190 likes | 363 Views
DEA CSOS Pilot Conference Call. June 20, 2002. Agenda. Pilot Overview: Pilot Organization and Scope Phase II: Status Phase III: Work in Progress Phase III: Philosophies/Goals Phase III: Getting Started – Test Factors Phase III: Test Objectives
E N D
DEA CSOS Pilot Conference Call June 20, 2002
Agenda • Pilot Overview: Pilot Organization and Scope • Phase II: Status • Phase III: Work in Progress • Phase III: Philosophies/Goals • Phase III: Getting Started – Test Factors • Phase III: Test Objectives • Phase III: Test Objective Scenarios (Proposed) • Phase III: Approach • Phase III: Timeline • Phase III: Action Items • Questions…
Phase II: Status • 7 CSOS Certificates Issued to-date (2 - Butler,1- Mallinckrodt, 1- Baxter, 1 -McKesson, 2 –McQuery) • 3 Applications Received – In adjudication (3 – North Carolina Mutual Drug) • 2 completed test plans received • Issues identified during testing: • Notarization – external vs. internal • Internal simplification of end-user processes. • Adjudication issues – POA letters need to be formatted to DEA standards • Completed test plans due by July 5!
Phase III: Work in Progress • Milestones: • 850 Transaction Sets Worksheets - Completed • 850 committee decision on signature approach (external to orders vs. wrapped around orders) – Completed • 850 Meeting at HDMA – 7/26 • Future Process Flow Draft - ECD 7/15/02 • Phase III testing to follow completion of Process Flow draft • Work In Progress: • Tom Turner (Abbott) contacting participants to determine trading partnerships for Phase III testing. • HDMA Survey to determine who is presently using EDI INT or other solutions
Phase III: Philosophies/Goals • Philosophies: • Divide and Conquer • EDI 850-oriented, but not exclusive of other technologies • Goals • Leverage Existing Systems • Identify Anticipated Production Deployment Costs • Identify Cost Savings - Capture Workflow Time to Complete
Phase III: Getting Started – Test Factors Test Factors: • Correctness – transactions and processes meet anticipated standards • Error-handling – no “gotchas” later on, tests designed to confirm that systems are catching expired certificates, invalid certificate information, etc. • Interoperability - compatibility between trading partners • Economic - development/process times
Phase III: Test Objectives • Test Objective 1: Key Exchange Process • Test Objective 2: E-222 Generation Process • Test Objective 3: Transmission Process • Test Objective 4: E-222 Receipt Process • Test Objective 5: Order Validation Process • Test Objective 6: Receiving Process
Phase III: Test Objective Scenarios (Proposed) • Test Objective 1: Key Exchange Process • Certificate (or Certificate S/N is received by trading partner • Certificate is properly validated • Certificate is imported into PKI application • Test Objective 2: E-222 Generation Process • PO contains all DEA required fields • PO is uniquely identified (attempt to use same PO # on 2 orders) • Order is digitally signed, purchaser’s system controls access to private key activation correctly • PO is translated properly EDIINT packet is created • Purchaser’s system is enabled with a 10-minute timeout activity period
Phase III: Test Scenarios • Test Objective 2: E-222 Generation Process (Continued) • Purchaser’s system removes private key from memory after log-off • Purchaser’s system syncs time with trusted time source within 5 minutes of NIST’s time • Orders are archived after transmission • Test Objective 3: Transmission Process • EDIINT packet is sent to the receiver without error • In event that transmission process is disrupted, order is rolled-back
Phase III: Test Scenarios • Test Objective 4: E-222 Receipt Process • EDIINT packet is archived • Certificate is validated against the CRL • Expired certificate is used (error handling) • Revoked certificate is used • Digital signature is verified • The CA digital signature on the certificate is verified • Certificate is sent from unauthorized CA (error handling) • The PO is correctly translated by the X.12 translator • Supplier’s system utilizes trusted time source as above
Phase III: Test Scenarios • Test Objective 5: Order Validation Process • DEA extension data and other certificate data is validated • Wrong ship to address is sent • Wrong schedules are ordered • Hash is not SHA-1 • Modified order is detected • Order is sent with no supplier DEA number or cites an incorrect DEA number, but a link to the correct DEA number can be created (correctness)
Phase III: Test Scenarios • Test Objective 5: Order Validation Process (continued) • Order contains incorrect business activity classifications (error-handling) • Order includes all DEA Form 222 information • The order can be placed on hold and discrepancies can be manually resolved • Orders can be split – however only one supplier name is cited on the order • Order contains the name of the controlled substance product • Order can have the NDC added by the supplier after the order has been received, linking to the original • Supplier can link number of packages shipped to order • Order can accommodate an “unlimited” number of items
Phase III: Test Scenarios • Test Objective 5: Order Validation Process • Order can accommodate schedules III through IV as well as 1 and II • Order includes complete ship to address of the supplier • Order contains the date the order is submitted to the supplier • Order contains the name of the controlled substance product • Supplier can link ship to date to order • Test Objective 6: Receiving Process • Purchaser can link number of packages received to order • Purchaser can link items to order
Phase III: Approach • Divide workflow into teams – working with your existing trading partners and vendors • Team A: Purchaser: • Test Objective 1: Key Exchange Process • Test Objective 2: E-222 Generation Process • Test Objective 3: Transmission Process • Test Objective 6: Receiving Process • Team B: Supplier: • Test Objective 4: E-222 Receipt Process • Test Objective 5: Order Validation Process
Phase III: Approach • Leverage existing infrastructure and tools • Decide which process you think you’d be able to develop and test with your partner • Create “Strawman” signed 850 • Results will document “Lessons Learned”
Phase II: Action Items • HDMA survey • Tom Turner (Abbott) mapping processes • Survey vendors for FIPS compatibility • Vendor participation in Pilot?