Areas of Assessment/Evaluation

1. Areas of Assessment/Evaluation • Learner assessment • Teacher competencies • Textbook review • School development/school reform

2. REAP Evaluation • Rights-Education-Action Project • 12 countries over 10 years, 2-3 year grants, renewable • Required AI Sections/Structures to identify clear strategies for HRE involving use of “multipliers” within different sectors

3. Key Target Groups • Teachers/educational specialists • Students (high school and university) • Civil society groups • Civil servants (e.g., prison staff) • Others (e.g., journalists)

4. Overview of Data Collection • Surveys administered to HRE Coordinators, Key Trainers, Multipliers and Beneficiaries in 10 countries • Five-day site visits carried out in four countries: Malaysia, Morocco, Poland and South Africa • Document analysis: REAP reports, training materials, media coverage

5. Methodological Comments • No controls or comparisons (yet) • Post-only results, relying on self-reporting excepting for partners in case studies • “Best case” sources • Some triangulation across categories of respondents and for case study countries visited

6. Impacts on Amnesty at Program/Institutional Level 1.Over course of REAP programming, significant increases in AI membership, the establishment of local groups and participation in actions which were associated in part with REAP programming

7. Impacts on Amnesty at Program/Institutional Level 2.Increase in internal capacity to deliver HRE, as evidenced through increase in number of key trainers, number of training materials developed or adapted, and organization of trainings for multipliers

8. Impacts on Amnesty at Program/Institutional Level 3.New partnerships for Amnesty established in relation to HRE, among other NGOs, CBOs, GOs, schools and universities. Across all REAP sites, the number of partnerships increased from 208 to 1,241.

9. Impacts of HRE Programming on Society • Influenced programming of other organizations (integration of HRE and connection with AI actions) • Successful lobbying of GOs in relation to HRE (e.g., Ministries of Education supporting HRE in schools)

10. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Facilitation Skills/Skills for Material Development/Adaptation (Multipliers) 1=not at all, 3=somewhat, 5=a great deal • Overall 4.40 and 4.26, respectively, with gains of 1.60 for each • Gains positively associated with hours of participation in the training program

11. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Understanding HR principles and standards • M: Post- rating of 4.49, w/ avg. gain 1.43 • B: Post-rating of 3.92 • M: No significant differences on the basis of gender, target group, hours of participation (although lowest gains noted for lowest levels of part.) • B: Especially high av. rating (4.60) for civil servants

12. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Importance of standing up for own HR • M: Post- rating of 4.84, w/ avg. gain .95 • B: Post-rating of 4.62 • M: Gains of 1.50+ for South Africa, members of civil society, and participation levels 101+ hours • B: Civil society rating noticeable lower

13. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Importance of standing up for others’ human rights • M: Post- rating of 4.81, w/ avg. gain .94 • B: Post-rating of 4.41 • B: Civil society rating noticeable lower

14. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Positively influenced concern for others • M: Post- rating of 4.65, w/ avg. gain 1.17 • B: Post-rating of 4.02 • M: Largest gains for those with lowest levels of participation (although overall rating is 3.0) • B: Appears to be positive association w/ hours of participation

15. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Committed to taking action • M: Post- rating of 4.61, w/ avg. gain 1.31 • B: Post-rating of 3.80 • M: Gains of 1.5+ for students and civil society members • B: Appears to be positive association w/ hours of participation; results noticeably higher for teachers

16. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • New activities of beneficiaries • Workshops (20%) • Awareness-raising activities (16%) • Social service work (16%) • Participation in HR/HRE related work organized by other organizations (8%) • Actions (8%) • Dialogue with others about HR (8%)

17. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Changes in pre-existing activities of beneficiaries • More respectful of others (15%) • Learned more about HR (13%) • Empowerment (13%) • Developed positive opinion towards HR (9%) • Behavioral (8%) • Promoting HR (6%)

18. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • More respectful of others (15%) “Personally I uphold human rights in everyday dealings, such as respecting others and being cautious not to hury their dignity, and to resist raciaal discrimination.” - Morocco

19. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Learned more about HR (13%) “I have gotten information about what I can fight for, about people in different cultures and about possibilities of help.” - Poland

20. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Empowerment (13%) “I tend to speak up for myself if I see injustice in my classroom or with friends.” - Malaysia

21. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Developed positive opinion towards HR (9%) “I became more aware of the importance of helping people if they are in trouble. That we’re all equal and that nobody’s human rights are worth less than mine.” - Slovenia

22. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Behavioral (8%) “Registration at school of my daughters in spite of the opposition of my husband…Telling my husband that I am aware of women’s rights and do not accept violence against me and my daughters.” - Morocco

23. Impacts of HRE Programming on Individual Participants • Promoting HR (6%) “People are speaking out and reporting the cases if she or he is abused.” – South Africa