190 likes | 207 Views
Join us for a practical workshop where you will learn how to benchmark your website effectively using auditing tools and evaluating metrics. Collaborate with peers to enhance your site's performance and gain insights into common website problems. Develop your understanding of quality assurance methodologies to prevent issues and optimize your web presence. This interactive workshop aims to empower you with the skills and knowledge to improve your website's performance.
E N D
Effective Web Site Training Workshop:Benchmarking Web Sites Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath Email B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk URL http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ UKOLN is supported by:
Timetable • 10:00 Registration • 10:15 Welcome • 10:30 Benchmarking Web Sites • 11:00 Hands-on Benchmarking Exercise • 12:30 Lunch • 13:30 Hands-on Benchmarking Exercise (cont) • 14:30 Report Back • 14:45 Quality Assurance • 15:00 Discussion • 16:00 Conclusions • 16:30 Workshop ends NOTE Times are subject to change
A Bit About Me... • Brian Kelly: • UK Web Focus – a post funded by JISC and MLA to advise HE / FE and MLA communities on effective use of the Web • Based in UKOLN – a national focus of expertise in digital information management • Based at the University of Bath • Involved in Web since 1993, while working in Computing Service at University of Leeds • Links with IT Service & Library communities • The workshop has been informed by UKOLN’s WebWatch work and the WebWatch column in Ariadne
D A Bit About You... • In small groups address the questions: • Who are you, where do you work and what do you do? • What do you want to get out of this workshop?
Your Expectations Learning Best practices Sharing Your Interests & expectations Quality Finances Testing Staffing Checking Constraints
Session Aims • This session: • Hands-on exercises with group discussions • By the end of the session you should: • Be able to benchmark your Web site in relation to other sites in your community • Have had hands-on experience in using auditing and evaluating tools • Be aware of common problems • Be aware of how a quality assurance methodology can help to avoids problems • Be in a position to decide whether to adopt this methodology in your organisation, region, sector, …
Today’s Exercises (1) • You will: • Use a set of Web-based tools for evaluating a variety of aspects of your Web site • Work in small groups and share your findings and discuss the implications • This session: • Encourages collaboration and sharing • Is not meant to be competitive!
E Today’s Exercises (2) • In the hands-on exercises your will evaluate: • The size of your organisation’s home page • The accessibility of your home page • The validation of your home page • How popular your Web site is • How many sites link to it • How many people visit it • How your Web site looks with different browsers • Etc. Now open the exercises handout
The Size of Your Home Page Ex. 1.1 • You can find out the size of your home page using various tools: • NetMechanic • Bobby • … http://www.netmechanic.com/
Does it Work? Ex. 1 • It is useful to check key pages for accessibility, validation and functionality • Web page validators include: • NetMechanic • Dr Watson • DrHTML - single pages only • … http://watson.addy.com/
Is it Accessible? Ex. 2 • The Bobby Web service can check the accessibility of individual Web pages • The Bobby Java application can check the accessibility of Web sites (now licensed software) • WAVE is an alternative to Bobby http://bobby.watchfire.com/
Are There Broken Links? Ex. 2.6 • Monitoring the number of broken links on your Web site is very important • Desktop and Web-based tools are available: • Xenu • LinkAlarm • Linkguard • Nodeworks • NetMechanic • SiteValet • … http://www.linkalarm.com/
How Popular Is Your Site? Ex. 3.13.2 • There are a number of services that will tell you how many pages link to your Web site • WebSiteGarage • LinkPopularity • Netscape’s What’s Related service is used through the Netscape browser http://www.linkpopularity.com/
What About Other Browsers? Ex. 4 http://www.anybrowser.com/ • Does your home page (and Web site) work in: • Netscape very popular in UK HE) • IE (the most widely used browser) • Significant (all?) versions and platforms of above • Lynx (text browser which may be used by visually impaired) • AnyBrowser • DejaVu
E Benchmarking Exercises • You have: • Benchmarked your Web site in relation to others in your community • Recorded your findings • And learnt about: • Some of the issues involved when using externally hosted Web tools • Other benchmarking activities • WebWatch surveys of communities Once you have completed the exercises, report on your findings
Home Page Size Issues • There are certain issues necessary for consideration when using these tools: • What is a home page? • Splash screens • Spawning new windows • Frames • Graphics and graphics folders • Dynamic pages • robot.txt files See <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/web-watch/>
Other Benchmarking Activities • What other type of benchmarking activities are useful? • Monitoring Content Quality and ‘Freshness’ • New developments and technologies - scripts, other markup languages, personalisation • Stress and security • Search engine used on site and 404 pages • Server numbers • Visibility on search engines • Usability e.g. by evaluating user feedback • Performance checkers and Independent testing services
Implementing A Benchmark Survey • To implement your own WebWatch- style benchmark across a community you can simply examine WebWatch articles and adapt the HTML for your own use. • Further details at <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue29/web-watch/> • Technique Used • Use the Web service on a site • Copy URL into template • Determine URL structure • Use as basis for use with other URLs http://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/bobbyServlet?URL= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mla.gov.uk%2F&output=Submit&gl=wcag1-aaa
Conclusion • Different tools give different results and results can be limited. The results should be analysed carefully - like statistics • Independent testing services can be beneficial • Comparison is useful • However a league table is not enough, for this type of evaluation. To have a point there should be follow up action Any questions?