1 / 3

The Leontief Paradox

The Leontief Paradox. In 1953 Wassily Leontief published the results of the most famous empirical investigations in economics, an attempt to test the consistency of the H-O Model with the U.S. trade patterns. Leontief’s objectives were: to prove that the H-O Model was correct; and

dierdra-lysaght
Download Presentation

The Leontief Paradox

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Leontief Paradox In 1953 Wassily Leontief published the results of the most famous empirical investigations in economics, an attempt to test the consistency of the H-O Model with the U.S. trade patterns. Leontief’s objectives were: • to prove that the H-O Model was correct; and • to show that the U.S. exports were capital intensive

  2. The Leontief Paradox Leontief developed a 1947 input-output table for the U.S. to determine the capital-labor ratios used in the production of U.S. exports and imports. Leontief found that the U.S. exports used a capital-labor ratio of $13,991 per man year, whereas import substitutes used a ratio of $18,184 per man year.

  3. The Leontief Paradox The key ratio of [( KX / LX ) / ( KM / LM )] (13,991 / 1) / (18,184 / 1) = 0.77 was calculated. Given the presumption that the U.S. was relatively capital abundant, that ratio was just the reverse of what the H-O Model predicted. Thus, it is called the Leontief Paradox.

More Related