1 / 15

SUPPORTIVE INITIATIVES OF BRUSSELS BASED STAKEHOLDERS ANNA VOSEČKOVÁ Pardubice, 13 – 14 May 2014

SUPPORTIVE INITIATIVES OF BRUSSELS BASED STAKEHOLDERS ANNA VOSEČKOVÁ Pardubice, 13 – 14 May 2014. Introducing. CZELO is project based ( grant from EUPRO I and II programme of the Czech MEYS ) established in Brussels in 2005

dicksonr
Download Presentation

SUPPORTIVE INITIATIVES OF BRUSSELS BASED STAKEHOLDERS ANNA VOSEČKOVÁ Pardubice, 13 – 14 May 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SUPPORTIVE INITIATIVES OF BRUSSELS BASED STAKEHOLDERS ANNA VOSEČKOVÁ Pardubice, 13 – 14 May 2014

  2. Introducing • CZELO is project based (grant from EUPRO I and II programme of the Czech MEYS) • established in Brussels in 2005 • implemented by Technology Centre ASCR (NCPs + Strategic studies = project CZERA, EEN) • CZELO3 (2013 – 2016)

  3. Introducing • free of charge services to anybody interested in European and international RTDI cooperation • focus alsoon higher education, innovation,entrepreneurship • new website structured thematically to H2020 • electronic CZELO Bulletin in English

  4. Introducing • CZELO brochure (in Czech) – 24 pages

  5. Introducing • Brochure on new generation of EU programmes and initiatives (in Czech) – CZELO + CEBRE (in June 2014) • CZELO Conference „Water research for Agriculture“, 10 June 2014 in Brussels • 8th Czech Street Party – CZELO stand (interactive quiz on alternative food), 13 June 2014 in Brussels

  6. Brussels stakeholders • intensive RTDI environment • F2F contacts with experts • close and active cooperation of RTDI and higher education offices • growing number of new RTDI initiatives with seat in Brussels

  7. IGLO (1) Informal Group of Liaison Offices • 24 offices (SLORD being the newest) • representing a country or other national body

  8. IGLO (2) • information sharing, partner search, joint events, bilateral consultative meetings, promotion of Czech capabilities • 8 working groups – CZELO co-chairs two of them (INCO, FP Implementation) • ERA-in-Action (active involvement of national experts)

  9. EU Institutions (1) • EU institutions (Council of the EU, European Parliament, European Commission: EC Directorates General – most important) • DG RTD (Research and Innovation): policy and strategy planning, horizontal issues • DG CONNECT (Communication Networks, Content and Technology): ICT, FET

  10. EU Institutions (2) • Other DGs (MOVE, ENVI, CLIMA, ENTR, ENER … + EAC, REGIO) • Executive Agencies managing EU projects: • REA • ERCEA • EASME • INEA • EACEA

  11. Associations • similar working methods as IGLO • but also common statements, advice papers, joint projects • examples: EUREKA, COST, EARTO, ERRIN, LERU, EUA etc. • smaller ones: EuroTech, Coimbra Group, Access EU • new instruments: EIT KICs, art. 185 and 187

  12. Individual Institutions • aim: more visibility and direct lobbying, trainings and writing proposals • usually the case of bigger Member States • real expertise in the office is possible • examples: • DE - Helmholtz, Max Planck, Leibniz, DLR, Fraunhofer, BayFOR, DAAD • UK – Wolverhampton UNI, TSB • ES – A4U • NL - TNO

  13. Recommendations (1) • well structured and updated web (even in English) • direct link from the homepage to European and international cooperation activities • research team profiles (in English) • full exploitation of membership in European and international bodies

  14. Recommendations (2) • full use of all contacts made during other cooperation (projects, events etc.) • synergies within the university / research organization: projects financed by different sources should be managed by one department

  15. Thank you for attention! voseckova@tc.cz www.czelo.cz

More Related