into Social Security but whose spouse does/did. • public employee expects survivor benefits based on deceased spouse’s earnings.
Changes Social Security formula to reduce EARNED benefits of persons with a public pension. • Some employees lose up to $340 per month (maximum reduction for 2007) in Social Security.
WHOM DOES IT AFFECT? • Public employees receiving pension from job not covered by Social Security. • Affects benefits from: • Earnings in prior career; • Earnings in a non-offset state; • Earnings from part-time or summer jobs.
The Solution:Social Security Fairness Act • NEA worked to get re-introduced in House (H.R. 82) and Senate (S. 206) in first few days of the 110th Congress. • In last Congress, record numbers of Members of Congress cosponsored. • Need to rebuild cosponsor lists in the 110th Congress!
What Would the Bill Do? • Completely repeal GPO and WEP. • Anyone currently impacted would be helped prospectively. • Not retroactive to cover benefits already lost.
Why is it Taking So Long??? • Legislation takes on average 7-8 years to move through Congress. • Opposition from previous congressional leaders: • Cost (ten year cost of full repeal is over $60 billion) • Philosophical disagreement (“double dipping”)
New Opportunities? • New congressional leadership offers new opportunities. • New committee chairs with jurisdiction: • House Ways and Means – Charlie Rangel (D-NY), cosponsored repeal bill last year. • Senate Finance – Max Baucus (D-MT) – not a cosponsor in the past.
Will still have obstacles: • Cost continues to be an issue • Congress may continue to push issue off until they address larger Social Security reform
COALITION TO ASSURE RETIREMENT EQUITY (CARE) • NEA is a member, along with other unions, firefighters, police, etc. • Working together to target Members of Congress, activate grassroots, and conduct other activities in support of repeal.
What Can You Do? • Contact all Members of Congress: • Explain impact of offsets on you, your colleagues, your profession. • Thank cosponsors of House and Senate bills; urge all other Members to cosponsor the Social Security Fairness Act (H.R. 82/S.206).
Ask Governor to write Congress and state legislature to pass a resolution calling on Congress to repeal the GPO and WEP. • Organize a call-in day. • Deliver postcards to Members of Congress in their local offices. • Go to NEA website or website of your organization and send an e-mail message to Congress; ask friends, family, and co-workers to do the same.
Reach out to other impacted groups in your area. • Organize a rally. • Host a town hall meeting with a wide cross section of public employees. • Submit a letter to the editor or an op-ed to your local newspaper.
Talking Points • GPO and WEP take away benefits folks have EARNED by working for many years. • This is a national problem --there are affected people in all states.
Economic Impact: • Loss of income forces some people into poverty and onto expensive government programs like food stamps. • Impacted people have less $ to spend -- hurts local economies.
IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC SECTOR: • GPO and WEP discourage people from entering/staying in public sector professions. • If Congress wants to encourage people moving from private sector into public service, they must address the offsets! • These issues are important to voters!!
A Little History • At start of 109th Congress, Social Security was on the front-burner. • President was pushing privatization and the issue appeared on the fast track.
Where Are We Now? • VICTORY!!! Strong opposition from a broad coalition of groups stopped privatization proposals from moving. Social Security moved to the back-burner.
Outlook for 110th Congress • Unclear if/when Social Security will be on agenda. • Democrats in charge oppose privatization. • Dems.’ priorities for “1st 100 hours” included “fighting any attempt to privatize Social Security.”
CONTINUE TO OPPOSE ANY PRIVATIZATION!! • Would jeopardize secure retirement of many Americans. • Cost could reach over $1 trillion in ten years. • Would subject financial security to unpredictable ups and downs of the market.
The Issue • Some reform proponents suggest requiring Social Security participation for all public employees. • This is a bad idea: • Would weaken state and local plans. • Increase state and local financial burdens. • Won’t solve Social Security’s financial concerns.
Mandatory Coverage: Status • Strong bipartisan coalition in Congress opposed to mandatory coverage. • Issue off table until Social Security reform resurfaces.
? ? QUESTIONS ? ?