1 / 14

Budgeting 2.0 What’s Best for Your Entity!

Budgeting 2.0 What’s Best for Your Entity!. Priority Based Budgeting Malisa Files City of Redmond, WA mfiles@redmond.gov. City of Redmond, WA Budgeting by Priorities (BP). Budgeting by Priorities ( www.redmond.gov/bp ) Started in Redmond in 2008 (for the 2009-2010 budget)

diep
Download Presentation

Budgeting 2.0 What’s Best for Your Entity!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Budgeting 2.0What’s Best for Your Entity! Priority Based Budgeting Malisa Files City of Redmond, WA mfiles@redmond.gov

  2. City of Redmond, WABudgeting by Priorities (BP) • Budgeting by Priorities (www.redmond.gov/bp ) • Started in Redmond in 2008 (for the 2009-2010 budget) • Just finished 3rd cycle • We do biennial budgets in Redmond • Started by new mayor with strong support from city council • Challenge was to gain support from other leaders in city (e.g. department heads) • Started in response to concerns about “black box” budgeting& • Lack of cooperation between mayor and council on budget • Includes all funds, operations and capital • It takes essentially all year to do! • Based on “The Price of Government”, Hucthinson & Osborne

  3. City of Redmond, WABudgeting by Priorities (BP) • Budgeting by Priorities • City established six “broad goal” prioritiesthrough community forums. • These serve as the “north star” for budget and results focus • Cross organizational staff teams (with citizen participation) develop strategies that “move the dial” on these priorities • This responds to a “dash board” of 22 measures (developed independently) • The strategies are the basis for budget program evaluation by the staff teams • The budget proposals are ranked as to how directly they align with the strategies • Budget proposals must have results oriented measures that illustrate intended outcomes of the program • Staff teams rank each proposal and submit ranking and scale recommendations • Mayor proposes a budget that illustrates how programs achieve results that pursue the community’s priorities

  4. Planning by priorities • 2013-2014 Priorities • Business Community • Clean and Green Environment • Community Building • Infrastructure and Growth • Safety • Responsible Government I want to be safe where I live, learn, work and play. (Safe City) Topics include: police, fire, emergency services, emergency preparedness, lighting, school safety, building safety and traffic/pedestrian safety.

  5. Budget by priorities – strategy map See budget offer: www.redmond.gov/bp Page 270

  6. Budget Offers as ranked by team See budget offer summary: www.redmond.gov/bp Page 271

  7. Dashboard measure for Safety priority

  8. Dashboard measure for Safety priority Performance Management and Budget

  9. Department Example From Council Briefing

  10. Department Example – Police Communications Budget Offer See budget offer: www.redmond.gov/bp Page 288 High Level Program Level

  11. Department Example – Police Records Budget Offer See budget offer: www.redmond.gov/bp Page 310 In this example, we began tracking responsiveness to public records requests in 2011 and found that we are well below our target goal. Prompted question from councilmember – “what would it take to make progress on this measure?”

  12. Benefits / Challenges with Priority Budgeting • Benefits: • Clearly focused on community issues • Organized around organization priorities • Transparent • Cross organizational • Learning • “Decision making” • Results oriented • Connected to organizational strategies to purse community priorities

  13. Benefits / Challenges with Priority Budgeting • Challenges: • Time consuming • Complicated • Must be able to translate easily from priority construct to traditional construct • Transparent • Requires buy-in • From the top • From the stakeholders who might feel threatened

  14. Summing Up • Priority based budgeting is about a lot more than budget • Deep connection to community • Results oriented • Organizational learning • Good conversations in non-traditional sense

More Related