310 likes | 442 Views
Project Management System Based on Work-Breakdown-Structure Process Model. Satoshi Awane. Topics. Introduction Summary of “Pro-Navi” and “PRO-NAVI WBS” Project Management with “Pro-Navi” Application example Evaluation. 1. Introduction. What is project management?. *What is Project?
E N D
Project Management SystemBased on Work-Breakdown-Structure Process Model Satoshi Awane
Topics • Introduction • Summary of “Pro-Navi” and “PRO-NAVI WBS” • Project Management with “Pro-Navi” • Application example • Evaluation
What is project management? *What is Project? • What is Project management? Why a system to support project management is needed?
ISSUES of PROJECT MANAGEMENT *“Integrated management of process, work, outcomes, and know-how” Mutual mapping with “WBS process model” -Clarify process/work/outcome at planning -Grasp project progress status -Standardize and navigate development process -Share knowledge: outcomes, know-how, .. We realized with “PRO-NAVI”
“Pro-Navi” data structure • Project information • WBS • Work related information • Mutual dependency • Common rules, etc., • Management information of a WORK • Due dates • Assigned member • Status • Outcomes(documents)
ソフトウェア開発 >> 基本設計 >> 【ソフトウェア要件定義】 作業・成果物一覧[項目編集] 作業・成果物名称 作成日 担当者 期限 概要検討 佐藤 99/11/1 ・概要検討 メモ99/11/1 14:00 高橋 99/11/1 基本仕様書 佐藤 99/12/10 基本仕様書レビュー 森沢 99/12/11 ・基本設計書レビュー報告書 大泉 99/12/11 ソフトウェア開発 >> システム計画 >> 【基本設計】 必要資料一覧[項目編集] 資料名称 作成日 担当者 期限 開発計画書 99/9/30 22:10 東山 99/10/1 Prnv Project WorkSpace(PJAP00012) – □□□ File(F) Edit (E) View(V) Move(G) Booknmark(A) Help(H) • 関連規則 [項目編集] • SSS DD01 基本仕様書作成基準 • SSS DC08 ソフトウェア開発におけるデザイ • 関連情報 [項目編集] • HIPACE 情報システム開発計画 • 統合サーバ事例検索 [基本設計] • 工程別ツール適用マップ アドレス https://dev01.sangyou.aaa.co.Jp/project/PJ0AP00012/ XX生産管理次期ステム(PJ0AP00012) [プロジェクト情報] [成果物] - WBS - + ビジネス開発 + システム開発 - ソフトウエア開発 - 基本設計 開発方式設計 データ項目設計 データベース論理設計 ソフトウェア要件定義 + 詳細設計 - プログラム作成 プログラム設計 プログラミング 単体テスト 組合せテスト + テスト + 検査 - プロジェクト管理 + 工程管理 + 品質管理 + 仕様変更管理 + 懸案管理 作業・成果物一覧[項目編集] 作業・成果物名称 作成日 担当者 期限 必要資料一覧[項目編集] 資料名称 作成日 担当者 期限 • 関連規則 [項目編集] • 関連情報 [項目編集] “Pro-Navi” UI (User Interface) Required document Outcomes of former processes WBS Reference materials from outside Hitachi standards
Characteristics of “PRO-NAVI WBS” • Hold WBS structure as prototype Plus • Mutual dependence of works • Display necessary outside Information and Link • Rules and work procedures, etc • Relate WBS’s work with SLCP-JFC98* activities and tasks *A common frame for software centric development and trades PLUS necessity level of works and leveling of standard’s customization allowance
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CYCLE • P-D-C-(A) Plan Management System Action Do Check
Plan * Apply standard WBS Choice of a prototype relevant to business field *Add and modify work items *Work items and schedule WBS generation WBS customization Approval and notification
PLANNING Is a clarification ofProcess, works, outcomes. • Generate WBS • Embody Work step information • Define management process of each work :
We had plentiful asset of standardization rules, development procedures, worksheets, check lists, know-hows Such as reliability design, etc. Embodiment of Work step information Output Work Input Outcomes of prior work Common rules Examples Outcomes(document)
Define management process of each work OUTCOMES WORK Assign member Set due dates Storate and approval rules Issues Bugs Check and reporting method of Works progress status trace method of Outbreak and extinction
Output Work Input Outcomes of prior work Common rules Examples Outcomes(document) “Pro-Navi” assisted Planning essence PRO-NAVI WBS Pro-Navi System OUTCOMES tools WORK Assign member Set due dates Issues Bugs Check and reporting method of Works progress status
“Do” • Confirm one’s work • Exectution=Outcome making *Gather information *Check procedure • Outcome registration and update Confirm “work” Execute “work” Store outcome and report
Project View 1 Check ASSIGNEDorRegistration PROGRESS STATUS DUE DATE Outcomes 3 Register Product File(s) Procedures 2 Reference Prerequisite Works/ References materials .. :deadline failure
“Check” • Check one’s progress • Comparison of schedule and actual status (Grasp fact) • Direct check of outcome • Uniform management of outcomes Work progress check Comparison Check outcomes
Grasp project status • Store ALL OUTCOMES AND WORK STATUS in PRO-NAVI data base. Then display on “Project View”
A railroad company ticket system • Profile- • 800 Kilo source lines of code • 200 project members in 10 separate development locations. • Why- • To achieve high efficiency development and management level • To share project progress status, product files and project common documents
A railroad company ticket system * EFFECT
A railroad company ticket system • Issue of the project management • Product progress status gathering function • example, to grasp project progress status, one needs to select a work in “PRONAVI WBS display frame” of the project view, and then check its progress work by work in “product information display frame”. This operation method has advantage in grasping percentage of completion of products, however, it costs effort to grasp project progress status, and requires a new function to sum up product progress.
Actual application record • 1200 projects are using “PRO-NAVI” • 310,000 files registered • March, 2004.
Evaluation from PRO-NAVI USERS Evaluations from “PRO-NAVI” users : (1) Getting across job of the project standard document and project development plan to its project members has become easier. (2) Development errors due to “version-mistakes” have disappeared, because most recent products can be shared in a secured manner. (3) Search job for necessary products has become much easier. (4) Distribution job of products has become easier. (5) Hard copy document distribution has decreased. (6) Version management of products has become possible. (7) A project manager can easily verify the project status report, because the project manager can directly check the status of the product and its contents with “PRO-NAVI”.
Analysis and Considerations *EFFECTS Clarification and notification of project plan throughout the project. • Correct grasp of project progress status. • Higher quality, higher efficiency, standardization of the project due to easy access to products and common documents. *NEXT STEP • Easier project progress status gathering • Eg., Automatic collection apparatus of project progress status based on products