460 likes | 477 Views
Presidency of Harry Truman. Cold War is the central fact of U.S. diplomacy from 1945-1990 Pre-war and WWII tension with the Soviets Truman’s background Truman did not cause the Cold War, but his policies and attitudes contributed Truman is counseled to get tough with the Soviets.
E N D
Presidency of Harry Truman • Cold War is the central fact of U.S. diplomacy from 1945-1990 • Pre-war and WWII tension with the Soviets • Truman’s background • Truman did not cause the Cold War, but his policies and attitudes contributed • Truman is counseled to get tough with the Soviets
Presidency of Harry Truman • Truman ends Lend-Lease to USSR and stalls loan request • Truman “chews out” Soviet ambassador • Stalin’s paranoia contributed to the Cold War • Stalin wants “total security” in Eastern Europe
Possible American Responses to the Cold War Tension • Traditional Isolation • Cooperate with the Soviets • Turn the Cold War into a Hot War • “Containment”
American Assumptions AboutSoviet Communism • Communism is monolithic. • Worldwide communism is centrally directed by Moscow. • Communism is infinitely expansive. • Communism is a threat to American trade. • Communism is a threat to democratic institutions. • Communism is evil morally. • No room for neutrality in a bi-polar world. • U.S. is militarily and diplomatically omnipotent.
The Cold War [1945-1991]: An Ideological Struggle Soviet & Eastern Bloc Nations[“Iron Curtain”] US & the Western Democracies GOAL “Containment” of Communism & the eventual collapse [George Kennan] GOALspread world-wide Communism • METHODOLOGIES: • Espionage [KGB vs. CIA] • Arms Race [nuclear escalation] • Ideological Competition for the minds and hearts of Third World peoples [Communist govt. & command economy vs. democratic govt. & capitalist economy] “proxy wars” • Bi-Polarization of Europe [NATO vs. Warsaw Pact]
The Bipolarization of Europe
George Kennan [“X Article”]: CONTAINMENTGoals Means Actual Application • Restorationof the balance of power Encouragement of self-confidence in nations threatened by Soviet expansion. Long-term program of U.S. economic assistance [Marshall Plan] Exploitation of tensions in international communism. Cooperation with communist regimes; [supporting Titoism in Yugoslavia] • Reduction of Soviet ability to project outside power.
George Kennan [“X Article”]: CONTAINMENT Goals Means Actual Application • Modification of the Soviet concept of international relations. Negotiating settlement of outstanding differences. Using “carrots & sticks’; containing Germany with an embrace and Russia at arms length.
Cold War Division of Germany
1945 - Divided and Occupied 1948 - Separate Currencies 1949 - FRG Announced (West) GDR Announced (East) 1955 - FRG joins NATO GDR joins Warsaw Pact 1961 - Berlin Wall Built
The Cold War in Europe • Soviet pressure on Greece and Turkey • The “Truman Doctrine” (March, 1947) • The “Marshall Plan” (June, 1947) • U.S. motivations in offering this aid
The Berlin Crisis and Airlift • Soviet blockade of western Berlin • Possible Soviet aims • Possible U.S. responses • Berlin Airlift -“Operation Vittles” • June, 1948-May, 1949: 1.5 million tons of supplies delivered
The Creation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization – NATO • Successful Soviet test of an atomic weapon (September, 1949) • Nuclear proliferation • NSC-68 • NATO created (April, 1949) • Soviet perception of this alliance • Warsaw Pact (1955)
Berlin Crisis, 1958-61 GDR’s desire for recognition by West USSR’s hopes for peace treaties & removal of atomic weaponry from FRG Khrushchev ultimatum for West to leave West Berlin within 6 months • Western intransigence & threat of nuclear weapons to preserve West Berlin; but non-intervention in East Berlin • Economic race to overtake West German economy falters in 1960 • Wall cheap alternative to subsidies by USSR
China • Civil War resumed after WWII between communists and nationalists • The “Long March” of Mao Zedong • No U.S. desire for a military commitment to China • Possible U.S. responses to the situation in China
China • Containment apparently failed in China • U.S. omnipotence is drawn into question • Failure to recognize this war as one fought for nationalism • U.S. relations with Communist China Nonexistent
Tensions • During the 1940’s, political tensions were building in Korea • Japan had ruled Korea from 1910-1945, but had been driven out by the United States and the Soviet Union. • 1945-the Allies had divided Korea into two zones, the Soviets occupied the northern zone and U.S. troops occupied the southern zone.
U.S. Involvement • South Korea was unstable economically • The United States feared that South Korea would fall to communism • U.S. government helped to build up the South Korean military • Both the U.S. and the Soviets removed their troops from Korea in 1949.
Korean War[1950-1953] Kim Il-Sung Syngman Rhee “Domino Theory”
Fighting Begins • North Korea invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950. • The UN became involved and asked for an immediate cease fire • The Soviets were boycotting the U.N. due to the denial of admittance of China to the world governing body
The Korean War • “Temporary” division of Korea into 2 zones • No national security interest in Korea • The call for free elections • North Korean invasion of South Korea (June, 1950) • United Nations’ sanction of the Korean War • The “Pusan” perimeter
Support for South Korea • June 27th-The U.N. Security Council labeled North Korea as an aggressor and offered support to South Korea • The U.S. sponsored this resolution • U.S. forces entered South Korea under the direction General MacArthur • 15 other countries gave military and monetary support, however no other country gave the same support that the United States did.
The Korean War • MacArthur’s landing at Inchon • Threat of the introduction of Chinese forces on behalf of North Korea • MacArthur calls for a “new war” against the Chinese and North Korea • Rift develops between MacArthur and Truman
Split Power • By September the North Koreans had pushed the U.S. and South Korean forces into a retreat • September 15, 1950, General MacArthur led a counterattack and recaptured Seoul, which is South Korea’s capital • The UN and U.S. forces were hit with a counterattack from the North Koreans and eventually had to settle with a defensive line at the 38th parallel
The Korean War • The “lesson” of Korea • Peace talks (1951) and the Election of 1952 • Eisenhower visits Korea and pressures the North Koreans for an armistice (July, 1953)
China’s Involvement • China aided North Korea in late November. • Due to China’s involvement, General MacArthur called for a major expansion of the war. His proposal included: • Blockading China’s coast • Invading the interior of China
Conflict Regarding the Plan • Supporters of MacArthur’s plan said it would overthrow the Communist regime in China • Opponents argued that blockading China could entice the Soviets to become involved
Truman’s Response • President Truman opposed MacArthur’s plan • Truman removed MacArthur from his position in April 1951 • The war had reached a stalemate by the summer of 1951. • The war became a hot button issue in election of 1952
Election of 1952 • Republican candidate Dwight D. Eisenhower • Democrat candidate Adlai Stevenson • Eisenhower promised to end the Korean war yet still resist the spread of Communism • Eisenhower won the electoral college 442-89 President Eisenhower http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/de34.html
The War Ends • Eisenhower stayed true to his word to end the war • Bombing raids increased by the U.S. in North Korea in May of 1953 • July 27th, 1953 an armistice was agreed upon. • The outcome of the war was the same dividing line that was present before the start of the war, approximately around the 38th parallel
Final Outcome http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/macarthur/maps/koreatxt.html
The Foreign Policy of Dwight Eisenhower • Ike’s need to present a “tougher line” than containment • Eisenhower’s Secretary of State John Foster Dulles • Ike’s foreign policy: -- “roll back” -- “New Look” -- “massive retaliation” -- “brinksmanship”
VIII. Eisenhower’s Foreign Policy (cont.) • All of this talk appeared to be mainly campaign rhetoric • Eastern European nations feel betrayed by tough-talking U.S. • SEATO created (1954) • METO created (1955) • “Ring around the Soviet Union”
VIII. Eisenhower’s Foreign Policy (cont.) • Ike’s “Open Skies” proposal (July, 1955) • Traditional U.S. sympathy with Israel • Ike tries to build bridges to the Arabs • Israeli invasion of Egypt in 1956 and Ike’s response • The Eisenhower Doctrine (July, 1958)
VIII. Eisenhower’s Foreign Policy (cont.) • CIA interventions abroad during the Eisenhower years • Apparent “thaw” in the Cold War (1959) • The U-2 spy plane incident (May, 1960) • The “problem” of Fidel Castro in Cuba (January, 1959)
IX. Post-Eisenhower Foreign Policy • Kennedy’s “tough talk” and the “myth” of the missile gap • JFK’s interest in “flexible response” and special forces units • The Bay of Pigs fiasco (1961) • Soviets build the Berlin Wall
IX. Post-Eisenhower Foreign Policy (cont.) • JFK perpetuates traditional containment policy • Cuban Missile Crisis (October, 1962) • After the Cuban crisis, JFK began to moderate his tough stand against the Soviets
IX. Post-Eisenhower Foreign Policy (cont.) • LBJ and containment policy in Vietnam • Richard Nixon’s historic visit to China (February, 1972) • Wedge driven between China and the USSR • Nixon’s visit to Moscow (May, 1972) --SALT talks and trade agreements
IX. Post-Eisenhower Foreign Policy (cont.) • Reliance on Arab oil makes the Middle East a continuing problem for US foreign policy • Henry Kissinger’s “shuttle diplomacy” • Carter’s Camp David Accords (1977) • Carter and Détente • Reagan’s return to containment • Post-Cold War realities