1 / 9

Institutional Accreditation: What is it?

Institutional Accreditation: What is it? . Higher Learning Commission accredits degree-granting institutions in the North Central region. A ssurance to the public that an institution has met agency’s 5 criteria.

dick
Download Presentation

Institutional Accreditation: What is it?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Institutional Accreditation: What is it? • Higher Learning Commission accredits degree-granting institutions in the North Central region. • Assurance to the public that an institution has met agency’s 5 criteria. • An affirmation of adherence to best practices and aspires to continually improve.

  2. Upcoming Process • Self-study report addressing 5 accreditation criteria submitted. • 5 person team of consultant-evaluators receives report and conducts visit: 10/22-10/24. • HLC board renders decision based on self-study and team report.

  3. Self-Study Conclusions: Strengths and Opportunities

  4. Criterion One: Mission and Integrity • Re-affirmation of mission statement. • Core purpose: quality academic programs. • Alignment between mission and Strategic Plan. • Continue review and publication of unit mission statements. • Continue to evaluate alignment of administrative structures with University’s growing complexity.

  5. Criterion Two: Preparing for the Future • Continue to rely on successful financial strategy. • Principle of Intergenerational Equity: • Quality educational environment belongs to all generations. Resources should be managed to provide quality education to both current and future generations. • Morally sound. • Financially wise policy (minimize debt). • Success in advancing strategic core priorities. • Continue to rely on them, while being open to new actions (e.g., new programs).

  6. Criterion Three: Student Learning and Effective Teaching • Significant progress in assessment of student learning! • Assessment-based improvements in majors, professionally accredited programs, and graduate programs. • Viability of LAE assessment plan and 4 Goals. • LAE Goals align with mission. • Continue review of 2011 LAE Task Force report and foster continuity with 2014 Task Force. `

  7. Criterion Three: Student Learning and Effective Teaching (cont.) • Learning objectives driving course-based assessment. • Recommend “learning objectives prompt” on Faculty Annual Evaluation Reports. • Improve publication of assessment results. • Provide data in ways that ensure student’s privacy right.

  8. Criterion Four: Acquisition, Discovery, and Application of Knowledge • Strong faculty/student collaborative research. • Innovations in service-learning activities indicate opportunities for further developments on campus. • Sociology Department. • Center for Regional Planning. • 175th museum project. • Others. . . .

  9. Criterion Five: Engagement and Service • Continue support for new programs that meet regional needs. • Continue support for collaborations with other institutions. • Service Learning (again).

More Related