1 / 14

Semantics, Syndication and Social Networks: Mechanisms for Future Structured Information Spaces

This article discusses the importance of semantic metadata and its role in improving search capabilities and facilitating interoperability. It also explores the challenges and potential solutions in constructing and maintaining shared taxonomies and ontologies. Additionally, it explores the use of recommender systems, information extraction, and social software in enhancing information retrieval and knowledge organization. The article concludes with the discussion of future trends in the integration of technology and human language in the Knowledge Economy.

desrosiers
Download Presentation

Semantics, Syndication and Social Networks: Mechanisms for Future Structured Information Spaces

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Semantics, Syndication and Social Networks: Mechanisms for Future Structured Information Spaces • Hamish Cunningham (University of Sheffield) • Werner Haas (Johaneum Research) • Ant Miller (BBC) • Libby Miller (University of Bristol) • Ralph Traphoener (Empolis / Bertelsmann) • Paul Warren (British Telecom)

  2. What’s the difference between Mother Theresa and Tony Bliar? http://gate.ac.uk/http://nlp.shef.ac.uk/ Hamish Cunningham Dept. Computer Science, University of Sheffield

  3. Different types of metadata allow different types of search (but also incur different costs and have different limits) full text: "find me Nevsky in Bulgaria" taxonomy / thesaurus / semantic annotation / ontology: "find me churches in Eastern Europe" E.g. BBC's INFAX taxonomic system: 66% of searches would fail if only full text The web promotes diversity but also fragmentation; there's too much of it; less and less impact for curated data In face of this cultural memory institutions need Syndication and mediation (to pool outlets and multiply impact); this means presentation-independent, multipurpose content Users as assistants (to cut the cost of metadata); this can mean shared conceptualisations of content How do we get there? Why semantic metadata? 3

  4. The semantic web is about a semantic layer for interoperability, machine-readability, inference – ideal for semantic libraries? Problems: Construction and maintenance of shared taxonomies, terminologies & ontologies is expensive Annotation of content relative to them is v. expensive How does a machine tell the difference between "Mother Theresa is a Saint" and "Tony Blair is a Saint"? (Beyond the shallow and the general we get into typical AI problems, the contextual and shifting nature of meaning, etc.) The semantic web and why you can't have it (yet) 4

  5. Use recommender systems to make the users into curators’ assistants (who tells Google which page is important? other web users do, by linking; also Amazon) Allow curators and users to DIY simple specific ontologies and KBs (targetted adjuncts to general models like CIDOC) Use Information Extraction (IE) to populate semantic models Ride the next wave of social software and on-line communities (Wikis, Bloggs, OSN, file sharing / P2P, RSS/ATOM) Four promising directions 5

  6. Gartner, December 2002: taxonomic and hierachical knowledge mapping and indexing will be prevalent in almost all information-rich applications through 2012 more than 95% of human-to-computer information input will involve textual language A contradiction: to deal with the information deluge we need formal knowledge in semantics-based systems our archived history is in informal and ambiguous natural language The challenge: to reconcile these two phenomena IT context: the Knowledge Economy and Human Language 6

  7. HLT: Closing the Loop KEY MNLG: Multilingual Natural Language GenerationOIE: Ontology-aware Information ExtractionAIE: Adaptive IECLIE: Controlled Language IE (M)NLG Semantic Web; Semantic Grid;Semantic Web Services Formal Knowledge(ontologies andinstance bases) HumanLanguage OIE (A)IE ControlledLanguage CLIE 7

  8. Information Extraction (IE) pulls facts and structured information from the content of large text collections. Contrast IE and Information Retrieval NLP history: from NLU to IE Progress driven by quantitative measures MUC: Message Understanding Conferences ACE: Advanced Content Extraction General Architecture for Text Engineering (GATE): http://gate.ac.uk/ Information Extraction 8

  9. “The shiny red rocket was fired on Tuesday. It is the brainchild of Dr. Big Head. Dr. Head is a staff scientist at We Build Rockets Inc.” ST: rocket launch event with various participants IE Example • NE: "rocket", "Tuesday", "Dr. Head“, "We Build Rockets" • CO:"it" = rocket; "Dr. Head" = "Dr. Big Head" • TE: the rocket is "shiny red" and Head's "brainchild". • TR: Dr. Head works for We Build Rockets Inc. 9

  10. Bulgaria London XYZ UK Ontology-based IE XYZ was establishedon 03 November 1978 in London. It opened a plant in Bulgaria in … Ontology & KB Location Company HQ partOf City Country type type HQ type type establOn partOf “03/11/1978” 10

  11. A Necessary Trade-Off Domain specificity vs. task complexity: general acceptableaccuracy specificity domainspecific complexity complex simple bag-of-words events entities relations 11

  12. Trend 1: seconds out, round 5: file sharing is about to go social Trend 2: the living room is about to be computerised What will happen when all your living room devices fold into a single PC? Bill Gates hopes you'll be running Windoze, but Consumer Electronics firms bet on Linux & stable hardware (no viruses, no crashes, cheap, ...) What if these two trends combine? Ubiquitous on-line communities centred on shared content, with a model of trust What if memory institutions provide means of organising, explaining, interlinking the cross-over between modern popular culture and the curated memory? Important because DRM is the beginning of the end of civilisation as we know it (controls how you consume media you buy; has the potential to be linked with censorship and with invasive behaviour logging) you can't make digital objects behave like physical objects - unless you totally control the hardware and the operating system if someone has control, then we may end up finding that someone has given the contract for preserving our culture to Haliburton Open information, defended communities 12

  13. C21st: all the C20th mistakes but bigger & better? If you don’t know where you’ve been, how can you know where you’re going? Libraries, museums, archives: ammunition in the war on ignorance (more dangerous than “terror”?) Ammunition is useless if you can’t find it: new technology must make our history accessible to all, for all our futures Memory is not a luxury 13

  14. Cultural memory can benefit from semantic metadata, presentation-independence and repurposing Semantic web technology: no: it won’t make machines intelligent perhaps: simple specific models can work Four ways to cross the AI bridge: DIY models; recommenders; IE; OSN + P2P This talk: http://gate.ac.uk/talks/ecdl-sept-2004.ppt More: http://gate.ac.uk/●Related projects: Summary 14

More Related