1 / 6

National Map Subcommittee

National Map Subcommittee. NGAC Meeting December 2, 2009. National Map Subcommittee. Assisting TNM strategic planning process Met 11/30 to discuss questions and issues outlined by Larry Sugarbaker and Mark DeMulder Participants:

dieter
Download Presentation

National Map Subcommittee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Map Subcommittee NGAC Meeting December 2, 2009

  2. National Map Subcommittee • Assisting TNM strategic planning process • Met 11/30 to discuss questions and issues outlined by Larry Sugarbaker and Mark DeMulder • Participants: • NGAC: Allen Carroll, Dennis Goreham, Jay Parrish, Dave Maune, Steve Wallach • TNM: Mark DeMulder, Larry Sugarbaker, Mike Domerantz

  3. TNM Strategic Planning Process • Strategic Intent and Objectives, October – December 2009 • Compile stakeholder questions • Formulate strategic questions • Identify external reviewers • Key themes and business drivers • Draft one of strategic plan, January – June 2010 • Develop internal draft one of strategic plan • Prepare draft one for external reviewers (NGAC and other Federal reviewers) • Finalize draft one • Final draft of strategic plan, June – October 2010 • Develop final draft of strategic plan and review internally • Prepare final draft for external reviewers (NGAC and other Federal reviewers) • Public comment period • Internal review of critical comments and risks • Publish final five year National Geospatial Program plan,October 2010

  4. Issues discussed at the Monday session • Results of TNM questionnaire • Who are TNM’s customers and constituencies? (Challenge: constituencies are numerous and diverse) • Role of federal, state, local governments in providing data and as TNM customers • Tension among TNM roles as providing “foundation” base map, vs. data services, vs. products (e.g. published topo maps) • Tension among “nationally consistent” vs. “best available” vs. “authoritative” data

  5. The National Map strategic planning processQUESTION ONE:Should there be an agency that integrates geospatial framework data services for the nation?Should it be USGS?

  6. The National Map strategic planning processQUESTION TWO:Should all National Map data be available to users without restriction?If not, under what terms should The National Map use data on which there are restrictions?

More Related