1 / 5

“THE” Arctic Observing Network: A perspective from program to international

“THE” Arctic Observing Network: A perspective from program to international. Erica Key National Science Foundation Arctic Observing Network Program. NSF-AON Competition Status. Deadline for NSF AON proposals: October 21, 2014 New language in the solicitation is two-fold:

devin-freeman
Download Presentation

“THE” Arctic Observing Network: A perspective from program to international

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “THE” Arctic Observing Network: A perspective from program to international Erica Key National Science Foundation Arctic Observing Network Program

  2. NSF-AON Competition Status Deadline for NSF AON proposals: October 21, 2014 New language in the solicitation is two-fold: Draws off of input at OSTP / OMB meeting in January and governance webinars Allows for development of value-added products - leveraging existing NSF-AON catalog and other agency contributions - supports interoperable, intercomparable measurements - builds capacity for integrated, interdisciplinary, or system measurements - increases connectivity with PLR CI program through co-review Encourages long-term vision for network design - spurs proposers to consider scales and targets for observing - integrates project and risk management concepts into design - furthers “science of measurement” as opposed to maintenance - develops metrics to evaluate return on investment

  3. Current observing-related strategic activities Use-inspired science / Return on investment All: Arctic Observing Assessment National: US GEO Assessment, USGCRP Our Changing Planet Agency: TPIO Visualization (NOAA) Governance and planning All: Arctic Observing Viewer IARPC: Master Schedule NSF-AON: Webinar series and distributed input Coordination and communication All: ArcticHub, Arctic Observing Viewer, Arctic Observing Assessment International: Belmont Forum Arctic CRA, French Arctic Strategy Operation (awareness, partnership) All: Arctic Observing Viewer, ArcticHub, Arctic Observing Assessment International: Belmont Forum Arctic CRA, Canadian Observing Inventory IARPC: Agency/Organization Webinars, Cross-Cut Webinars NSF-AON: Outreach materials

  4. Outputs and potential uses Arctic Observing Assessment Demonstrate gaps/strengths in: - documented user needs - interoperable information - available data integration tools and accessible formats - observing, monitoring, inventory, assessment of requested fields Arctic Observing Viewer Visualize and document available observations to: - showcase coverage and link to archives - encourage “neighbor” interchanges within/between sciences - provide information for out-year, shortfall planning and coordination - identify interdisciplinary or system nodes or hotspots - provide accessibility to a range of users ArcticHub Connect a broad observing community by: - highlighting available online resources and tools for observing - hosting Arctic Observing Assessment build-out and web interface - providing tailored communication and workspaces for thematic groups - enabling user input to site functionality

  5. Considerations and conversations for the future for NSF-AON and the broader AON universe Grids, nodes, hotspots, and realizing a “design” - What is the return on investment in science and management of remote deployments? - Does place-based design encourage more integrated, system-type measurement? - How do we maximize the constellation and varying time coverage we have? - Who benefits from an institutionalized observing suite? Balancing global with local - Is there value in aggregating large volumes of questionable quality data? - Can we quantify relative change (amplitude and frequency) using non-traditional information from personal devices or off-the-shelf sensors? - How is this balanced against high accuracy information held to global standard? Exceeding original intentions - How is “fundamental” observing re-purposed? - Where is the line between research and management when it comes to observing? - Should areas where user needs are defined receive top priority?

More Related