190 likes | 389 Views
DEPARTMENT OF LAND AFFAIRS. BRIEFING BY THE MINISTER TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON THE INVESTIGATION OF THE MPUMALANGA REGIONAL LAND CLAIMS COMMISSION (RLCC) 10 MARCH 2004. CONTENT. Background Findings Recommendations Implementation of recommendations. BACKGROUND.
E N D
DEPARTMENTOF LAND AFFAIRS BRIEFING BY THE MINISTER TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON THE INVESTIGATION OF THE MPUMALANGA REGIONAL LAND CLAIMS COMMISSION (RLCC) 10 MARCH 2004
CONTENT • Background • Findings • Recommendations • Implementation of recommendations
BACKGROUND • The Internal Audit had already planned to conduct an audit on the entire commission • Investigation occasioned by media allegations on inflated land prices in Mpumalanga • Independent valuer was appointed to investigate the allegations
Findings by Independent Valuer • Market valuation principles and standards were not adhered to or were misconstrued by the valuers • There was incorrect application of valuation methods resulting in flagrant overstatement of market value
Findings by Independent Valuer (cont’d) • When using the sales selection method, the sales selected appeared subjective and selective to the point of misrepresentation of market conditions • No competent sales analysis were carried out and the guidelines applied by the valuers cannot be supported by the listed sales
Findings by Independent Valuer (cont’d) • No adequate or relevant research seems to have been carried out • Misconstruction & application of the correct valuation principles & comparables sales indicates miscomprehension, lack of knowledge, experience & competency in accordance with Standards and accepted or best valuation practice by the Valuers
Findings by Independent Valuer (cont’d) • Motivation of judgements is absent and/or unsupported and unconvincing • Mistakes found in the reports demonstrate sloppiness of an unacceptable standard • In general, it can be seen that the set standards and principles have not been adhered to by the valuers and therefore the valuations cannot be accepted as credible
SCOPE OF AUDIT • Audit covered the period 1 April 2003 to 31 August 2004 • Ndwada Community Project • Giba Community Project Phase 1 • Giba Community Project Phase 2 • Mapulana Tribal Community • Mashego Clan Project
FINDINGS: NDWANDWA PROJECT • Candidate valuer appointed instead of a qualified valuer, resulting in irregular valuation by a candidate valuer who was not supervised as required by the South African Council for Property Valuers • Extension of Terms of Reference of candidate valuer after the work in question was covered by another valuer who had an indirect interest in the businesses operated by the landowner
FINDINGS: NDWANDWA PROJECT (cont’d) • Improper use by the candidate valuer of the valuation report of another valuer appointed by the landowner • Candidate valuer used this report as basis of his report and manipulated the figures • The candidate valuer and the “landowner- appointed” valuer co-signed report
FINDINGS: NDWANDWA PROJECT (cont’d) • Project Officer processed payment despite being cautioned by the Deputy Director: Finance of calculation errors • Grant monies utilised to buy movable properties although the land bought was leased back to the seller/ original landowner • Sale and lease back was not disclosed in the agreement sale or approved submission to the Minister
FINDINGS: NDWANDWA PROJECT (cont’d) • One of the farms was leased back for R6 700 per month to the seller/ original landowner but the latter subsequently sublet it at a rate of R75 000 per month • Fundamental issue: that the beneficial use of the property remained with the seller/landowner
RECOMMENDATIONS: NDWANDWA PROJECT • Criminal investigations be considered regarding fundamental irregularities identified in the processing of the claim in terms of manipulation of valuations & the use of grants to purchase movable assets contrary to the decision of the community
IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS • Charge sheet for RLCC finalised • An advocate has been appointed to preside the disciplinary hearing • However, RLCC’s legal representative has requested a pre-dismissal arbitration, which will determine the way forward
IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS • The Human Resource Directorate is taking forward the disciplinary process of other affected officials • Adv G L Grobler has been appointed to consider instituting civil action against valuers, landowners and possibly the Commission staff
IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS • We are also identifying areas that might require criminal action. To this end, we will engage the Commercial Crime Unit of SAPS. • A letter has already been sent to the National Commissioner of Police • As part of the risk management plan the Chief Directorate:Financial Management will address concerns raised on the procurement process
IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS • New appointments have been made to capacitated the RLCC Office.