1 / 34

REACH Otevřené otázky ve 2. čtení

REACH Otevřené otázky ve 2. čtení. Karel Bláha Odbor environmentálních rizik Ministerstvo životního prostředí Kouty n. Desnou, 18. 5. 2006. Registra ce. Hlavní změny v těchto oblastech Rozsah Preregistra ce, existující látky Požadavky na registraci především v pásmu 1-10 t /rok

dewitt
Download Presentation

REACH Otevřené otázky ve 2. čtení

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. REACHOtevřené otázky ve 2. čtení Karel Bláha Odbor environmentálních rizik Ministerstvo životního prostředí Kouty n. Desnou, 18. 5. 2006

  2. Registrace Hlavní změny v těchto oblastech • Rozsah • Preregistrace, existující látky • Požadavky na registraci především v pásmu 1-10 t/rok • Látky ve výrobcích • Sdílení dat, společné předložení

  3. Rozsah registrace Hlava I Článek 2 Přílohy II a III

  4. Scope of Registration • Clarification of exemptions for foods and feedingstuffs and recycled materials • Little change to Annex II; cellulose pulp • Annex III • Minerals, ores and ore concentrates • Cement clinker • Other substances occurring in nature if not dangerous

  5. Pre-registration and phase-in Titles II and III • Article 21 • Article 26

  6. Pre-registration and phase-in • A single pre-registration phase 12 – 18 months after entry into force • Information on possible groups to be submitted for read across • Those entering market after entry into force may use phase-in period • Early registration of PBTs/vPvBs over 100 tonnes

  7. Pre-registration and phase-in Notification of SVHCs in SIA Agency start up Pre-registration • 1000+ tonnes • CMRs 1+ tonne • PBTs/vPvBs (R50-53) • 100+ tonnes 100-1000 tonnes 1-100 tonnes Non-phase-in substances [6 months] EIF 12 months 3 years 6 years 11 years 18 months

  8. Registration requirements Title II • Articles 9, 11, 12 Annexes Ic, IV – IX

  9. Registration requirements • 1 – 10 tonnes, targeted approach: • Maintains industry responsibility • For phase-in substances only • Minimum physchem always • Full Annex V (+3) if one of two criteria met • 10 – 100 tonnes: • One reproductive toxicity test only • Possibility of exposure-based waiving

  10. Data sharing and joint submission Title II • Articles 10 and 17 Title III

  11. Data sharing and joint submission • Key elements of OSOR included • Sharing of animal data mandatory • Sharing of non-animal data mandatory if requested • Joint submission of key parts of the dossier with possibility of “opt-out”; • Disproportionate cost • Disclosure of confidential information • Disagreement on data

  12. Substances in articles Title II • Article 6 Title IV • Article 30 Title VII • Article 55

  13. Substances in articles • Provisions closer to those for substances • Registration – substances intentionally released above 1 tonne • Notification – SVHCs contained in articles • Agency power to request registration • Duty for suppliers to provide information on SVHCs in articles • Restrictions possible for SVHCs

  14. Authorisation Changes made to: • Identification of substances • Granting of authorisations • Conditions of authorisation

  15. Identification of substances Title VII • Articles 54 and 56

  16. Identification of substances • Scope of authorisation as in Commission proposal but… • Substances of equivalent concern clarified in Article 54(f) – “irreversible” removed • Agency to develop and publish a candidate list

  17. Granting of authorisations Title VII • Articles 57 and 59

  18. Granting of authorisations • Authorisation clarified and strengthened • Adequate control NOT applicable: • To CMRs and equivalent concern where a safe threshold cannot be determined • PBTs and vPvBs • All applications to include an analysis of alternatives

  19. Conditions of authorisation Title VII • Articles 57 and 58

  20. Conditions of authorisation • All authorisation to be subject to a time-limited review • Set on a case-by-case basis; no specific maximum time-limit • Authorisations shall normally subject to monitoring

  21. Issues subject to changes in the EP Key changes made to: • Information and downstream users • Evaluation • Fees and the Agency • Access to information • Scope of the Regulation

  22. Scope of the Regulation Title I • Articles 1 to 3a

  23. Scope of the Regulation • Exemption for wastes • Consolidation of all exemptions under Article 2 • Important definitions eg: alloys, phase-in substances, use and exposure categories • New provision for appointment of third party representative

  24. Supply chain and downstream users Titles IV and V • Articles 29, 34, 35

  25. Supply chain and downstream users • Safety data sheets for PBTs/vPvBs and preparations containing them • Downstream user CSR threshold of 1 tonne of substance or preparation • Must assess risks and report to Agency • Deletion of Annex Ib

  26. Evaluation Title VI

  27. Evaluation • Agency responsible for dossier evaluation • Minimum 5% with priorities • One EU-wide rolling plan for substance evaluation • Agency responsible for co-ordinating, relying on Competent Authorities

  28. Fees and the Agency New Title VIIIa Title IX • Articles 75, 101a

  29. Fees and the Agency • New Title on fees, which are to be established in a Commission Regulation • Help for SMEs – lower fees • Incentives on OSOR, 1 – 10 tonnes • Management board – one member per MS • Language regime of the Agency

  30. Access to information Title XI

  31. Access to information • Rules for access to information to be agreed by Management Board • Some information always to be made public on website • Subject to Agency decision and payment of fee, possibility for industry to justify not publishing some information

  32. Conclusion • Political agreement – good balance between health, environment and competitiveness • Impact on industry in particular SMEs minimised • Benefits maximised

  33. Zdroj:Summary of Council’s political agreementGian Marco CurradoChemicals & GM Policy DivisionDefra, UKVienna, March 29, 2006

  34. Děkuji za pozornostkarel_blaha@env.cz

More Related