380 likes | 514 Views
Arctic Gas Symposium American Conference Institute. November 18-19, 2002 The Renaissance Houston Hotel Houston, Texas. Arctic Gas Symposium Canadian Oilfield Services Perspective. Discussion: Canadian Drilling Activity Forecast Canadian Arctic Pipeline Kyoto Protocol. Canadian Drilling
E N D
Arctic Gas Symposium American Conference Institute November 18-19, 2002 The Renaissance Houston Hotel Houston, Texas
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Discussion: • Canadian Drilling Activity Forecast • Canadian Arctic Pipeline • Kyoto Protocol
Canadian Drilling Activity Forecast
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective • Document Highlights: • Total Meters Drilled by Area, By Status (Gas, Oil, etc.) • Average Meters Drilled per Well by Area • Break-Out: Directional, Horizontal, Vertical • Break-Out: Developmental, Exploratory, Re-entry • Average License to Spud Days per Area • Average Spud to Rig Release Days per Area • Top 20 Operators by Area • License issued by Target Depth per Area
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective 2002 Commodity Price Assumptions: • Avg. Gas price: CDN (AECO) $4.00/Mcf • Avg. Oil price: US (WTI) $26.00/barrel Wells Drilled (Rig released): 15,100
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective PSAC 2002 Rig Release Forecast Breakdown: 2002 October Update • AB: 11,210 • BC: 635 • SK: 3,050 • MB: 85 • North 6012 • Other: 108 • Total: 15,100
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Well Type Breakdown: 2002e Gas 61.6% Oil 28.1% Other 10.3%
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Capital Expenditures (C$billions): 2002e Drill & Complete Capital Expenditures $6.0
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective 2003 Highlights: • Higher well count • Strong commodity prices • Increased activity in Foothills and NEBC • Strong shallow gas drilling
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective 2003 Commodity Price Assumptions: • Avg. Gas price: CDN (AECO) $4.75/Mcf • Avg. Oil price: US (WTI) $24.25/barrel Wells Drilled (Rig released): 16,500
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Year to Year Comparisons (CND $Billions): Drill & Complete Year Capital Expenditures 2003e $7.0 2002e $6.0 2001e $9.0 2000e $8.0 Source: PSAC, FirstEnergy, ARC Financial
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective PSAC 2002/3 Rig Release Forecast Breakdown: 2002 2003 ForecastForecast • AB: 11,210 12,350 • BC: 635 805 • SK: 3,050 3,150 • MB: 85 80 • North 60 12 15 • Other: 108 100 • Total: 15,100 16,500
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Well Type Breakdown: 2003e 2002e Gas 62.3% 61.6% Oil 27.3% 28.1% Other 10.4% 10.3%
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Northern Canada • Conventional Crude Oil Reserves (Billion Barrels) • Canada 4.7 • North 60 0.1 • Gas Reserves (Tcf) • Canada 65.6 • North 60 6.0 Source: CAAP, PSAC
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Northern Canada Potential • Potential Conventional Crude Oil Reserves (Billion barrels) • North 60 2.0 • Potential Gas Reserves (Tcf) • North 60 60 Source: PSAC
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Northern Canada • Oil production since 1943, currently 25,000 bbl/day • Gas production since 1972, currently 0.15 Bcf/day • Approximately 1,400 wells drilled to date versus 335,000 for the rest of Canada Source: CAAP
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective • Canadian Crude Oil North 60 • Production – 2.2 million bbl/day 25,000 bbl/day • Exports – 1.3 million bbl/day • Canadian Natural Gas • Production – 17.4 Bcf/day 0.15 Bcf/day • Exports – 10.6 Bcf/day Source: CAAP
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Mackenzie Gas Pipeline • Project Developers • Imperial Oil • Conoco Canada • Shell Canada • Aboriginal Pipeline Group
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Mackenzie Gas Pipeline • Developing onshore natural gas fields in the Mackenzie Delta (6 Tcf currently) • Taglu (3 Tcf) • Parsons Lake (1.8 Tcf) • Niglintgak (1 Tcf) Source: Imperial Oil
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Mackenzie Gas Pipeline • Project Costs • C$3 Billion – pipeline construction • C$1 Billion – field development Source: Imperial Oil
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Mackenzie Gas Pipeline • Expected Production Rates (three existing fields) • 800 Mcf/day to 1.0 Bcf/day in natural gas production • 10,000 bbl/day to 15,000 bbl/day in associated NGLs Source: Imperial Oil
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Mackenzie Gas Pipeline • Anticipated Timing • Submission of applications for regulatory approval in 2003 • Production start up in 2007 to 2008 Source: Imperial Oil
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Mackenzie Gas Pipeline • Initial capacity of 1.2 Bcf/day • Expandable to 1.9 Bcf/day through additional compression facilities
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Nature of Northern Work • Seasonal • Cyclical • Long Term • Expensive
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective “Managing Expectations” • Producers • Local Aboriginal communities/businesses • Service suppliers • Government
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective Local Communities/Business • Go slow….take the time to do it right • Lifestyle • Jobs • Training programs
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective • Kyoto Protocol – Canadian Situation: • Target CO2 reductions – 5% below 1990 • 1990 CO2 emissions – 607 mega tonnes (2% world emissions) • 2010 Projections - 810+ mega tonnes – (30% reduction to meet target)
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective • Kyoto Protocol – Canadian Situation: • Ratification • Full-Soft • Canadian Parliament December 2002
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective • Kyoto Protocol – Canadian Situation: • Ratification • Full-Soft • Canadian Parliament December 2002
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective “What we need to do is end the debate about ratification and begin being clear about what the measures are that we’re going to need to implement. Nobody is going to come in and seize our property or charge us a penalty if we don’t achieve the (Kyoto) targets…..” John Manley, Finance Minister November 14, 2002 Calgary Herald
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective • Kyoto Protocol – Poll Results: Jun ’02 Nov’02 Pro Con Pro Con Canada 86% 14% 74% 26% Ontario 87% 13% 75% 25% Alberta 72% 28% 40% 60%
Arctic Gas SymposiumCanadian Oilfield ServicesPerspective • Kyoto Protocol – Canadian Situation: • Personal Views
Arctic Gas Symposium American Conference Institute For further information or to subscribe to the document, please visit: WWW.PSAC.CA